Advertisement

Measuring pollution prevention progress

  • Thomas T. Shen
Part of the Environmental Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

Large quantities of environmental quality data have been collected over the past 50 years by government agencies, industries, and non-governmental organizations. These databases have only limited usages to measure pollution prevention progress. There is a need to collect data on source reduction activities and their effects on waste and release quantities to measure pollution prevention progress. Pollution prevention is an increasingly popular subject, but different users have different measurement needs. Measuring pollution prevention progress sounds deceptively simple. Using a single measure to summarize pollution prevention will be applicable only in the simplest cases.

Keywords

Waste Reduction Source Reduction Toxic Release Inventory Material Accounting Construction Debris 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrew RNL (1989) “Research Needs For Waste Reduction,” background paper prepared for the National Research Council Workshop on Waste Reduction Research Needs, Annapolis, Md., May 8–9Google Scholar
  2. Benforado D (1990) “Measuring Waste Reduction Progress;’ in: Environmental Challenge of the 1990’s, Proceedings of the International Conference on Pollution Prevention: Clean Technologies and Clean Products, USEPA/600/9–90/039, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolstridge JC (1992) “Pollution Prevention Act: Effects and Implications of Industry’s Reporting.” Paper presented at AWMA Annual Meeting in Kansas City, Mo.Google Scholar
  4. Freeman H et al. (1992) “Industrial Pollution Prevention: A Critical Review?’ J. AandWMA, Vol. 42, No. 5, pp. 636–654Google Scholar
  5. Hearne SA and M Ancott (1992) “Source Reduction vs. Release Reduction: Why the TRI Cannot Measure Pollution Prevention;’ in: Pollution Prevention Review, Winter 1991/1992Google Scholar
  6. Hearne SA (1994) Potential Modification to the USEPA Toxics Release Inventory to Better Track Pollution Prevention Achievements. Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, School of Public Health, New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
  7. Pojasek R and LJ Coli (1991) “Measuring Pollution Prevention Progress;’ in: Pollution Prevention Review, Spring 1991Google Scholar
  8. Ryan W and R Schrader (1993) “An Ounce of Toxic Pollution Prevention: State Toxics Use Reduction Laws.” National Environmental Law Center, Center for Public Interest Research, and Center for Policy Alternatives. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. USEPA (1991) “Pollution Prevention 1991: Progress on Reducing Industrial Pollutants.” EPA 21P-3003, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  10. USEPA (1992) Facility Pollution Prevention Guide. Office of RandD, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/R-92/088, MayGoogle Scholar
  11. USEPA (1996) TRI-Phase 3: Expansion of the EPA Community Right-to-Know Program, Issue Paper #3. EPA Office of Pollution Prevention and ToxicsGoogle Scholar
  12. USEPA (1997) Press Release: EPA’s 1995 Toxics Release Data, May 20Google Scholar
  13. USEPA (1998) Toxic Release Inventory: Community Right-to-Know, 1995 TRI Public Data Release. EPA Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/tri/national.htm)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas T. Shen
    • 1
  1. 1.DelmarUSA

Personalised recommendations