Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften ((GL,volume 324))

Abstract

Interest in voter models began at about the same time that people started working on the contact process — the mid 1970’s. As was the case for the contact process, these models provided a fertile ground for the use of some of the basic tools in the area of interacting particle systems. In fact, the main reason for their introduction was not so much a desire to model political systems, as the name might suggest, but rather the fact that voter models are exactly the class of spin systems to which duality can be applied most completely and successfully. After applying duality, one was often led to problems involving sustems of random walks, and that provided a close link to one of the most active areas of research in probability of the previous two decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • E. D. Andjel, T. M. Liggett and T. Mountford, Clustering in one dimensional threshold voter models, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 42 (1992), 73–90.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • E. D. Andjel and T. Mountford, A coupling of infinite particle systems II, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 38 (1998), 635–642.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. Bramson, J. T. Cox and R. Durrett, Spatial models for species area curves, Ann. Probab. 24 (1996), 1727–1751.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. Bramson, J. T. Cox and R. Durrett, A spatial model for the abundance of species, Ann. robab. 26 (1998), 658–709.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. Bramson, J. T. Cox and D. Griffeath, Consolidation rates for two interacting systems in the plane, Probab. Th. Rel. Fields 73 (1986), 613–625.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. Bramson, J. T. Cox and D. Griffeath, Occupation time large deviations of the voter model, Probab. Th. Rel. Fields 77 (1988), 401–413.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • D. Chen, The consensus times of the majority vote process on a torus, J. Statist. Phys. 86 (1997), 779–802.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J. T. Cox, Some limit theorems for voter model occupation times, Ann. Probab. 16 (1988), 1559–1569.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J. T. Cox, Coalescing random walks and voter model consensus times on the torus in Z d, Ann. Probab. 17 (1989), 1333–1366.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J. T. Cox and R. Durrett, Nonlinear voter models, Random Walks, Brownian Motion and Interacting Particle Systems, A Festschrift in honor of Frank Spitzer (R. Durrett and H. Kesten, ed.), Birkhauser, 1991, pp. 189–201.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • J. T. Cox and R. Durrett, Hybrid zones and voter model interfaces, Bernoulli 1 (1995), 343–370.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J. T. Cox, R. Durrett and E. A. Perkins, Rescaled voter models converge to super Brownian motion, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. T. Cox and A. Greven, On the long term behavior affinite particle systems: A critical dimension example, Random Walks, Brownian Motion and Interacting Particle Systems, A Festschrift in honor of Frank Spitzer, Birkhauser, pp. 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. T. Cox and D. Griffeath, Occupation time limit theorems for the voter model, Ann. Probab. 11 (1983), 876–893.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • J. T. Cox and D. Griffeath, Critical clustering in the two dimensional voter model, Stochastic Spatial Processes (P. Tautu, ed.), vol. 1212, Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1986a, pp. 59–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • J. T. Cox and D. Griffeath, Diffusive clustering in the two dimensional voter model, Ann. Probab. 14 (1986b), 347–370.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. J. De Oliveira, Isotropic majority vote model on a square lattice, J. Statist. Phys. 66 (1992), 273–281.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • R. Durrett, Multicolor particle systems with large threshold and range, J. Th. Probab. 5 (1992), 127–152.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • R. Durrett and J. E. Steif, Fixation results for threshold voter systems, Ann. Probab. 21 (1993), 232–247.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • I. Ferreira, The probability of survival for the biased voter model in a random environment, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 34 (1990), 25–38.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • B. Granovsky and N. Madras, The noisy voter model, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 55 (1995), 23–43.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • S. Handjani, The complete convergence theorem for coexistent threshold voter models, Ann. Probab. 27 (1999), 226–245.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Liggett, Coexistence in threshold voter models, Ann. Probab. 22 (1994b), 764–802.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • T. S. Mountford, Generalized voter models, J. Statist. Phys. 67 (1992), 303–311.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • M. A. Santos and S. Texeira, Anisotropic voter model, J. Statist. Phys. 78 (1995), 963–970.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • A. Sudbury, Hunting submartingales in the jumping voter model and the biased annihilating branching process, Adv. Appl. Probab. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liggett, T.M. (1999). Voter Models. In: Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes. Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften, vol 324. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03990-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03990-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08529-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03990-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics