Advertisement

Linear Stability of the Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layer to Görtler Vortices on a Concave Wall

  • I. G. Girgis
  • J. T. C. Liu
Conference paper
Part of the IUTAM Symposia book series (IUTAM)

Abstract

In this paper, we linearly investigate the compressibility effects on Görtler vortices, caused by the centrifugal instability along a concave surface, in an adiabatic supersonic turbulent boundary layer. The linear solution for such a problem can be used as an appropriate initial condition in the study of the nonlinear development of Görtler vortices. By using appropriate scaling for a compressible turbulent boundary layer together with Morkovin’s hypothesis, the nonlinear three-dimensional parabolic governing equations for Görtler vortices are obtained. The linearized disturbance equations are then obtained and solved numerically using a fmite-difference method with deferred corrections. The obtained stability diagrams are presented and interpreted. It is found that the flow becomes less stable as Mach number increases for turbulent boundary layer; this is due to the increase of the density and the effective viscosity destabilization effects as Mach number increases.

Keywords

Turbulent Boundary Layer Stability Curve Linear Stability Theory Longitudinal Vortex Amplification Ratio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Saric, W. S., Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., Vol. 26, 1994, pp. 379–409.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zakkay, V. and Calarese, W., NASA CR 2037, June 1972.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tani, I., Journal Geophys. Res., vol. 67, No. 8, 1962, pp. 3075–8080.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    So, R.M.C. and Mellor, G.L, Aeron. Quart, Vol. 26, 1974, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sandmayr, G., Deutsche Luft-und Raumfarhrt, 1966, pp. 66–41.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lesieur, M., Comte, P., AGARD-R-819, 1997, pp.4. 1–4. 39.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Floryan, J. M. and Saric, W. S., AIAA, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1982, pp. 316–324.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hall, P. and Malik, M.R., 1989 J. Eng. Math. 23, 239MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Girgis, I.G., Ph.D. thesis, Brown University, 2000.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Hady, N.M.and Verma, A.K., AIAA, Vol. 22, No. 10, 1983, pp. 1354–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coles, D.E., Journal Fluid Mech., Vol. 1, 1956, pp. 191–226.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harris, J. E., NASA TR R-368, Aug. 1971.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kobayashi, R. and Kohama, Y., AIAA, Vol. 15, No. 12, 1977, pp. 1723–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. G. Girgis
    • 1
  • J. T. C. Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Engineering and the CenterFluid Mechanics Brown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations