Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

In the Spirit of Miyazawa: Multipliers and the Metropolis

  • Chapter
Book cover Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

This chapter begins with a brief description summary of the present condition of the American inner-city neighborhoods, highlighting those aspects that will be addressed in this contribution. The long-standing problems of the American inner-cities are well documented in the literature — see, for example, Goldsmith and Blakely (1991). The variety of strategies for reviving these locales range from allowing them to degenerate into brown fields which can then be redeveloped from scratch, to invoking targeted “territorial” strategies that use carefully selected leading sectors to force an economy-wide multiplier process. This chapter will explore some macro-economic aspects of the territorial approach — especially the size and origin of multiplier processes in inner city neighborhoods, and the role that these might play in a neighborhood’s revival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahuwalia M. and H. Chenery. 1974. “The economic framework.” In H. Chenery, et al. eds. Redistribution with Growth. London, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacha, E. and L. Taylor. 1976. “The unequalizing spiral: a first growth model for Belinda.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey P., and M. Madden. 1981. “Demographic-economic forecasting within an activity-commodity framework.” Environment and Planning, 13, 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey P., M. Madden and M. Weeks. 1987. “A household income and expenditure in extended input-output models: A comparative theoretical and empirical analysis.” Journal of Regional Science 27, 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, P. and A. Rose. 1988. “Extended input-output models and social accounting matrices: progress and potential.” International Conference on Input-Output Models. West Virginia University, Morgantown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, C. 1995. “City redevelopment and the social sector: implications for research and education.” Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. Detroit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessant, J. and S. Cole. 1985. Stacking the Chips: Information Technology and the Distribution of Income. London, Rowman and Allenheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, J., and C. Endres. 1994. “Hidden economic development assets,” Economic Development Quarterly 8, 286–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, B. 1996. “Economic development as inter-firm cooperation: networks, sectors, and clusters.” Working Paper, Rockefeller Institute, Albany, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne R. 1992. “Social Inequity, racial friction and the good society.” Political Economy of the Good Society 2,.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenery, H. and P. Clark. 1959. Interindustry Economics. New York, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 1987. “Growth, equity and dependence in a de-industrializing city region,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 11, 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 1989. “Expenditure lags in impact analysis.” Regional Studies 23, 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 1990. “Indicators of regional integration and the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement.” Canadian Journal of Regional Science 8, 221–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 1992. “A Lagrangian derivation of a general multi-proportional scaling algorithm.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 22, 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 1993. “Cultural accounting in small economies.” Regional Studies 27, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 1994. “A cultural accounting matrix for Buffalo’s East Side neighborhood.” Economic Development Quarterly 8, 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 1996. “Across the border and across the state: spill-over, feedbacks and agglomeration in many-region economies.” Great Lakes Geographer 3, 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, S. 1998. “The socio-economic and regional impacts of an earthquake,” in A.Z. Rose, M. Sinozuka and R. Eguchi eds. Electricity Disruptions in Memphis. Buffalo, New York, National Center for Earthquake Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clavel, P., J. Pitt, and J. Yin. 1996. “The community option in urban policy.” Working Papers in Planning. Ithaca, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J. and E. Thorbecke. 1984. “Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a social accounting matrix framework.” Economic Journal 94, 137–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleau, M. 1984. “A study of the short and long run properties of macroeconomic models by means of an aggregative core model.” In P. Malrange and P. Muet eds. Contemporary Economic Modeling. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fusfield, E. 1973. The Basic Economics of the Urban Racial Crisis. New York, Reinhardt and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith W and Blakeley E. 1992. Separate Societies: Poverty and Inequality in US Cities. Philadelphia, Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottleib, P. 1994. Neighborhood Development in the metropolitan economy: a comprehensive review.“ Discussion Paper, Center for Regional Economic Issues, Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greytak D. 1970. “Regional impact of inter-regional trade in input-output analysis.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 25, 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison B. 1974. “Ghetto economic development.” Journal of Economic Literature 12, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbron, J. 1981. Urban Economics and Public Policy. New York, St. Martins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard W. 1960. Methods of Regional Analysis. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. 1954. “The macroeconomics of income redistribution.” In A. Peacock ed. Income Redistribution and Social Policy. London, Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. 1966. The Structure of the American Economy. (2“ d. Ed.) London, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, E. 1972. “Costs and benefits of public goods for a ghetto: a case study.” In Boulding, K. et al. ed. Transfers in an Urbanized Society. Belmont, MA., Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller R. 1966. “Inter-regional feedback effects in input-output models: some preliminary results.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 17, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller R. 1986. “Upper bounds on the sizes of inter-regional feedbacks in multi-regional input-output models.” Journal of Regional Science 26, 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller R. and Blair P. 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, K. 1968. “Input-output analysis and interrelational multiplier as a matrix.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 8, 39–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa, K. 1976. Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Volume 116. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore F. 1955. “Regional economic reaction paths.” American Economic Review 45, 133148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakland W., Sparrow F. and Stettler H. 1971. “Ghetto multipliers: a case study of Hough.” Journal of Regional Science 11, 337–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piorre, M. and C. Sabel. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide. New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt G. and A. Roe. 1977. Social Accounting for Development Planning. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt, G. and J. Round. 1979. “Accounting and fixed price multipliers in a social accounting framework.” The Economic Journal 89, 850–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranis G. 1969. “Economic dualism at home and abroad.” Public Policy 18, 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanoff E. and Levine S. 1986. “Capacity limitations, inventory, and time-phased production in the sequential interindustry model. ” Papers of the Regional Science Association 59, 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, A. and P. Beaumont. 1989. “Interrelational income distribution multipliers for the US economy.” in R.E. Miller, K.R. Polenske and A.Z. Rose eds. Frontiers in Input-Output Analysis. London, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S and Wachter, M. 1973. “Wage determination, inflation and industrial structure.” American Economic Review 63, 675–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer R. 1973. Income Flows in Urban Poverty Areas. Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipp, S. 1992. “Black entrepreneurship as a measure of Black decentralization.” Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning. Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M. and G. Hewings. 1989. “Error and sensitivity input-output analysis: a new approach.” In R.E. Miller, K.R. Polenske and A.Z. Rose eds. Frontiers in Input-Output Analysis. New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith E. 1990. Perspectives on the Informal Economy. London, University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spratlen, T. 1971. “Ghetto economic development.” Review of Black Political Economy 1, 43–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. 1968. A System of National Accounts-Revision 3. Series F. New York, United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, R. 1973. A system of social matrices.“ Review of Income and Wealth 19, 143–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. (ed.) 1990. African Americans and the Rise of Buffalo’s Post-Industrial City, 1940 to the Present. Buffalo, NY., Buffalo Urban League Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. 1991. “The theories of William Julius Wilson and the Black experience in Buffalo, New York.” Regional Science Review 18, 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. 1979. Macro-Models for Development Planning. Cambridge, MA., MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raa T. 1986. “Dynamic input-output analysis with distributed activities.” Review of Economics and Statistics 68, 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vietorisz, T. and B. Harrison. 1970. The Economic Development of Harlem. New York, Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, M. 1977. “The extension of the UN SNA supply-disposition table for development policy analysis.” Review of Income and Wealth, 237–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K. 1987. “Spatially disaggregated input-output tables: an evaluation and comparison of survey and non-survey results.” Environment and Planning A 19, 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass and Public Policy. Chicago, Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Geography and Planning, University at Buffalo, Amherst, NY, 14226, USA

    Sam Cole

Authors
  1. Sam Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois, 607 S. Mathews, #236, 61801, Urbana, IL, USA

    Geoffrey J. D. Hewings  & Michael Sonis  & 

  2. Department of Geography, Bar Ilan University, 52900, Ramat Gan, Israel

    Michael Sonis

  3. Department of Civic Design, University of Liverpool, P.O. Box 147, L69 3BX, Liverpool, UK

    Moss Madden

  4. Department of Economics, Chukyo University, 101-2 Yagoto-Honmachi, Showa-Ku, Nagoya, Japan

    Yoshio Kimura

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cole, S. (1999). In the Spirit of Miyazawa: Multipliers and the Metropolis. In: Hewings, G.J.D., Sonis, M., Madden, M., Kimura, Y. (eds) Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03947-2_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03947-2_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08533-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03947-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation