Advertisement

The Early Frankfurt School Critique of Capitalism: Critical Theory Between Pollock’s “State Capitalism” and the Critique of Instrumental Reason

  • Harry F. Dahms
Part of the Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy book series (SEEP)

Abstract

Despite profound differences, both the German Historical School and the Critical Theory of the Frankfurt School share a common theoretical and cultural heritage in Central European traditions of social thought and philosophy. Although both schools often are perceived as quintessentially German traditions of economic and social research, their methodological presuppositions and critical intent diverge strongly. Since the objective of the Frankfurt School was to carry the theoretical critique initiated by Marx into the twentieth century, and since its members did so on a highly abstract level of theoretical criticism, the suggestion may be surprising that in terms of their respective research agendas, there was a common denominator between the German Historical School and Frankfurt School Critical Theory. To be sure, as will become apparent, the common ground was rather tenuous and indirect. We must ask, then: in what respects did their theoretical and analytical foundations and orientations overlap? How did the German Historical School, as a nineteenth-century tradition of economic thinking, influence the development of the Frankfurt School?

Keywords

Political Economy Critical Theory Capitalist Production State Capitalism Capitalist Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agger, B.: Western Marxism: An Introduction. Classical and Contemporary Sources, Santa Monica, Calif. ( Goodyear ) 1979.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, P.: Considerations of Western Marxism, London (NLB) 1976.Google Scholar
  3. Baran, P. A., SWEEZY, P.:Monopoly Capitalism. An Essay on the American Economic and Social OrderNew York (Monthly Review Press) 1966.Google Scholar
  4. Benhabib, S.: Critique, Norm, and Utopia, New York (Columbia University Press) 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Cassel, G.: Sozialismus oder Fortschritt, Berlin (R. Hobbing ) 1929.Google Scholar
  6. Dahms, H. F.: “From Creative Action to the Social Rationalisation of the Economy: Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Social Theory”, Sociological Theory, 13 (1995), pp. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahms, H. F.: “Theory in Weberian Marxism: Critical Social Theory in Lukâcs and Habermas”, Sociological Theory, 15 (1997), pp. 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahms, H. F.: “Beyond the Carousel of Reification: Critical Social Theory After Lukâcs, Adorno, and Habermas”, Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 18 (1998), pp. 3–62.Google Scholar
  9. Dahms, H. F. (Ed.):Transformations of Capitalism: Economy Society and State in Modern TimesNew York (New York University Press) 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Dubiel, H.:Wissenschaftsorganisation und politische Erfahrung. Studien zur fruehen kritischen TheorieFrankfurt/M. (Suhrkamp) 1978.Google Scholar
  11. Glaser, E.: Im Umfeld des Austromarxismus. Ein Beitrag zur Geistesgeschichte des österreichischen SozialismusWien (Europaverlag) 1981, p. 214.Google Scholar
  12. Habermas, J.: “The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment: Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno”, in: The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Twelve Lectures [1985], translated by Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge, Mass. (MIT Press) 1987, pp. 106–130.Google Scholar
  13. Halm, G.: Die Konkurrenz. Untersuchungen über die Ordnungsprinzipien und Entwicklungstendenzen der kapitalistischen Verkehrswirtschaft, München (Duncker & Humblot) 1929.Google Scholar
  14. Hilferding, R.:Finance Capital. A study of the latest phase of capitalist development [1910], London (Routledge & Kegan Paul) 1981.Google Scholar
  15. Horkheimer, M.: “The Authoritarian State”, in: A. ARATO, E. GEBHARDT (Eds.): The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, New York (Urizen Books) 1978, pp. 95117.Google Scholar
  16. Horkheimer, M.: “Traditional and Critical Theory” [ 1937 ], in: Critical Theory. Selected Essays, trans. by M. J. O’Connell and others, New York (Continuum) 1986, pp. 188–243.Google Scholar
  17. Horkheimer, M., ADORNO, TH. W.: Dialectic of Enlightenment [1944], translated by John Cummings, New York (Continuum) 1995.Google Scholar
  18. Jacoby, H.: The Bureaucratization of the World, Berkeley (University of Caifornia Press) 1973.Google Scholar
  19. Jay, M.: Dialectical Imagination. A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research 1923–1950, Boston (Little, Brown and Co. ) 1973.Google Scholar
  20. Keynes, J. M.: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, New York ( Harcourt, Brace ) 1936.Google Scholar
  21. Korsch, K.: Marxism and Philosophy [1923], translated by Fred Halliday, London (Verso) 1970.Google Scholar
  22. Luxacs, G.: History and Class Consciousness. Studies in Marxist Dialectics [ 1923 ], translated by R. Livingstone, Cambridge, Mass. (MIT Press) 1971.Google Scholar
  23. Lowy, M.: “Figures of Weberian Marxism”, Theory and Society, 25 (1996), pp. 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marx, K.: Grundrisse. Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft) [1857–58], trans. by M. Nicolaus, London (Penguin Books) 1973.Google Scholar
  25. Marx, K.: Capital. A Critique of Political Economy [1867], translated by Ben Fowkes, New York (Vintage Books) 1977.Google Scholar
  26. Neumann, F.: Behemoth. The Structure and Practice of National Socialism, New York (Oxford University Press) 1942.Google Scholar
  27. Pollock, F.: “Sombarts `Widerlegung’ des Marxismus”, Beihefte zum Archiv für die Geschichte des Sozialismus und der Arbeiterbewegung, 3, ed. by C. Grünberg, Leipzig (Hirschfeld) 1926.Google Scholar
  28. Pollocx, F.: “Zur marxschen Geldtheorie”, Archiv für die Geschichte des Sozialismus und der Arbeiterbewegung, 13 (1927), pp. 193–209.Google Scholar
  29. Pollock, F, F.: “Die planwirtschaftlichen Versuche in der Sowjetunion 1917–1927”, Schriften des Instituts für Sozialforschung, 2, Leipzig (Hirschfeld) 1929.Google Scholar
  30. Pollook, F.: “Book Review of Gustav Cassel, Sozialismus oder Fortschritt, etc. ”, Archiv für die Geschichte des Sozialismus und der Arbeiterbewegung, 15 (1930),pp. 464–473.Google Scholar
  31. Pollook, F. (1932a): “Die gegenwärtige Lage des Kapitalismus und die Aussichten einer planwirtschaftlichen Neordnung”, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 1 (1932), pp. 8–27.Google Scholar
  32. Pollook, F. (1932b): “Sozialismus und Landwirtschaft”, in: Festschrift für Carl Grünberg zum 70. Geburtstag, Stuttgart (Kohlhammer) 1932.Google Scholar
  33. Pollook, F.: “Bermerkungen zur Wirtschaftskrise”, Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 2 (1933), pp. 321–54.Google Scholar
  34. Pollock, F. (1941a): “State Capitalism: Its Possibilities and Limitations”, Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9 (1941), pp. 200–25.Google Scholar
  35. Pollock, F. (1941b): “Is National Socialism a New Order?” Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9 (1941), pp. 440–55.Google Scholar
  36. Pollock, F.: “Automation. Materialien zur Beurteilung der ökonomischen und sozialen Folgen” [ 1956 ], Frankfurter Beiträge zur Soziologie, 5, Frankfurt/M. ( EVA ) 1964.Google Scholar
  37. Pot_Lock, F.: The Economic and Social Consequences of Automation, transi. by W. O. Henderson and W. H. Chaloner, Oxford (Basil Blackwell ) 1957.Google Scholar
  38. Postone, M.: Time, Labour, and Social Domination. A reinterpretation of Marx’s critical theory, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1993.Google Scholar
  39. Postone, M., BRICK, B.: “Critical Pessimism and the Limits of Traditional Marxism”, Theory and Society, 11 (1982), pp. 617–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schumpeter, J. A.: Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, Leipzig (Duncker & Humblot) 1912.Google Scholar
  41. Schumpeter, J. A.: “Max Weber’s Work” [1920], in: R. SWEDBERG (Ed.): The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, Princeton (Princeton University Press) 1991, pp. 220–227.Google Scholar
  42. Schumpeter, J. A.: The Theory of Economic Development. An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle [ 1926 ], transi. by R. Opie, Cambridge, Mass. (Harvard University Press) 1934.Google Scholar
  43. Schumpeter, J. A.: Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, New York (Harper & Brothers) 1942.Google Scholar
  44. Schumpeter, J. A.: History of Economic Analysis, ed. by E. Boody Schumpeter, New York (Oxford University Press) 1954.Google Scholar
  45. Simmel, G.: The Philosophy of Money [1907], ed. by D. Frisby, transi. by T. Bottomore and D. Frisby, London (Routledge) 1990.Google Scholar
  46. Weber, M.: The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, New York (Charles Scribner’s Sons) 1930.Google Scholar
  47. Weber, M.: “The Social Psychology of the World Religions,” in: H. H. GERTH, C. WRIGHT MILLS (Eds.): From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, New York (Oxford University Press) 1946, pp. 267–301.Google Scholar
  48. Weber, M.: Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology [ 1922 ], translated by E. Fischoff ; edited by G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley (University of California Press) 1978.Google Scholar
  49. Wellmer, A.: Critical Theory of Society [ 1969 ], translated by J. Cumming, New York (Continuum) 1971.Google Scholar
  50. Wiggershaus, R.: The Frankfurt School. Its History, Theories, and Political Significance [ 1986 ], Cambridge, Mass. ( MIT Press ) 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry F. Dahms

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations