Plant Nitrogen pp 369-378 | Cite as

Natural Genetic Variability in Nitrogen Metabolism

  • Anis M. Limami
  • Dominique de Vienne


Plant development is the result of various genetically controlled interacting metabolic processes, which are to a large extent modulated by environmental factors. In this context, the key role of absorption, distribution and accumulation of nutrient elements deserves the attention of the geneticist and the plant breeder, because these complex traits display a large variability between and within species, which may be important in terms of adaptation of the genotypes, or species, to various environments (Kjaer and Jensen 1995). Works dedicated to major nutritional variations were carried out to unravel reasons of both inefficiency in nutrient utilisation and efficiency of utilisation under nutrient stress. As early as 1943, Weiss studied the genetic variability of iron absorption efficiency in soybean. A susceptible genotype that developed the typical chlorosis of iron deficiency was crossed with a tolerant genotype. Inheritance studies showed that a single pair of alleles, Fe/fe, controlled the efficiency of Fe utilisation. The efficient allele, Fe, is dominant over fe, the fefe plants becoming chlorotic when submitted to Fe-limited conditions. Bell et al. (1958, 1962) demonstrated that the Zea mays mutant (ys1) discovered by Beadle (1929), exhibited yellow stripes between the main veins due to its inability to use iron (Fe3+). Potassium utilisation under severe K deficiency was investigated by Shea et al. (1967, 1968) in various bean genotypes. Very efficient strains were discovered, the most efficient producing almost 50% more dry weight than the less efficient, when supplied with a 0.13 mM KC1 nutrient solution. Efficient and inefficient strains were crossed and their progeny was evaluated for the capacity to grow under low K availability. The results suggested that this trait would be under the control of a single pair of alleles and that “efficiency” was recessive. Similar studies have been expanded to other species and other elements such as P, Ca and Mg. Differences in the use of Ca and Mg were explored in Zea mays, showing variations in yield among corn inbreds growing on soils known to induce Ca and Mg deficiencies (Clark and Brown 1974; Clark 1978). Wide genotypic differences in yield were obtained between bean strains growing on low phosphate (2 mg P), and between tomato strains grown on low nitrogen (35 mg plant-1) (O’Sullivan et al. 1974). Genetic studies coupled to these various investigations showed that the utilisation of major cations and anions could be under polygenic control, except for K in bean, that appeared to be controlled by a single pair of alleles.


Quantitative Trait Locus Glutamine Synthetase Double Haploid Quantitative Trait Locus Analysis Nitrogen Metabolism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beadle GW (1929) Yellow-stripe a factor for chlorophyll deficiency in maize located in the Prpr chromosome. Am Nat 63: 189–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell WD, Bogorad L, Mcllrath WJ (1958) Response of the yellow-stripe mutant (ysl) to ferrous and ferric iron. Bot Gaz 120: 36–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell WD, Bogorad L, Mcllrath WJ (1962) Yellow-stripe in maize. I.Effects of ysl locus on uptake and utilisation of iron. Bot Gaz 124: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertholdsson NO, Stoy V (1995) Yields of dry matter and nitrogen in highly diverging genotypes of winter wheat in relation to N-uptake and N-utilization. J Agric Crop Sci 175: 285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai X, Wong PP (1989) Subunit composition of glutamine synthetase isozymes from root nodules of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Plant Physiol 91: 1056–1062PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark RB (1978) Differential response of corn inbreds to calcium. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 9: 729–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark RB, Brown JC (1974) Differential mineral uptake by maize inbreds. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 5: 213–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cox MC, Qualset CO, Rains DW (1985) Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat. II. Nitrogen assimilation in relation to grain yield and protein. Crop Sci 25: 435–440Google Scholar
  9. Cox MC, Qualset CO, Rains DW (1986) Genetic variation for nitrogen assimilation and translocation in wheat. III. Nitrogen translocation in relation to grain yield and protein. Crop Sci 26: 737–740Google Scholar
  10. Cregan PB, van Berkum P (1984) Genetics of nitrogen metabolism and physiological/biochemical selection for increased grain crop productivity. Theor Appl Genet 67: 97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Vienne D, Rodolphe F (1985) Biochemical and genetic properties of oligomeric structures: a general approach. J Theor Biol 116: 527–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards MD, Stuber CW, Wendel JF (1987) Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. 1 Numbers, distribution and types of gene action. Genetics 116: 113–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Edwards MD, Helentjaris T, Wright S, Stuber CW (1992) Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. 4 Analysis based on genome saturation with isozyme and restriction fragment length polyymorphism markers. Theor Appl Genet 83: 765–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jansen RC, Stam P (1994) High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping. Genetics 136: 1447–1455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Jiang Q, Gresshoff P (1997) Classical and molecular genetics of the model legume Lotus japonicus. Mol Plant Micr Interac 10: 59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kearsey MJ, Farquhar GLA (1998) QTL analysis in plants; where are we now? Heredity 80: 137–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kjaer B, Jensen J (1995) The inheritance of nitrogen and phosphorus content in barley analysed by genetic markers. Hereditas 123: 109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lesaint C, Coïc Y (1983) Cultures hydroponiques. La Maison Rustique, Flammarion, Paris, 215 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Limami MA, Phillipson B, Ameziane R, Pernollet N, Jiang Q, Roy R, Deleens E, Chaumont-Bonnet M, Gresshoff PM, Hirel B (1999) Does root glutamine synthetase control plant biomass production in Lotus japonicus L.? Planta 209: 495–502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Sullivan J, Gabelman WH, Gerloff GC (1974) Varitions in efficiency of nitrogen utilization in tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculenturn Mill) grown under nitrogen stress. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 99: 543–547Google Scholar
  21. Paterson AH, Lander ES, Hewitt JD, Paterson S, Lincoln SE, Tanksley SD (1988) Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Nature 335: 721–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pelleschi S, Guy S, Kim JY, Pointe C, Mahé A, Barthes L, Leonardi A, Prioul JL (1999) Ivr2, a candidate gene for a QTL of vacuolar invertase activity in maize leaves. Gene-specific expression under water stress. Plant Mol Biol 39: 373–380Google Scholar
  23. Prioul JL, Quarrie S, Causse M, de Vienne D (1997) Dissecting complex physiological functions through the use of molecular quantitative genetics. J Exp Bot 48: 1151–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rajcan I, Tollenaar M (1999a) Source: sink ratio and leaf senescence in maize: I. Dry matter accumulation and partitioning during grain filling. Field Crops Res. 60: 245–253Google Scholar
  25. Rajcan I, Tollenaar M (1999b) Source: sink ratio and leaf senescence in maize: II. Nitrogen metabolism during grain filling. Field Crops Res 60: 255–265Google Scholar
  26. Richard-Molard C, Wuillème S, Scheel C, Gresshoff PM, Morot-Gaudry JF, Limami MA (1999) Nitrogen-induced changes in morphological development and bacterial susceptibility of Belgian endive (Cichorium intybus L.) are genotype-dependent. Planta 209: 389–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scheible WR, Lauerer M, Schulze ED, Caboche M, Stitt M (1997) Accumulation of nitrate in the shoot acts as a signal to regulate shoot-root allocation in tobacco. Plant J 11: 671–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shea PF, Gerloff GC, Gabelman WH (1967) The inheritance of efficiency in potassium utilization in snapbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 91: 286–293Google Scholar
  29. Shea PF, Gerloff GC, Gabelman WH (1968) Differing efficiencies of potassium uti- lization in strains of snapbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris). L Plant Soil 28: 337–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Soller M., Brody T., Genizi A. (1976) On the power of experimental designs for the detection of linkage between marker loci and quantitative loci in crosses between inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet, 47: 35–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Temple SJ, Knight TJ, Unkefer PJ, Sengupta-Gopalan S (1993) Modulation of glutamine synthetase gene expression in tobacco by the introduction of an alfalfa glutamine synthetase gene in sense and antisense orientation: molecular and biochemical analysis. Mol Gen Genet 236: 315–325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Temple SJ, Bagga S, Sengupta-Gopalan S (1998) Down-regulation of specific members of the glutamine syntethase gene family in alfalfa by antisense RNA technology. Plant Mol Biol 37: 535–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Trewavas AJ (1983) Nitrate as a plant hormone. In: Jackson MB (eds) Interactions between nitrogen and growth regulators in the control of plant development. British Plant Growth Regulator Group, Wantage, Oxfordshire, pp 97–110Google Scholar
  34. Vincent R, Fraisier V, Chaillou S, Limami MA, Deléens E, Phillipson B, Douat C, Boutin JP, Hirel B (1997) Overexpression of a soybean gene encoding cytosolic glutamine synthetase in shoots of transgenic Lotus corniculatus L. plants triggers changes in ammonium assimilation and plant development. Planta 201: 424–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang RL, Stec A, Hey J, Lukens L, Doebley J (1999) The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398: 236–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zeng Z-B (1994) Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics 136: 1457–1468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang H, Forde BG (1998) An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. Science 279: 407–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anis M. Limami
    • 1
  • Dominique de Vienne
    • 2
  1. 1.INRA Versailles, Route de Saint CyrUnité Nutrition Azotée des PlantesVersailles CedexFrance
  2. 2.Ferme du MoulonStation de Génétique Végétale, INRA/UPS/INA PGGif-sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations