Advertisement

WGS 84 — Past, Present and Future

  • James A. Slater
  • Stephen Malys
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 118)

Abstract

The World Geodetic System (WGS) was conceived as a practical geodetic reference system that maintains consistency with the best scientific terrestrial reference system at the time but also retains some stability. It has evolved from its beginnings as WGS 60 to its present manifestation as WGS 84. A significantly improved Earth Gravitational Model and global geoid were released in 1996, and the realization of the WGS 84 reference frame is consistent with the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) 1994 at the 5-cm level. Evaluations of WGS 84 relative to ITRF94 have been made by comparing International GPS Service (IGS) GPS orbits with the National Imagery and Mapping Agency’s precise orbits and by computing WGS 84 positions for a globally distributed set of IGS stations with known ITRF94 coordinates. The results indicate that there is no practical difference between ITRF94 and WGS 84 for mapping, charting, navigation and many survey applications.

Keywords

Global Position System Global Position System Orbit Geodetic Reference System International Terrestrial Reference Frame International Earth Rotation Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cunningham, J. and Curtis, V.L., WGS 84 Coordinate Validation and Improvement for the NIMA and Air Force GPS Tracking Stations, NSWCDD/TR-96/201, Nov. 1996, Dahlgren, Virginia.Google Scholar
  2. Defense Mapping Agency, Technical Report, Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984, DMA TR 8350.2, Second Ed., 1 Sept. 1991.Google Scholar
  3. Lemoine, FG., Smith, D.E., Smith, R, Kunz, L, Pavlis, EC, Pavlis, N.K., Klosko, SM, Chinn, D.S., Torrence, M.H., Williamson, R.G., Cox, CM, Rachlin, K.E, Wang, Y.M, Kenyon, SC, Salman, R, Trimmer, R, Rapp, RH, and Nerem, RS, The Development of the NASA/GSFC and NIMA Joint Geopotential Model, Proc. of the International Symposium of Gravity, Geoid, and Marine Gravity 1996 (GraGeoMar96), Tokyo, Japan, 30 Sep-5 Oct 1996 (in preparation).Google Scholar
  4. Malys, S. and Slater, J, Maintenance and Enhancement of the World Geodetic System 1984, Proc. ION GPS-94, Salt Lake City, Utah, Sept. 1994, pp. 17–24.Google Scholar
  5. McCarthy, D.D., Ed, IERS Standards (1992), IERS Technical Note 13, July 1992, Observatoire de Paris, France.Google Scholar
  6. Moritz, H, “Geodetic Reference System 1980”, Bulletin Geodesique, Vol. 54, No. 3, Paris, France, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. Swift, ER, Gouldman, M.W, Merrigan, M.J. and Curtis, V.L., GPS Orbit Estimation and Station Coordinate Improvement Using a 1992 IGS Campaign Data Set, NSWSCDD/TR-94/267, Oct. 1994, Dahlgren, Viriginia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • James A. Slater
    • 1
  • Stephen Malys
    • 1
  1. 1.National Imagery and Mapping AgencyBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations