Accessibility to Information within the Internet: How can it be Measured and Mapped?

  • Martin Dodge
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


One definition of the Internet is ‘... a collection of resources that can be reached from those networks’ (Krol and Hoffman 1993, 1). This definition provides the starting point for my conceptualization of accessibility in the Information Age. I will examine how one can begin to measure and visualize the aspects of accessibility to information resources within the Internet. My discussion starts with the assumption that a person has physical access to the Internet, via a networked computer1. Once this ‘physical’ connectivity has been overcome, how accessible are the information resources, people, and electronic places available online? What are the future accessibility issues that need to be considered to realize the full potential of the Internet beyond basic connectivity? As the Microsoft mantra says, where do you want to go today?, so what resources are accessible within the Internet and how do you reach them? This is very much a concern with individual accessibility and with developing a behavioral geography for Cyberspace (Brunn 1998, Kwan 1998).


Virtual World Information Space Internet Service Provider Accessibility Measure Information Accessibility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, P. 1998. Network topologies and virtual place. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88:88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderman, D.H. and Good, D.B. 1997. Exploring the virtual South: The idea of a distinctive region on ‘The Web’. Southeastern Geographer 37:20–45.Google Scholar
  3. Alderman, D.H. 1998. Finding the heart of Dixie in cyberspace: The Internet as a new laboratory for cultural geography, paper presented at The Association of American Geographers 94 th Annual Meeting, March, Boston MA.Google Scholar
  4. Anders, P. 1998. Envisioning Cyberspace: Designing 3D Electronic Space. New York:.McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  5. ASIS 1998. American Society for Information Science (ASIS) ‘98 — Information Access in the Global Information Economy, 24–29 October, Pittsburgh PA.Google Scholar
  6. Batty, M. 1990. Invisible cities, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 17:127–30.Google Scholar
  7. Batty, M. 1997. Virtual geography, Futures 29: 337–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckett D. 1997. 30% accessible A survey of the UK Wide Web, Proceedings of the Sixth International WWW Conference, April, Stanford CA.Google Scholar
  9. Berghel H. 1997. Cyberspace 2000: Dealing with information overload, Communications of the ACM, February 1997 40 2:19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bharat, K. and Broder, A. 1998. A Technique for measuring the relative size and overlap of Web search engines, Proceedings of the Seventh International WWW Conference, April, Brisbane Australia, 379–88.Google Scholar
  11. Bray, T. 1996. Measuring the Web, Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 2:8 7–11, 993–1005.Google Scholar
  12. Brunn, S.D. 1998. The Internet as ‘the new world’ of and for geography: speed, structures, volumes, humility and civility, GeoJournal 45: 1–2, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cairncross, F. 1997. The Death of Distance: How the Communications Revolution Will Change Our Lives. Cambridge MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  14. Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society, Vol. 1 of The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. demente, P. 1998. The State of the Net: The New Frontier. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  16. Couclelis, H. 1996. The death of distance, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23: 387–89.Google Scholar
  17. Damer, B. 1998. Avatar!: Exploring and Building Virtual Worlds on the Internet. Berkeley CA: Peachpit Press.Google Scholar
  18. December, J. 1995. A cybermap gazetteer. In Staple, G.C. (ed.) TeleGeography 1995: Global Communications Traffic Statistics & Commentary. Washington DC: TeleGeography Inc., 74–81.Google Scholar
  19. Dodge, M. 1998. Journey to the centre of the Web. In Staple, G.C. (ed.) TeleGeography 1998/99: Global Communications Traffic Statistics & Commentary. Washington DC: TeleGeography, Inc., 150–54.Google Scholar
  20. Dodge, M. 1999a. Explorations in AlphaWorld: The geography of 3d virtual worlds on the Internet, paper presented at RGS-IBG Annual Conference — Geographies of the Future, Leicester UK, 4–7 January.Google Scholar
  21. Dodge, M. 1999b. Atlas of Cyberspaces. London: Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London ( Scholar
  22. Donath, J. S. 1997. Inhabiting the virtual city: The Design of Social Environments for Electronic Communities. PhD thesis, MIT ( Scholar
  23. Dyson, E. 1999. Search and searchability, The Guardian, Online section, 14 January, 11.Google Scholar
  24. Fagrell, H. and Sorensen, C. 1997. It’s life Jim, but not as we know it!, Proceedings of the WebNet’97 Conference, October, Toronto, ( Scholar
  25. Gaines, B.R., Chen, L.L. and Shaw, L. 1997. Modeling the human factors of scholarly communities support through the Internet and World Wide Web, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48:987–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Henkel, T. 1998. An Internet artifact: place-concepts revealed in the virtual world. Paper presented at the Telecommunications and the City Conference, Athens GA, University of Georgia, March.Google Scholar
  27. Hillis, K. 1996. A geography of the eye: the technologies of virtual reality. In Shield, R. (ed.) Cultures of the Internet: Virtual Spaces, Real Histories, Living Bodies London: Sage Publications, 70–98.Google Scholar
  28. Holderness, M. 1998. Who are the world’s information-poor? In Loader, B. (ed.) Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency and Policy in the Information Society. London: Rout-ledge, 35–56.Google Scholar
  29. Huberman, B.A., Pirolli, P.L.T., Pitkow, J.E. and Lukose, R.J. 1998. Strong regularities in World Wide Web surfing. Science 280(3 April):95–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huberman, B.A. and Lukose, R.M. 1997. Social dilemmas and Internet congestion. Science 277 (25 July):535–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ITU 1997. Challenges to the Network: Telecommunications and the Internet. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union, September.Google Scholar
  32. Jackson, M.H. and Purcell, D. 1997. Politics and media richness in the World Wide Web representation of the former Yugoslavia. The Geographical Review 87:219–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jellinek, D. 1998. Door policy at Number 10, The Guardian Online section 7 May, 7.Google Scholar
  34. Krol, E. and Hoffman, E. 1993. FYI on ‘what is the Internet?’ Request for Comments: 1462 fMay 1993), ( Scholar
  35. Lawrence, S. and Giles, C.L. 1998. Searching the World Wide Web, Science 280(3 April):98–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lesk, M. 1998. How much information is there in the world? Paper presented at the Time & Bits: Managing Digital Continuity conference, Getty Information Institute, February, Los Angeles ( Scholar
  37. Murnion, S. and Healey, R.G. 1998. Modelling distance decay effects in Web server information flows, Geographical Analysis 30:285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Network Wizards 1998. Internet Domain Survey (
  39. Nielsen, J. 2000. Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Norris, D.A. 1998. The developing world and the World-Wide Web: Search engine topical coverage, 1997. Paper presented at The Association of American Geographers 94th Annual Meeting, March, Boston MA.Google Scholar
  41. Paxson, V., End-to-end routing behavior in the Internet, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, October 1997 5(5):601–15.Google Scholar
  42. Pirolli, P., Pitkow, J. and Rao, R. 1996, Silk from a sow’s ear: extracting usable structures from the Web, Computer-Human Interaction (CHI’96) Conference, April, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  43. Pitkow, J.E. 1998. Summary of WWW characterizations. Paper presented at The Seventh International World-Wide Web Conference, April, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  44. Quarterman, J.S., Smoot, CM. and Gretchen, P. 1994. Internet interaction pinged and mapped, Proceedings of the INET’94 Conference, Internet Society, July, Prague, 522:1–4.Google Scholar
  45. Quarterman, J.S. 1997. The Internet weather report. In Staple, G.C. (ed.) TeleGeography 1997/98: Global Communications Traffic Statistics & Commentary. Washington DC: TeleGeography Inc., 69–72.Google Scholar
  46. Rafaeli, S., Sudweeks, F. and McLaughlin, M. 1998. Network & Netplay: Virtual Groups on the Internet. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rickard, J. 1996. Mapping the Internet with Traceroute. Boardwatch Magazine 10 (December). (
  48. Rickard, J. 1997. Backbone performance measurement, Boardwatch Magazine Directory of Internet Service Providers 2(Fall):22–31.Google Scholar
  49. Rossney, R. 1996. Metaworlds. Wired A.06:U0ff. Google Scholar
  50. Salus, P.H. 1995. Casting the Net: From ARPANET to Internet and Beyond… Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  51. Schroeder, R. 1997. Networked worlds: social aspects of multi-user virtual reality, Sociological Research Online 2:4. ( Scholar
  52. Shenk, D. 1997. Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, J. 1997. The emerging geographies of virtual worlds, The Geographical Review 87(2): 172–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vevo, 1999. AlphaWorld Mapper (
  55. Vilett, R. 1999. AlphaWorld maps ( Scholar
  56. Woodruff, A., Aoki, P.M., Brewer, E., Gauthier, P. and Rowe, L.A. 1996. An investigation documents from the World-Wide Web. Paper presented at the Fifth International World Wide Web Conference, May, Paris.Google Scholar
  57. Wresch, W. 1996. Disconnected: Haves and Have-Nots in the Information Age. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Wurman, R.S. 1997. Information Architects. New York; Graphis Press Corp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Dodge
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Spatial AnalysisUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations