Abstract
This paper compares optimal protectionist trade policies with optimal non-protectionist policies in an environment where governments have private information about the marginal costs of the domestic firms. A country with an efficient firm is always better off not protecting its firm and subsidizing both domestic and foreign firms compared to being protectionist by taxing imports. However, under some circumstances, a country with an inefficient firm does better being protectionist and taxing imports.
I am grateful to David Collie, Bjorn Jorgensen, Semih Koray, Peter Neary, Murat Sertel, Hakan Orbay, Şule Özler and the participants of the 1996 Economic Theory Fest in Istanbul, 1996 European Meeting of Econometric Society in Istanbul, and the III. International Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory in Antalya, for helpful comments and fruitful discussions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aryan, L., “Flexibility versus Commitment in Strategic Trade Policy Under Uncertainty: A Model of Endogenous Policy Leadership,” Journal of International Economics, 1991, 31, 341–355.
Bandyopadhyay, Subhayu, “Demand Elasticities, Asymmetry and Strategic Trade Policy,” Journal of International Economics, 1997, 42, 167–177.
Brainard, S. Lael and David Martimort, “Strategic Trade Policy with Incompletely Informed Policymakers,” Journal of International Economics, 1997, 42, 33–65.
Brander, J. A. and B. J. Spencer, “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry,” Journal of International Economics, 1985, 18, 83–100.
Cooper, R. and R. Riezman, “Uncertainty and Choice of Trade Policy in Oligopolistic Industries,” Review of Economic Studies, 1989, 56, 129–140.
Eaton, J. and G. Grossman, “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy Under Oligopoly,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986, 101, 383–406.
Hwang, H.S. and C.T. Schulman, “Strategic Non-intervention and the Choice of Trade Policy for International Oligopoly,” Journal of International Economics, 1993, 34, 73–93.
Long, Ngo Van and Antoine Soubeyran, “Cost Heterogeneity, Industry Concentration and Strategic Trade Policies,” Journal of International Economics, 1997, 43, 207–220.
Maggi, G., “Strategic Trade Policy under Asymmetric Information,” 1992. Stanford University mimeo.
Neary, P. J., “Cost Asymmetries in International Subsidy Games: Should Governments Help Winners or Losers?,” Journal of International Economics, 1994, 37, 197–218.
Qiu, Larry D., “Optimal Strategic Trade Policy Under Asymmetric Information,” Journal of International Economics, 1994, 36, 333–354.
Qiu, Larry D., “Strategic Trade Policy under Uncertainty,” Review of International Economics, 1995, 3 (1), 75–85.
Shivakumar, R., “Strategic Trade Policy: Choosing Between Export Subsidies and Export Quotas Under Uncertainty,” Journal of International Economics, 1993, 35, 169–183.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Orbay, B.Z. (1999). Protectionism versus non-protectionism under cost uncertainty in Cournot and Stackelberg markets. In: Alkan, A., Aliprantis, C.D., Yannelis, N.C. (eds) Current Trends in Economics. Studies in Economic Theory, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03750-8_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03750-8_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08471-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03750-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive