In this chapter we consider competitive markets. Monopoly was discussed in chapter 3. Monopolistic competition and oligopoly, perhaps the most interesting case, is treated in chapter 7. When buyers and sellers are at possibly different locations, spatial dimension enters into markets. Miksch (1951) has recognized the following distinctions.
KeywordsTransportation Resi Undercut Monopoly Oligopoly
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Beckmann MJ, Puu T (1985) Spatial Economics: Density, Potential, and Flow. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Fox K, Sengupta JK (1969) Economic Analysis and Operations Research. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Gosh A, Chakroborti A (1973) Programming and Interregional Input-Output Analysis: An Application to the Problem of Industrial Location in India. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Heady EO (1958) Linear Programming Methods. Iowa State College Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
- Henderson JM (1958) The Efficiency of the Coal Industry; An Application of Linear Programming. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Lefeber L (1958) Allocation in Space, Production, Transport and Industrial Location. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Miksch L (1951) Theorie des räumlichen Gleichgewichts Weltwirts. Archiv 66: 55–47Google Scholar
- Samuelson PA (1952) Spatial Price Equilibrium and Linear Programming. American Economic Review, June, p 283–303Google Scholar