GIS-based Road Location in Sweden: A Case Study to Minimize Environmental Damage, Building Costs and Travel Time

  • Eric Rapaport
  • Folke Snickars
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

The use of geographical information systems (GIS) in physical planning activities continues to grow. One reason for this is the increasing complexity of infrastructure planning in the age of sustainability, creating demands for spatial plans to balance economic, environmental and social interests. Aside from the complexity of demands on planners, tighter economic constraints have required better data management capabilities to update, retrieve, store, integrate and manipulate spatial and non-spatial data. Rapid technological development in the GIS field has implied a need to be able to demonstrate the usefulness of the techniques not only to represent existing spatial data but also to utilise them for policy analysis. The aim of this chapter is to show how a GIS package can be used in the process of road location planning.

Keywords

Europe Remote Sensing Banner 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akinyede J.O. 1990. A geotechnical GIS concept for highway route planning, ITC Journal, 3: 262–269.Google Scholar
  2. Bäckman L 1980. Winter salt effect on the environment, Report 197, Swedish National Road and Transport Reseach Institute, Linköping.Google Scholar
  3. Bäckman L. and Folkeson L. 1995. The influence of de-icing salt on vegetation, ground water and soil along Highway E20 and Road 48 in Skaraborg County during 1994, Report 391A, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping.Google Scholar
  4. Bäckman L. and Folkeson L. 1997. The influence of de-icing salt on vegetation, ground water and soil along two highways in the south-western part of Sweden during 1994, in The 4th International Symposium on Snow Removal and Ice Control Technology, August 11–16, Reno.Google Scholar
  5. Berry J. K. 1993. Beyond Mapping: Concepts, Algorithms and Issues in GIS, GIS WORLD Inc. Fort Collins.Google Scholar
  6. Carver S.J. 1991. Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 5 (3): 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chenowth R. and Gobster P. 1989. The nature and ecology of aesthetic experiences in the landscape, Landscape Journal: 1–8.Google Scholar
  8. Costonis J. J. 1989. Icons and Aliens, University of Illinois Press, Chicago: 44–60.Google Scholar
  9. DeMers M.N. 1997. Fundamentals of Geographical Information Systems, Wiley, New York: 215–224.Google Scholar
  10. Dobson M. 1991. De-icing Salt Damage to Tree and Shrubs, Bulletin 101, Department of the Environment Arboriculture Contact, Forestry Commission, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  11. Eastman J., Weigen J., Kyem P. and Toledano J. 1995. Raster procedures for multi-criteria multiple-objective decisions, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 61 (5): 539–547.Google Scholar
  12. Folkeson L. 1994. Miljöeffekter av vägar, Litteraturöversikt, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Linköping.Google Scholar
  13. Giesa S. 1991. De-icing salt: Its use and effect on road safety and the living conditions of roadside tress and shrubs, in Proceedings of the Conference on Strategic Highway Programs and Traffic Safety on Two Continents, September 18–20, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  14. Hårsman B. 1998. Land use scenarios and their environmental impacts in the Stockholm region, in Snickars F. and Rapaport E. (eds.) Land Use Planning and Regional Air Quality, COST Report, European Commission, Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. Heuvelink GB. and Burrough, P.A. 1993. Error propagation in cartographic modelling using Boolean logic and continuous classification, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7 (3): 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IDRISI. 1995. IDRISI for Windows, Verison 1.0 User’s Guide, Clark University Graduate School of Geography, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  17. Jankowski P. and Richard L. 1994. Integration of GIS-based suitability analysis and multicriteria evaluation in spatial support systems for route selection, Environment and Planning B, 21 (3): 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Janssen R. and Rietveld P. 1990. Multicriteria analysis and GIS: an application to agricultural landuse in the Netherlands, in Scholten H.J. and Stillwell J.C. (eds.) Geographical Information Systemsfor Urban and Regional Planning, Kluwer, Dordrecht: 129–142.Google Scholar
  19. Jeansson E. 1997. GIS as a tool in road investigations: the location of road path between 711 and 709 on the island of Tjorn, West Coast of Sweden, Earth Science Center, Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
  20. Kemp K. 1992. Spatial models for environmental modelling with GIS, in Proceedings 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling Volume 2: 524–533.Google Scholar
  21. Kjems E. and Forsberg A. 1996. Raster-GIS i vejplanlaegning, Landinspektoren, 5: 212–221.Google Scholar
  22. Lindberg J. and Olofsson B. 1997. Risk for salt grundvatten: en studie med hjälp av GIS, Department of Land and Water Resources, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  23. Lupien A.E., Moreland W.H. and Dangermond J. 1987. Network analysis in Geographical Information Systems, Photogrammetic Engineering and Remote Sensing, 53 (10): 1417–1421.Google Scholar
  24. McHarg I. 1969. Design with Nature, Double Day, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Moreno D.D. 1991. GIS supports SWIP environmental decisions, GIS World, 4 (1): 28–33.Google Scholar
  26. Moreno D.D. and Siegel M. 1988. A GIS approach for corridor siting and environmental impact analysis, in GIS/LIS ‘88, Volume 2, Proceedings Third Annual International Conference and Workshops, San Antonio: 507–514.Google Scholar
  27. Pereira J.M.C. and Duckstein L. 1993. A multiple criteria decision-making approach to GIS-based land suitability evaluation, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7 (5): 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rapaport E. 1998. Critical loads and air quality in the Stockholm region, in Snickars F. and Rapaport,E. (eds.) Land Use Planning and Regional Air Quality, COST Report, European Commission Brussels.Google Scholar
  29. Reck H. and Kaule G. 1993. Straßen und Lebensraume. Forschung, Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik, No. 654. Bundesministerium far Verkehr, Abteilung Straßenbau, Bonn-Bad Godesberg.Google Scholar
  30. Scanlon P.F. 1991. Effects of highway pollutants upon terrestrial ecosystems, in Hamilton R.S. and Harrison R.M. (eds.) Highway Pollution, Amsterdam, Elsevier: 281–338.Google Scholar
  31. Strobl J. 1995. Conceptual modelling of spatial diffusion problems — lessons from noise propagation analysis, in GISDATA: GIS and Spatial Models Meeting, June 14–18, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  32. Voogd H. 1983. Multicriteria Evaluation for Urban and Regional Planning, London, Pion.Google Scholar
  33. Vägverket. 1989. Väg och investering, Effektkatalog 17, Vägverket, Borlänge.Google Scholar
  34. Vägverket. 1990. Vägbullerberäkning, Vägverket, Borlänge.Google Scholar
  35. Vägverket. 1994. Vägutformning 94, Report 4, Vägverket, Borlänge.Google Scholar
  36. Vägverket. 1995. Geoplanering, Report 2, Vägverket, Borlänge.Google Scholar
  37. Vägverket. 1996a. Ekologisk bedömning vid planering av vägar och järnvägar, Report 32, Vägverket, Borlänge.Google Scholar
  38. Vägverket. 1996b. Bedömning av ekologiska effekter av vägar och järnvägar, Report 3, Vägverket, Borlänge.Google Scholar
  39. Vägverket. 1997. Redovisning av förstudie, Report 149, Vägverket, Borlänge.Google Scholar
  40. VBB Viak. 1998. GIS Cost Location Analysis, SWECO International, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  41. Willard L. 1980. On preserving nature’s aesthetic features, Environmental Ethics, 4, Winter: 293–310.Google Scholar
  42. Zube E., Sell J. and Taylor J. 1982. Landscape perception: research, application and theory, Landscape Planning, June: 1–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Rapaport
    • 1
  • Folke Snickars
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Infrastructure and PlanningRoyal Institute of TechnologyStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations