In today’s manufacturing systems, robots and material handling facilities flexibly circulate and integrate material flows among distributed, automatic production equipment. Robots and material handling facilities provide two important and unique capabilities into manufacturing systems: (1) dynamic and mixed material flows, and (2) flexible relationships between manufacturing systems and their environment. The first capability is based on the reprogrammability and intelligence of modern material handling devices and robots. Hence, the material flows are changeable rather than fixed. In parallel, because customers, competitors, and suppliers expect the availability of such an integrated and flexible manufacturing system, the second capability is developed.
KeywordsTorque Transportation Editing Dispatch Larus
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alabiso, B., “Transformation of Data Flow Diagram Analysis Models to Object Oriented Design,” OOPSLA’88 Proceedings, pp. 335–353, 1988.Google Scholar
- Askin, R. G. and Standridge, C. R., Modeling and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems, John Wiley and Sons, 1993.Google Scholar
- Cayenne Software Inc. Team Work for Structured Methods,http://www.cayennesoft.com/teamwork/, 1997.
- Csurgai, G., Kovacs, V., and Laufer, J., “A Generalized Model for Control and Supervision of Unmanned Manufacturing Cells,” Software for Discrete Manufacturing, IFIP, pp. 103–112, 1986.Google Scholar
- Furtado, G. P. and Nof, S. Y., “Concurrent Flexible Specifications of Functional and Real-Time Logic in Manufacturing,” Research Memorandum No. 95–1, School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, 1995.Google Scholar
- Furtado, G. P., Huang, C. Y., and Nof, S. Y., “Concurrent Flexible Specifications of Functional and Real-Time Logic in Manufacturing,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Forthcoming, 1998.Google Scholar
- Hitomi, K. and Yoshimura, M., “Operations Scheduling for Work Transportation by Industrial Robots in Automated Manufacturing Systems,” Robotics and Material Flow, S. Y. Nof (ed.), Elsevier, pp. 131–139, 1986.Google Scholar
- Nadoli, G. and Rangaswami, M., “An Integrated Modeling Methodology for Material Handling Systems Design,” Proceedings of the 1993 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 785–789, 1993.Google Scholar
- Nof, S. Y. and Lechtman, H., “Robot Time and Motion,” Industrial Engineering, pp. 38–48, April 1982.Google Scholar
- Nof, S. Y. and Drezner, Z., “Part Flow in the Robotic Assembly Plan Problem,” Robotics and Material Flow, S. Y. Nof (ed.), Elsevier, pp. 197–205, 1986.Google Scholar
- Razouk, R. R., “A Guided Tour of P-NUT (Release 2.2)”, ICS-TR-86–25, Department of Information and Computer Science at the University of California, Irvine, January 1987.Google Scholar
- Sly, D. P., “Plant Design for Efficiency Using AutoCAD and FactoryFLOW,” Proceedings of the 1995 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 437–444, 1995.Google Scholar
- Suri, R., “Quantitative Techniques for Robotic Systems Analysis,” Handbook of Industrial Robotics, S. Y. Nof (ed.), John Wiley and Sons, N. Y., pp. 605–638, 1985.Google Scholar
- Tecnomatix Technologies, ROBCAD TDL Reference Manual, version 2. 2, December 1989.Google Scholar
- Witzerman, J. P., and Nof, S. Y., “Facility Description Language (version 1.1)—User Manual,” Research Memorandum No. 95–5, School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, May 1995a.Google Scholar
- Witzerman, J. P., and Nof, S. Y., “Facility Description Language,” Proceedings of IERCv, Nashville, TN, pp. 449–455, 1995b.Google Scholar