Advertisement

Combined Intracellular and Surface Staining: Immunofluorescence of Cytokines in T Cells

  • Mario Assenmacher
Chapter
Part of the Springer Lab Manual book series (SLM)

Abstract

Detection of intracellular proteins by immunofluorescence allows to determine frequency, light scatter- and surface-immunophenotype of protein producing cells, irrespective of whether the protein is to be secreted, membrane-bound or localized in the cytoplasm. For cytoplasmatic or nuclear proteins this is the only way to analyse them by flow cytometry. Unfortunately, to date no method is known for cytoplasmatic immunofluorescence of live cells. But recently immunofluorescence of live cells according to secreted products, including cytokines, became possible with the cellular affinity matrix technology (Manz 1995, Assenmacher 1998, see → Kap. 6). In order to allow staining antibodies to penetrate the cell membrane, cells have to be fixed and the membranes permeabilized. The choice of the appropriate fixation method depends on the protein and its intracellular location, and on the further use of the cells to be analysed. For several applications fixation in formaldehyde and permeabilization of cell membranes by saponin (Willingham 1985) has been used successfully, including assessment of cytokines (Sander 1991; Jung 1993; Schmitz 1993; Assenmacher 1994). Formaldehyde is a crosslinking fixative with good preservation of cell morphology. The plant glycoside saponin, a mild nonionic detergent, complexes with membrane cholesterol and other unconjugated β-hydroxysterols leading to ring-shaped complexes with a central pore of about 8nm in diameter (Bangham 1962; Glauert 1962). These pores allow passage of molecules up to several hundred kD large. Since saponin acts in a reversible way it has to be present in all incubation and washing steps. Many nowadays commercially available fixation and permeabilisation buffers contain formaldehyde and saponin, respectively.

Keywords

Tetanus Toxoid Surface Staining Mouse Spleen Cell Mild Nonionic Detergent Anti Cytokine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrams JS, Roncarolo MG, Yssel H, Andersson U, Gleich GJ and Silver JE (1992) Strategies of anti-cytokine monoclonal antibody development: immunoassay of IL-10 and IL-5 in clinical samples. Immunol Rev 127: 5 - 24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alkan S, Akdis C and Towbin H (1994) Chemiluminescent and enzyme-linked immu- noassays for sensitive detection of human IFN-g. J. Immunoassay 15 (3): 217 - 238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson U, Andersson J, Lindfors A, Wagner K, Moller G and Heusser CH (1990) Simultaneous production of interleukin 2, interleukin 4 and interferon-gamma by activated human blood lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 20 (7): 1591 - 6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assenmacher M, Schmitz J and Radbruch A (1994) Flow cytometric determination of cytokines in activated murine T helper lymphocytes: expression of interleukin-10 in interferon-gamma and in interleukin-4-expressing cells. Eur J Immunol 24: 1097 - 1101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assenmacher M, Löhning M, Scheffold A, Manz RA, Schmitz J and Radbruch A (1998) Sequential produciton of IL-2, IFN-y and IL-10 by individual staphylococcal enterotoxin B-activated T helper lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 28: 1534 - 1543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bangham AD and Home RW (1962) Action of saponin on biological cell membranes. Nature 196: 952 - 953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glauert AM, Dingle JT and Lucy JA (1962) Action of saponin on biological cell membranes. Nature 196: 953 - 955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jung T, Schauer U, Heusser C, Neumann C and Rieger C (1993) Detection of intracellular cytokines by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods 159 (1-2): 197 - 207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee CLY, Lee SHS, Jay FT and Rozee KR (1990) Immunobiological study of interferongamma-producing cells after staphylococcal enterotoxin B stimulation. Immunology 70: 94 - 99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Manz R, Assenmacher M, Pfluger E, Miltenyi S and Radbruch A (1995) Analysis and sorting of live cells according to secreted molecules, relocated to a cell-surface affinity matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 9264 (61044): 1921 - 1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mosmann TR, Cherwinski H, Bond MW, Giedlin MA and Coffman RL (1986) Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J Immunol 136 (7): 2348 - 57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ohara J and Paul WE (1985) Production of a monoclonal antibody to and molecular characterization of B-cell stimulatory factor-1. Nature 315 (6017): 333 - 6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pelham HRB (1991) Multiple Targets for Brefeldin A. Cell 67: 449 - 451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prat M, Gribaudo G, Comoglio PM, Cavallo G and Landolfo S (1984) Monoclonal antibodies against murine gamma interferon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 81 (14): 4515 - 9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reth M, Hammerling GJ and Rajewsky K (1978) Analysis of the repertoire of anti-NP antibodies in C57BL/6 mice by cell fusion. I. Characterization of antibody families in the primary and hyperimmune response. Eur J Immunol 8 (6): 393 - 400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sander B, Andersson J and Andersson U (1991) Assessment of cytokines by immunofluorescence and the paraformaldehyde-saponin procedure. Immunol. Rev. 119 (119): 65 - 93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sander B, Hoiden I, Andersson U, Moller E and Abrams JS (1993) Similar frequencies and kinetics of cytokine producing cells in murine peripheral blood and spleen. Cy-atokine detection by immunoassay and intracellular immunostaining. J Immunol Methods 166 (2): 201 - 14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schmitz J, Assenmacher M and Radbruch A (1993) Regulation of T helper cell cytokine expression: functional dichotomy of antigen-presenting cells. Eur J Immunol 23 (1): 191 - 9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schumacher JH, O’Garra A, Shrader B, van Kimmenade A, Bond MW, Mosmann TR and Coffman RL (1988) The characterization of four monoclonal antibodies specific for mouse IL-5 and development of mouse and human IL-5 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. J Immunol 141 (5): 1576 - 81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Spitalny GL and Havell EA (1984) Monoclonal antibody to murine gamma interferon inhibits lymphokine-induced antiviral and macrophage tumoricidal activities. J Exp Med 159 (5): 1560 - 5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tartakoff A and Vassalli P (1978) Comparative studies of intracellular transport of secretory proteins. J. Cell. Biol. 79: 694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Terstappen LWMM, Shah VO, Conrad MP, Recktenwald D and Loken MR (1988) Discriminating between damaged and intact cells in fixed flow cytometric samples. Cytometry 9: 477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Willingham MC and Pastan I (1985). An atlas of immunofluorescence in cultured cells. Orlando, Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Assenmacher
    • 1
  1. 1.Miltenyi Biotec GmbHBergisch GladbachGermany

Personalised recommendations