Advertisement

Introduction

  • Geoffrey J. D. Hewings
  • Michael Sonis
  • Moss Madden
  • Yoshio Kimura
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

In the last two decades, considerable progress has been made in the development of more sophisticated models of urban and regional economies. It is not merely the expansion in the number of equations or variables, the innovations in solution algorithms or the ease with which large-scale systems can now be solved that has characterized this development. Rather, the extensions that are the most striking seem to be those exploring new and imaginative ways of linking together what had otherwise been separate models or modules into a more comprehensive system of relationships. The primary contributions here have clearly been the links between demographic and economic models and the rapid development in the application of computable general equilibrium models to regional and interregional systems of economies.

Keywords

Income Distribution Income Group Final Demand Computable General Equilibrium Model Fiscal Decentralization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batey, Peter W.J. 1985. “Input-output models for regional demographic-economic analysis: some structural comparisons.” Environment and Planning A 17, 73–99 Google Scholar
  2. Hewings, Geoffrey J.D. and Moss Madden. (eds.) 1995. Social and Demographic Accounting. Cambridge, University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Kalecki, M. 1954. Theory of Economic Dynamics. London, Allen und Unwin.Google Scholar
  4. Miller, Ronald E. 1966. “Interregional feedbacks in input-output models: some preliminary results.” Papers Regional Science Association, 17, 105–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Miller, Ronald E. 1969. “Interregional feedbacks in input-output models: some experimental results.” Western Economic Journal, 7, 57–70.Google Scholar
  6. Miller, Ronald E. 1986. “Upper bounds on the sizes of interregional feedbacks in multiregional input-output models.” Journal of Regional Science26, 285–306 Google Scholar
  7. Miller, Ronald E. and Peter D. Blair. 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Miyazawa, Ken’ichi. 1960. “Foreign trade multiplier, input-output analysis and the consumption function.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 74, 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miyazawa, Ken’ichi. 1966. “Internal and external matrix multipliers in the input-output model.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 7, 38–55Google Scholar
  10. Miyazawa, Ken’ichi. 1968. “Input-output analysis and interrelational multiplier as a matrix.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 8, 39–58Google Scholar
  11. Miyazawa, Ken’ichi. 1971. “An analysis of the interdependence between service and goods-producing sectors.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 12, 10–21Google Scholar
  12. Miyazawa, Ken’ichi. 1976. Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Volume 116. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Miyazawa, Ken’ichi. 1966. “Internal and external matrix multipliers in the input-output model.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 7, 38–55.Google Scholar
  14. Pyatt, Graham, and Alan R. Roe. 1977. Social Accounting for Development Planning. Cambridge, University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Schur, I. 1917. “Uber Potenzreichen, die im Innern des Einheitskreises beschrankt sind.” J. Reine und Angew. Math., 147, pp. 205–232.Google Scholar
  16. Sonis, Michael and Geoffrey J.D. Hewings. 1993. “Hierarchies of Regional Sub-Structures and their Multipliers within Input-Output Systems: Miyazawa Revisited,” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 34, 33–44.Google Scholar
  17. Sonis, Michael and Geoffrey J.D. Hewings. 1995. “Matrix sensitivity, error analysis and internal/external multiregional multipliers,” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 36, 6170.Google Scholar
  18. Sonis, Michael and Geoffrey J.D. Hewings. 1998 “Feedbacks in Input-Output Systems: Impacts, Loops and Hierarchies,” Discussion Paper 98-T-5, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
  19. Sonis, M., Geoffrey J.D Hewings, and Jiemin Guo, 1996. “Sources of structural change in input-output system: a field of influence approach,” Economic Systems Research, 8: 1532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sonis, Michael, Geoffrey J.D. Hewings and Ken’ichi Miyazawa. 1997(a). “Synergetic interactions within pair-wise hierarchy of economic linkages sub-systems,” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 38, 183–199.Google Scholar
  21. Sonis, M., J. Guo and Geoffrey.J.D. Hewings 1997(b). “Comparative analysis of China’s metropolitan economies: an input-output perspective” in M. Chatterji and Y. Kaizhong (eds) Regional Science in Developing Economies,London, Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey J. D. Hewings
    • 1
  • Michael Sonis
    • 2
    • 5
  • Moss Madden
    • 3
  • Yoshio Kimura
    • 4
  1. 1.Regional Economics Applications LaboratoryUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Bar Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael
  3. 3.Department of Civic DesignUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolEngland
  4. 4.Faculty of EconomicsChukyo UniversityNagoyaJapan
  5. 5.Regional Economics Applications LaboratoryUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations