Advertisement

Petrophysical Rock Properties

  • F. Jerry Lucia

Abstract

The principal goal of reservoir characterization is to construct three- and fourdimensional images of petrophysical properties. The purpose of this chapter is to review basic definitions and laboratory measurements of the petrophysical properties porosity, permeability, relative permeability, capillarity, and saturation. Pore-size distribution is presented as the common link between these properties.

Keywords

Pore Space Capillary Pressure Relative Permeability Adhesive Force Absolute Permeability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amyx JW, Bass DM Jr, Whiting RL (1960) Petroleum reservoir engineering. McGraw-Hill, New York, 610 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Archie GE (1952) Classification of carbonate reservoir rocks and petrophysical considerations. AAPG Bull 36, 2: 278–298Google Scholar
  3. Arps JJ (1964) Engineering concepts useful in oil finding. AAPG Bull 43, 2: 157–165Google Scholar
  4. Bachu S, Underschultz JR (1995) Large-scale underpressuring in the Mississippian-Cretaceous succession, Southwestern Alberta Basin. AAPG Bull 79, 7: 989–1004Google Scholar
  5. Beard DC, Weyl PK (1973) Influence of texture on porosity and permeability in unconsolidated sand. AAPG Bull 57: 349–369Google Scholar
  6. Dake LP (1978) Fundamentals of reservoir engineering: developments in petroleum science, 8. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 443 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Enos P, Sawatsky LH (1981) Pore networks in Holocene carbonate sediments. J Sediment Petrol 51, 3: 961–985Google Scholar
  8. Harari Z, Sang Shu-Tek, Saner S (1995) Pore-compressibility study of Arabian carbonate reservoir rocks. SPE Format Eval 10, 4: 207–214Google Scholar
  9. Hurd BG, Fitch JL (1959) The effect of gypsum on core analysis results. J Pet Technol 216: 221224Google Scholar
  10. Hurst A, Goggin D (1995) Probe permeametry: an overview and bibliography. AAPG Bull 79, 3: 463 – 471Google Scholar
  11. Kozeny JS (1927) (no title available) Ber Wiener Akad Abt Iia, 136: p 271Google Scholar
  12. Lucia FJ (1995) Rock-Fabric/petrophysical classification of carbonate pore space for reservoir characterization. AAPG Bull 79, 9: 1275–1300Google Scholar
  13. Osborne MJ, Swarbrick RE (1997) Mechanisms for generating overpressure in sedimentary basins: a reevaluation. AAPG Bull 81, 6: 1023–1041Google Scholar
  14. Pittman ED (1992) Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection-capillary pressure curves for sandstone. AAPG Bull 72, 2: 191–198Google Scholar
  15. Schmoker JW, Krystinic KB, Halley RB (1985) Selected characteristics of limestone and dolomite reservoirs in the United States. AAPG Bull 69, 5: 733–741Google Scholar
  16. Smolen JJ, Litsey LR (1977) Formation evaluation using wireline formation tester pressure data. SPE paper 6822, presented at SPE-AIME 1977 Fall Meeting, Oct 6–12, Denver, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  17. Swanson BJ (1981) A simple correlation between permeability and mercury capillary pres- sures. J Pet Technol Dec: 2488–2504Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Jerry Lucia
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations