Renal Arteries

  • Martin R. Prince
  • Thomas M. Grist
  • Jörg F. Debatin

Abstract

Renal artery stenosis has long been recognized as a cause of hypertension and end-stage renal disease. Renovascular disease is implicated as the underlying cause in 1 to 5 percent of patients with hypertension and 5 to 15 percent of patients with end-stage renal disease entering dialysis programs each year. A large autopsy study has shown a renal artery steno-sis incidence of 10 percent in patients with diabetes mellitus in combination with hypertension, 22 percent in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and 45 percent in patients with peripheral vascular disease. The availability of cost-effective treatment options, including per-cutaneous transluminal angioplasty and surgical revascularization, have motivated the search for a non-invasive, cost-effective screening modality. Magnetic resonance imaging has been considered promising by many investigators due to its non-invasiveness. In addition, as previously indicated, paramagnetic contrast agents are free of nephrotoxicity.

Keywords

Catheter Ischemia Creatinine Assure Cardiomyopathy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakker J, Beek FJ, Beutler JJ, Hene RJ, de Kort GA, de Lange EE, Moons KG, Mali WP. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 1998; 207: 497–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bass JC, Prince MR, Londy FI, Chenevert TL. Effect of gadolinium on phase-contrast MR angiography of the renal arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 261–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Buzzas GR, Shield CF III, Pay NT, Neuman MJ, Smith JL. Use of gadolinium-enhanced, ultrafast, three-dimensional, spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative evaluation of living renal allograft donors. Transplantation 1997; 64: 1734–1737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Choyke PL, Walther MM, Wagner JR, Rayford W, Lyne JC, Linehan WM. Renal cancer: preoperative evaluation with dual-phase three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205: 767–771.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, Mellone R, Angeli E, Venturini M, Garancini MP, Quartagno R, Bianchi G, Del Maschio A. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997; 205: 689–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Debatin JF, Ting RH, Wegmüller H, Sommer FG, Fredrickson JO, Brosnan TJ, Bowman BS, Myers BD, Herfkens RJ, Pelc NJ. Renal artery blood flow: quantitation with phase-contrast MR imaging with and without breath holding. Radiology 1994; 190: 371–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Debatin JF, Sostman HD, Knelson M, Argabright M, Spritzer CE. Renal magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative detection of supernumerary renal arteries in potential kidney donors. Invest Radiol 1993; 28: 882–889.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Debatin JF, Spritzer CE, Grist TM, Beam C, Svetkey LP, Newman GE, Sostman HD. Imaging of the renal arteries: value of MR angiography. AIR Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 981–990.Google Scholar
  9. Gibson M, Cook G, Gedroyc WM. Case report: renal transplant artery stenosis-three cases where magnetic resonance angiography was superior to conventional arteriography. Br J Radiol 1995; 68: 89–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grist TM, Sproat IA, Kennel TW, Korosec FR, Swan JS. MR angiography of the renal arteries during a breath-hold using gadolinium-enhanced 3D TOF with k-space zero-filling and a contrast timing scan. Proceedings of the ISMRM 4th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition. New York, NY: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1996; 63.Google Scholar
  11. Grist TM. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal artery stenosis. Am J Kidney Dis 1994; 24: 700–712.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hany TF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T, Debatin JE Contrast-enhanced MR-angiography of the renal arteries. Invest Radiol 1998 (in press).Google Scholar
  13. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997; 204: 357–362.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hany TF, Pfammatter T, Schmidt M, Leung DA, Debatin JF. [Ultrafast contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the aorta and renal arteries in apnea]. Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen and der Neuen Bildgebenden Verfahren. [German] Rofo 1997; 166: 397–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson DB, Lerner CA, Prince MR, Kazanjian SN, Narasimham DL, Leichtman AB Cho KJ. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15: 13–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufman JA, Waltman AC, Rivitz SM, Geller SG. Anatomical observations on the renal veins and inferior vena cava at magnetic resonance angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995; 18: 153–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Leung DA, Hoffmann U, Pfammatter T, Hany TF, Rainoni L, Milfiker P, Schneider E, Debatin JE Renovascular disease: a prospective comparison of 3D MR angiography, duplex sonography and conventional angiography. Hypertension 1998 (in press).Google Scholar
  18. Leung DA, Pelkonen P, Hany TF, Zimmermann G, Pfammatter T, Debatin JF. Value of image Ssubtraction in 3D Gd-enhanced MR-angiography of the renal arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 598–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Loubeyre P, Trolliet P, Cahen R, Grozel F, Labeeuw M, Minh VA. MR angiography of renal artery stenosis: value of the combination of three-dimensional time-of flight and three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography sequences. Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 489–494.Google Scholar
  20. Low RN, Martinez AG, Steinberg SM, Alzate GD, Kortman KE, Bower BB, Dwyer WJ, Prince SK. Potential renal transplant donors: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and MR urography. Radiology 1998; 207: 165–172.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyers SP, Talagala SL, Totterman S, Azodo MV, Kwok E, Shapiro L, Shapiro R, Pabico RC, Applegate GR. Evaluation of the renal arteries in kidney donors: value of three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography with maximum-intensity-projection or surface rendering. AIR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 164: 117–121.Google Scholar
  22. Mitty HA, Shapiro RS, Parsons RB, Silberzweig JE. Renovascular hypertension. Radiol Clin North Am 1996; 34: 1017–1036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Prince MR, Schoenberg SO, Ward JS, Londy FJ, Wakefield TW, Stanley JC. Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. Radiology 1997; 205: 128–136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Prince MR, Narasimham DL, Stanley JC, Chenevert TL, Williams DM, Marx MV, Cho KJ. Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the abdominal aorta and its major branches. Radiology 1995; 197: 785–792.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rieumont MJ, Kaufman JA, Geller SC, Yucel EK, Cambria RP, Fang LS, Bazari H, Waltman AC. Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 39–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ros PR, Gauger J, Stoupis C, Burton S, Mao J, Wilcox C, Rosenberg EB, Briggs RW. Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis:feasibility of combining MR angiography, MR renography, and gadopentetate–based measurements of glomerular filtration rate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 1447–1451.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sawicki PT, Kaiser S, Heinemann L, Frenzel H, Berger M. Pervalence of renal artery stenosis indiabetes mellitus-an autopsy study. J Intern Med 1991; 229: 489–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schoenberg SO, Prince MR, Knopp MV, Allenberg JR. Renal MR angiography. MRI Clin N Am 1998; 6: 351–370.Google Scholar
  29. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Bock M, Kallinowski F, Just A, Essig M, Hawighorst H, Schad LR, van Kaick G. Renal artery stenosis: grading of hemodynamic changes with cine phase contrast MR blood flow measurements. Radiology 1997; 203: 45–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Servois V, Laissy JP, Feger C, Sibert A, Delahousse M, Baleynaud S, Mery JP, Meny Y. Two-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of renal arteries without maximum intensity projection: a prospective comparison with angiography in 21 patients screened for renovascular hypertension. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1994; 17: 138–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Siegelman ES, Gilfeather M, Holland GA, Carpenter JP, Golden MA, Townsend RR, Schnall MD. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the renovascular system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 1035–1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, HJ, Bakke SJ. MR angiography of in situ and transplanted renal arteries. Early experience using a three-dimensional time-of-flight technique. Acta Radiol 1993; 34: 150–155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Snidow JJ, Johnson MS, Harris VJ, Margosian PM, Aisen AM, Lalka SG, Cikrit DF, Trerotola SO. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology 1996; 198: 725–732.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Stafford-Johnson DB, Lerner CA, Prince MR, Kazanjian SN, Narasimham DL, Leicht-man AB, Cho KJ. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15: 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Steffens JC, Link J, Grassner J, Mueller-Huelsbeck S, Brinkmann G, Reuter M, Heller M. Contrast-enhanced, k-space-centered, breath-hold MR angiography of the renal arteries and the abdominal aorta. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 617–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tello R, Thomson KR, Witte D, Becker GJ, Tress BM. Standard dose Gd-DTPA dynamic MR of renal arteries. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 421–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walsh P Rofsky NM, Krinsky GA, Weinreb JC. Asymmetric signal intensity of the renal collecting systems as a sign of unilateral renal artery stenosis following administration of gadolpentetate dimeglumine. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 812–814.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin R. Prince
    • 1
  • Thomas M. Grist
    • 2
  • Jörg F. Debatin
    • 3
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Wisconsin — MadisonMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Institute of Diagnostic RadiologyZurich University HospitalZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations