Skip to main content

From the Aggregate Plan to Lot-Sizing in Multi-level Production Planning

  • Chapter
Book cover Modeling Manufacturing Systems

Abstract

The hierarchical approach to production planning is classically used to handle the organization and logistics in complex production systems. It distinguishes several decision levels using different descriptions of the production process. The upperlevel planning horizon is relatively long, and, since the number of time intervals (or buckets) of this horizon is restricted by computational limitations, these buckets are long compared with production cycle times. At this time scale, discrete flows in manufacturing plants can be approximated by continuous flows describing production processes in an aggregated and simplified way. Product flows are generally associated with families of products (Bitran, Tirupati 1993 [4]). In the discrete-time framework used in this study, these flows generate, over each time bucket, important amounts of products, which can be approximately represented by continuous variables. The optimal planned outputs are computed on the basis of forecasted demands and aggregate resource constraints. The results obtained at the aggregate planning level then have to be disaggregated in time and detailed by products and items, taking into account some basic constraints originating from operational levels. As the time horizon is chosen smaller, hard constraints and conflicts increase and continuous variables are less appropriate for describing real phenomena (Agnetis et al. [2]). Other models, of the discrete event type, are needed to schedule production, supplies and sales. Heterogeneous models are obviously hard to combine, and much research effort have been devoted to constructing integrated planning and scheduling schemes (see e.g. Gershwin 1987 [9], Dauzère-Péres, Lasserre 1994 [7]).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.F. Jr. Veinott. Minimum concave-cost solution of Leontief substitution mod-. els of multi-facility inventory systems. Operations Research, Vol.17, No 2, pp.262–291, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Agnetis, C. Arbib, and M. Lucertini. The combinatorial approach to flow management in FMS. In Optimization Models and Concepts in ProductionManagement, P. Brandimarte and A. Villa Eds., pages 107–152. Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Axsater. Aggregation of product data for hierarchical production planning. Operations Research1981.

    Google Scholar 

  4. G.R. Bitran and D. Tirupati. Hierarchical production planning. In Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science Vol. 4 S.C. Graves A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan P.H. Zipkin Eds.pages 523–568. North-Holland, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Brandimarte, W. I kovitch, and A. Villa. Factory level aggregate scheduling: Bridging the gap between optimized scheduling and real time control. In Optimization Models and Concepts in Production Management P. Brandimarte and A. Villa Eds.pages 187–212. Gordon and Breach Publishers, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.W. Clarke, C. Mohtadi, and P.S. Tuffs. Generalized predictive control, parts 1 and 2. Automatica Vol.23, No.2 pp.137–1601987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Dauzère-Péres and J.B. Lasserre. An integrated approach in production planning and scheduling. Springer-Verlag, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.W. Fogarty and T.R. Hoffmann. Production and inventory management. South-Western Publishing Company, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S.B. Gershwin. A hierarchical framework for manufacturing system scheduling. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, Los Angeles, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.W. Grubbström and A. Molinder. Further theoretical considerations on the relationship between mrp, input-output analysis and multi-echelon inventory systems. Intl. J. Production Economics, Vol. 35, pp. 299–311, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J.C. Hennet. A modelling technique for production planning. Manufacturing Systems Vol.21, No.2 pp.107–1121992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.C. Hennet and I. Barthès. Closed-loop planning of multi-level production under resource constraints. In Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium INCOM’98 Nancy (France)1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.C. Hennet and M. Vassilaki. Modélisation et gestion de systèmes de production avec stockages. RAI RO- APII, Vol. 21, pp.3–16, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. Merce J. Erschler, G. Fontan. Consistency of the disaggregation process in hierarchical planning. Operations Research, Vol. 14, no. 3, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Jensen and G. Rozenberg Eds. High-level Petri Nets. Springer-Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J.B. Lasserre and C. Bes. Infinite horizon non stationary stochastic optimal control problem: A planning horizon result. IEEE Trans. Automatic Control Vol. 29, No.9 pp. 836–8371984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.H. Lee, M. Morari, and C.E. Garcia. State-space interpretation of model predictive control. Automatica Vol. 30, No.4 pp. 707–7171994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. W.W. Leontief. Structure of the American Economy 1919–1939. Oxford University Press, New-York, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Maes and L.N. Van Wassenhove. A simple heuristic for multi-item single level capacitated lotsizing problems. Operations Research Letters, Vol.4, No.6, pp.265–273., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Merce, G. Hetreux, and G. Fontan. Planification agrégée et planification détaillée. In Concepts et Outils pour les Systèmes de Production, J.-C. Hennet Ed., pages 23–44. Cepadues, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Salomon. Deterministic Lotsizing Models for Production Planning. LNEMS Vol. 35, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Vassilaki and J.C. Hennet. Modelling and safety stock analysis in a multiproduct industrial process. In Proceedings of the IMACS-IFAC Symposium, Lille, Prance, pp.439–44 2, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Vazsonyi. The use of mathematics in production and inventory control. Management Science, Vol. 1, No. 1 pp.70–85, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hennet, JC. (1999). From the Aggregate Plan to Lot-Sizing in Multi-level Production Planning. In: Brandimarte, P., Villa, A. (eds) Modeling Manufacturing Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03853-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03853-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08483-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03853-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics