Airborne GPS Performance during a Photogrammetric Project

  • Paolo Baldi
  • Maria Marsella
  • Luca Vittuari
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 118)


Preliminary results obtained from the analysis of GPS data collected during an airborne photogrammetric project conducted in 1996 over the Island of Vulcano are described. The objective of this study is to determine an optimal processing procedure for obtaining high accuraacy projection center positions for large scale aerial photography applications. GPS measurements were collected using a multi antenna configuration both on the aircraft and on the ground. The performance of standard software for OTF differential kinematic processing was evaluated. In order to use redundant information both rigorous combination of independently computed solutions and simultaneous adjustment of GPS observation from multiple reference stations and mobile receiver were performed. GPS-derived camera projection centers are compared to the results from a aerotriangulation adjustment results. The results indicate that the GPS data can be helpful to preserve the accuracy level when there is a lack of ground control points.


Projection Center Ground Control Point Kinematic Solution Aerial Photogrammetry Multiple Reference Station 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achilli, V., Baldi, P., Baratin, L., Mulargia, F. (1994). First results in applying aerophotogrammetry to Volcanology. Cahiers du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et Seismologique, 8, 183–189.Google Scholar
  2. Ashtech. (1994) — Precise Differential GPS Navigation and Surveying (PNAV) Software User’s Guide, Pre-release version 2, Ashtech Inc., Sunnyvale, California, 316 p.Google Scholar
  3. Colomina I. (1993) — A Note on the Analytic of Aerial Triangulation with GPS Aerial Control, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 59 , No. 11, November 1993, 1619–1624.Google Scholar
  4. Hothem, L., K.J. Craun, and M.A. Marsella (1994). “Operational Experience with Airborne GPS-Controlled Photography at the U.S. Geological Survey,” Proc. of ASPRS and MAPPS Conference, Washington, D.C., pp. 51–63.Google Scholar
  5. Terrasat (1994). “TOPAS Turbo 3.3 User’s Manual,” Hohenkirchen, Germany, 96p.Google Scholar
  6. Seeber G., Boder W., Goldan H., Schmitz M., Wübbena G. (1995) Precise DGPS Positioning in Marine and Airborne Applications. In GPS Trends in Precise Terrestrial, Airborne and Spaceborne Applications, IAG Symposia 115, Springer, 202–21.Google Scholar
  7. Wübbena G. (1989) The GPS adjustment software package GEONAP — Concepts and Models, Proceedings of 5th International Geod. Symp. On Satellite Positioning, Las Cruces, NM, 452–461.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paolo Baldi
    • 1
  • Maria Marsella
    • 2
  • Luca Vittuari
    • 1
  1. 1.Dip. FisicaUniversità di BolognaItaly
  2. 2.DITSUniversità. di Roma “La Sapienza”Italy

Personalised recommendations