Advertisement

Reducing Nonpoint Source Phosphorus Runoff from Poultry Manure with Aluminum Sulfate

  • Pa. MooreJr
  • Tc. Daniel
  • Dr. Edwards

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is generally considered to be the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in lakes and rivers. Phosphorus runoff from soils fertilized with animal manures, such as poultry manure, can be relatively high even when moderate application rates are used. Recent research has indicated that treating poultry manure with aluminum sulfate (alum) can reduce phosphorus runoff and decrease ammonia volatilization. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of alum applications to poultry manure on (1) ammonia volatilization rates from manure, (2) atmospheric ammonia levels in poultry houses, (3) poultry performance (weight gains, feed conversion, etc.), (4) energy use, and (5) P runoff from small watersheds. Two farms in NW Arkansas, USA, were utilized for this study. Alum was applied at a rate of 1816 kg house−1 in half of the houses at each farm after each flock of birds and incorporated into the manure. The other houses were controls. Ammonia volatilization rates were reduced by 97% with alum applications for the first four weeks of each growout. Birds grown on alum-treated manure were significantly heavier and had better feed conversion that birds grown in control houses. Energy use was also lower in alum-treated houses due to reduced ventilation requirements to remove ammonia (NH3). An economic analysis indicated that this best management practice was very cost-effective, with a benefit/ cost ratio of 1.96. Phosphorus runoff from normal and alum-treated poultry manure was evaluated from field-sized plots (1 acre each) for 3 years. Phosphorus concentrations in runoff water from alum-treated manure were 75% lower than normal manure. These results indicate that treating poultry manure with alum is a cost-effective best management practice that reduces nonpoint source P runoff.

Keywords

Tall Fescue Poultry Manure Poultry Litter Ammonia Volatilization Aluminum Sulfate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson DP, Beard CW, Hanson RP (1964) The adverse effects of ammonia on chickens including resistance to infection with Newcastle disease virus. Avian Dis 8: 369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ApSimon HM, Kruse M, Bell JNB (1987) Ammonia emissions and their role in acid deposition. Atmosph Environ 21: 1939–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brewer SK (1998) Ammonia flux from fresh, re-used, and alum-treated broiler litter. MS Thesis, University of Arkansas, FayettevilleGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlile FS (1984) Ammonia in poultry houses: a literature review. World’s Poultry Sci J 40: 99–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards DR, Daniel TC (1992a) Potential runoff quality effects of poultry manure slurry applied to fescue plots. Am Soc Agric Eng 35: 1827–1832Google Scholar
  6. Edwards DR, Daniel TC (1992b) Environmental impacts of on-farm poultry waste disposal — a review. Bioresour Technol 41: 9–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards DR, Daniel TC (1993) Effects of poultry litter application rate and rainfall intensity on quality of runoff from fescue plots. J Environ Qual 22: 361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Line JE (1998) Aluminum sulfate treatment of poultry litter to reduce Salmonella and Campylobacter populations. Poultry Sci Abstr S364Google Scholar
  9. Moore PA Jr, Miller DM (1994) Decreasing phosphorus solubility in poultry litter with aluminum, calcium and iron amendments. J Environ Qual 23: 325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moore PA Jr, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Miller DM (1995) Effect of chemical amendments on ammonia volatilization from poultry litter. J Environ Qual 24: 293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moore PA Jr, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Miller DM (1996) Evaluation of chemical amendments to reduce ammonia volatilization from poultry litter. Poultry Sci 75: 315–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moore PA Jr, Daniel TC, Gilmour JT, Shreve BR, Edwards DR, Wood BH (1998) Decreasing metal runoff from poultry litter with aluminum sulfate. J Environ Qual 27: 92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore PA Jr, Haggard BE, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Shreve BR, Sauer TJ (1997a) Demonstration of nutrient management for poultry litter using alum precipitation of soluble phosphorus. Final Report to US EPA for Federal Assistance Project No 9006749920. pp. 114Google Scholar
  14. Moore PA Jr, Huff WE, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Sauer TC (1997b) Effect of aluminum sulfate on ammonia fluxes from poultry litter in commercial houses. Proc 5th Int Symp Livestock Environ, II: 883–891, Bloomington, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  15. Nichols DJ, Daniel TC, Moore PA Jr, Edwards DR, Pote DH (1997) Runoff of estrogen hormone 17ß-estradiol from poultry litter applied to pasture. J Environ Qual 26: 1002–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reece FN, Lott BD, Deaton JW (1981) Low concentrations of ammonia during brooding decrease broiler weight. Poultry Sci 60: 937–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scantling M, Waldroup A, Marcy J, Moore P (1995) Microbiological effects of treating poultry litter with aluminum sulfate. Poultry Sci Abstracts pp 216Google Scholar
  18. Schindler DW (1977) The evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 195: 260–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schroder H (1985) Nitrogen losses from Danish agriculture — Trends and consequences. Agric Ecosyst Environ 14: 279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shreve BR, Moore PA Jr, Daniel TC, Edwards DR (1995) Reduction of phosphorus in runoff from field-applied poultry litter using chemical amendments. J Environ Qual 24: 106–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sonzogni WC, Chapra SC, Armstrong DE, Logan TJ (1982) Bioavailability of phosphorus inputs to lakes. J Environ Qual 11: 555–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. US Environmental Protection Agency (1979) Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes (EPA–600/4–79–020). US EPA, EMSL, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  23. van Breemen N, Burrough PA, Velthorst EJ, van Dobben HF, de Wit T, Ridder TB, Reijinders HFR (1982) Soil acidification from atmospheric ammonium sulphate in forest canopy throughfall. Nature 299: 548–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams PEV (1992) Socio constraints on poultry production — addressing environmental and consumer concerns. In: 1992 Proc Arkansas Nutrition Conference, Fayetteville, pp 14–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pa. MooreJr
    • 1
  • Tc. Daniel
    • 1
  • Dr. Edwards
    • 2
  1. 1.USDA-ARS, Plant Sciences 115, Agronomy DepartmentUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.USDA-ARSUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations