Advertisement

Supply Chain Analysis

  • Herbert Meyr
  • Jens Rohde
  • Hartmut Stadtler
  • Christopher Sürie

Abstract

Before starting an improvement process one has to have a clear picture of the structure of the existing supply chain and the way it works. Consequently a detailed analysis of operations and processes constituting the supply chain is necessary. Therefore tools are needed that support an adequate evaluation, modelling and description of supply chains. In Sect. 2.1 (key) performance measures are presented. Section 2.2 adds the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR)-model which introduces a standardized terminology, standardized process definitions, metrics and best practices for modelling and configuration of supply chains. A typology of supply chains that enables identification of necessary planning tasks will be discussed in Sect. 2.3.

Keywords

Supply Chain Balance Scorecard Supply Chain Performance Supply Chain Partner Plan Supply Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, J.; Kugeler, M.; Rosemann, M. (2000) Prozessmanagement: Ein Leitfaden zur prozessorientierten Organisationsgestaltung, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  2. Cook, D.P.; Goh, C.-H.; Chung, C.H. (1999) Service typologies: A state of the art survey, Production and Operations Management, Vol. 8, No. 3, 318–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dyckhoff, H.; Finke, U. (1992) Cutting and packing in production and distribution: A typology and bibliography, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fleischmann, B. (1998) Design of freight traffic networks in: Fleischmann, B.; Nunen, J.A.E.E. van; Speranza, M. G.; Stähly, P. (Eds.) Advances in Distribution Logistics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 460, Berlin et al., 55–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horváth, P. (1998) Controlling, 7th ed., MünchenGoogle Scholar
  6. Kaplan, R. S.; Norton, D.P. (1992) The balanced scorecard — Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70, No. 1, 71–79Google Scholar
  7. Kaplan, R. S.; Norton, D. P. (1993) Putting the balanced scorecard to work, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 5, 134–142Google Scholar
  8. Meyer, C. (1994) How the right measures help teams excel, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 72, No. 3, 95–103Google Scholar
  9. PRTM (1997) Introduction to the 1997 Integrated Supply-Chain Benchmarking Study, URL: http://www.supply-chain.org/members/html/presentations.cfm, State: June 9, 2000Google Scholar
  10. O’Dell, C.; Grayson, C.J. (1998) If only we knew what we know: The transfer of internal knowledge and best practice, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Schneeweiss, C. (1999) Einführung in die Produktionswirtschaft, 7th ed., Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  12. Silver, E. A.; Pyke, D. F.; Petersen, R. (1998) Inventory management and production planning and scheduling, 3rd ed., New York et al.Google Scholar
  13. Supply-Chain Council (1999) Supply Chain Council & Supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model overview, URL: http://www.supply-chain.org/html/scor_overview.cfm, State: June 9, 2000Google Scholar
  14. Supply-Chain Council (2000a) Homepage, URL: http://www.supply-chain.org, State: June 9, 2000Google Scholar
  15. Supply-Chain Council (2000b) SCOR metrics level 1 primer, Tech. Paper, Pittsburgh, URL: http://www.supply-chain.org/members/html/wpaper.cfm, State: June 9, 2000Google Scholar
  16. Supply-Chain Council (2000c) Supply chain operations reference-model — Version 3.1, Tech. Paper, Pittsburgh, URL: http://www.supply-chain.org/members/html/scormodel.cfm, State: June 9, 2000Google Scholar
  17. Syska, A. (1990) Kennzahlen für die Logistik, Berlin et al.Google Scholar
  18. Tucker, S. A. (1961) Successful managerial control by ratio-analysis, New York et al.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Herbert Meyr
    • 1
  • Jens Rohde
  • Hartmut Stadtler
  • Christopher Sürie
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Production and LogisticsUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Business Administration, Department of Operations and Materials ManagementDarmstadt University of TechnologyDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations