Variationalism and Empirio-Criticism. (Exact and Variational Approaches to Fibre Optics Equations)

  • A. V. Mikhailov
Part of the Centre de Physique des Houches book series (LHWINTER, volume 12)

Abstract

There were many interesting attempts to describe solitary wave solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations as particles with internal degrees of freedom and satisfying an effective finite dimensional Lagrangian equations (see, for example [1], [2]). A simplified “Variational Approach” to Lagrangian nonlinear partial differential equations, formulated by D.Anderson in [3], becomes very popular, specially in the non-linear optics community, and hundreds of papers published every year are actually rely on it. Even during the current school quite a big proportion of theoretical works is based upon the variational approach. It is very easy to understand why this approach is so attractive:
  • it is a very universal method, suitable for equations in any dimensions, with external forces and potentials (it does not matter at all whether the equation is integrable or not),

  • often it gives results which look quite similar to numeric simulations,

  • it is an extremely simple approach — one can learn it in a half an hour, obtain a result in the next few days and in a week write a reasonably looking paper which may be well accepted by many very respectable refereed journals, including the Physical Review and specialised optical journals,

  • a simplified finite dimensional dynamical system obtained via this approach may have interesting and rich properties. It is much easier to study such a reduced system than the original problem, etc.

Keywords

Manifold Soliton 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Gorshkov K.A., Ostrovskii L.A. and Pelinovskii E.N., Proc. IEEE 62 (1974) 504.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Gorshkov K.A. and Ostrovskii L.A.,Physica D 3 (1981) 428.ADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Anderson D., Phys. Rev A. 27 (1983) 3135.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Anderson D., Lisak M. and Reichel T., Phys. Rev. A 38 (1988) 1618.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Desaix M., Anderson D. and Lisak M., Phys. Rev. A 40 (1989) 2441.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Kath W.L. and Smith N.F., Phys. Rev. E 51 (1995) 1484.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Kuznetsov E.A, Mikhailov A.V. and Shimokhin I.A., Physica D 87 (1995) 201.MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Turitsyn S.K. and Shapiro E.G., Optical Fiber Technology 4 (1998) 151.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Turitsyn S.K., Gabitov I.R., Laedke E.W., Mezentsev V.K., Musher S.L., Shapiro E.G., Shaefer T. and Spatschek K.H., Opt. Communic. 151 (1998) 117.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Courant R. and Hilbert D., “Methods of Mathematical Physics”, book, vol I., Interscience Publishers LTD., New York, London, 1953.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Morse P.M. and Feshbach H., “ Methods of Theoretical Physics”, book, vol II., McGraw-Hill Book Company, INC., New York, Toronto, London, 1953.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Struwe M., “Variational Methods.Applications to Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations and Hamiltonian Systems”, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, London, 1990.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kuznetsov E.A., “Soliton Stability”, this book.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Turitsyn S.K., Doran N.J., Nijhof J.H.B., Mezentsev V.K., Schaefer T., Forysiak W., “Dispersion-Managed Solitons”, this book.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Mikhailov
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Applied Mathematics DepartmentUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.L.D. Landau Institute for Theoretical PhysicsChernogolovskaRussia

Personalised recommendations