Skip to main content

Reducing Nonpoint Source Phosphorus Runoff from Poultry Manure with Aluminum Sulfate

  • Conference paper
Biological Resource Management Connecting Science and Policy

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) is generally considered to be the limiting nutrient for eutrophication in lakes and rivers. Phosphorus runoff from soils fertilized with animal manures, such as poultry manure, can be relatively high even when moderate application rates are used. Recent research has indicated that treating poultry manure with aluminum sulfate (alum) can reduce phosphorus runoff and decrease ammonia volatilization. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of alum applications to poultry manure on (1) ammonia volatilization rates from manure, (2) atmospheric ammonia levels in poultry houses, (3) poultry performance (weight gains, feed conversion, etc.), (4) energy use, and (5) P runoff from small watersheds. Two farms in NW Arkansas, USA, were utilized for this study. Alum was applied at a rate of 1816 kg house−1 in half of the houses at each farm after each flock of birds and incorporated into the manure. The other houses were controls. Ammonia volatilization rates were reduced by 97% with alum applications for the first four weeks of each growout. Birds grown on alum-treated manure were significantly heavier and had better feed conversion that birds grown in control houses. Energy use was also lower in alum-treated houses due to reduced ventilation requirements to remove ammonia (NH3). An economic analysis indicated that this best management practice was very cost-effective, with a benefit/ cost ratio of 1.96. Phosphorus runoff from normal and alum-treated poultry manure was evaluated from field-sized plots (1 acre each) for 3 years. Phosphorus concentrations in runoff water from alum-treated manure were 75% lower than normal manure. These results indicate that treating poultry manure with alum is a cost-effective best management practice that reduces nonpoint source P runoff.

Mention of a trade name, proprietary product, or specific equipment does not constitute a guarantee or warranty by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that may be suitable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson DP, Beard CW, Hanson RP (1964) The adverse effects of ammonia on chickens including resistance to infection with Newcastle disease virus. Avian Dis 8: 369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ApSimon HM, Kruse M, Bell JNB (1987) Ammonia emissions and their role in acid deposition. Atmosph Environ 21: 1939–1946

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer SK (1998) Ammonia flux from fresh, re-used, and alum-treated broiler litter. MS Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile FS (1984) Ammonia in poultry houses: a literature review. World’s Poultry Sci J 40: 99–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DR, Daniel TC (1992a) Potential runoff quality effects of poultry manure slurry applied to fescue plots. Am Soc Agric Eng 35: 1827–1832

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DR, Daniel TC (1992b) Environmental impacts of on-farm poultry waste disposal — a review. Bioresour Technol 41: 9–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards DR, Daniel TC (1993) Effects of poultry litter application rate and rainfall intensity on quality of runoff from fescue plots. J Environ Qual 22: 361–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Line JE (1998) Aluminum sulfate treatment of poultry litter to reduce Salmonella and Campylobacter populations. Poultry Sci Abstr S364

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PA Jr, Miller DM (1994) Decreasing phosphorus solubility in poultry litter with aluminum, calcium and iron amendments. J Environ Qual 23: 325–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PA Jr, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Miller DM (1995) Effect of chemical amendments on ammonia volatilization from poultry litter. J Environ Qual 24: 293–300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PA Jr, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Miller DM (1996) Evaluation of chemical amendments to reduce ammonia volatilization from poultry litter. Poultry Sci 75: 315–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PA Jr, Daniel TC, Gilmour JT, Shreve BR, Edwards DR, Wood BH (1998) Decreasing metal runoff from poultry litter with aluminum sulfate. J Environ Qual 27: 92–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PA Jr, Haggard BE, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Shreve BR, Sauer TJ (1997a) Demonstration of nutrient management for poultry litter using alum precipitation of soluble phosphorus. Final Report to US EPA for Federal Assistance Project No 9006749920. pp. 114

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore PA Jr, Huff WE, Daniel TC, Edwards DR, Sauer TC (1997b) Effect of aluminum sulfate on ammonia fluxes from poultry litter in commercial houses. Proc 5th Int Symp Livestock Environ, II: 883–891, Bloomington, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols DJ, Daniel TC, Moore PA Jr, Edwards DR, Pote DH (1997) Runoff of estrogen hormone 17ĂŸ-estradiol from poultry litter applied to pasture. J Environ Qual 26: 1002–1006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reece FN, Lott BD, Deaton JW (1981) Low concentrations of ammonia during brooding decrease broiler weight. Poultry Sci 60: 937–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scantling M, Waldroup A, Marcy J, Moore P (1995) Microbiological effects of treating poultry litter with aluminum sulfate. Poultry Sci Abstracts pp 216

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindler DW (1977) The evolution of phosphorus limitation in lakes. Science 195: 260–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroder H (1985) Nitrogen losses from Danish agriculture — Trends and consequences. Agric Ecosyst Environ 14: 279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shreve BR, Moore PA Jr, Daniel TC, Edwards DR (1995) Reduction of phosphorus in runoff from field-applied poultry litter using chemical amendments. J Environ Qual 24: 106–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sonzogni WC, Chapra SC, Armstrong DE, Logan TJ (1982) Bioavailability of phosphorus inputs to lakes. J Environ Qual 11: 555–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1979) Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes (EPA–600/4–79–020). US EPA, EMSL, Cincinnati, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • van Breemen N, Burrough PA, Velthorst EJ, van Dobben HF, de Wit T, Ridder TB, Reijinders HFR (1982) Soil acidification from atmospheric ammonium sulphate in forest canopy throughfall. Nature 299: 548–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PEV (1992) Socio constraints on poultry production — addressing environmental and consumer concerns. In: 1992 Proc Arkansas Nutrition Conference, Fayetteville, pp 14–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moore, P., Daniel, T., Edwards, D. (2000). Reducing Nonpoint Source Phosphorus Runoff from Poultry Manure with Aluminum Sulfate. In: BalĂ¡zs, E., et al. Biological Resource Management Connecting Science and Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04033-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04033-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-04035-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04033-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics