Abstract
One of the best-known paradoxes of voting pertains to the act of voting itself. The paradox is usually phrased as follows: why is it that many — in many countries most — eligible people vote even though the effect of their vote is very marginal and they incur real costs in voting? Certainly people vote for a number of reasons and, thus, suggesting that one motive, viz. instrumental, may be absent is hardly sufficient to make the act of voting paradoxical. Thus, we must take a little closer look at the alleged paradox.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
The practical syllogism is an Aristotelian construct. Its various versions are discussed in extenso by G.H. von Wright (von Wright 1971, 96–118).
A 100% turnout requirement together with the belief that all others vote and support predominantly x would be an example of this highly unusual election.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nurmi, H. (1999). The Paradoxical Act of Voting. In: Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03782-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03782-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08551-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03782-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive