Managing Heterogeneous Transaction Workflows with Co-operating Agents

  • M. N. Huhns
  • M. P. Singh


Business operations, including sales, marketing, manufacturing, and design, can no longer be done in isolation, but must be done in a global context, i.e., as part of an enterprise. A characteristic of such enterprises is that their information systems are large and complex, and the information is in a variety of forms, locations, and computers. The topology of these systems is dynamic and their content is changing so rapidly that it is difficult for a user or an application program to obtain correct information, or for the enterprise to maintain consistent information.


Data Item Enterprise Model Agent Figure Enterprise Information System Common Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agha, G. (1986) Actors: A Model of Concurrent Computation in Distributed Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. Ahlsen, M., Johannesson, P. (1991) Contracts in database federations. In: S. M. Deen (Ed.) Co-operating Knowledge Based Systems. Springer-Verlag, London, 293–310.Google Scholar
  3. Ansari, M., Rusinkiewicz, M., Ness, L., Sheth, A. (1992) Executing multi-database transactions. Proceedings 25th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, January.Google Scholar
  4. Attie, P. C., Munindar, P. S., Amit, P. S., Rusinkiewicz, M. (1993) Specifying and enforcing intertask dependencies. Proceedings of the 19th VLDB Conference.Google Scholar
  5. Bukhres, O. A., Chen, J., Du, W., Elmagarmid, A. K., Pezzoli, R. (1993) InterBase: an execution environment for heterogeneous software systems IEEE Computer,26(8), 57–69, August.Google Scholar
  6. Buneman, O. P., Davidson, S. B., Wafters, A. (1990) Querying independent databases. Information Sciences, 52, 1–34, December.Google Scholar
  7. Cannata, P. E. (1991) The irresistible move towards interoperable database systems. First International Workshop on Interoperability in Multidatabase Systems, Kyoto, Japan, April 7–9.Google Scholar
  8. Ceri, S., Widom, J. (1992) Production rules in parallel and distributed database environments. Proceedings of the 18th VLDB Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 339–351.Google Scholar
  9. Collet, C., Huhns, M. N., Shen, W. M. (1991) Resource integration using a large knowledge base in Carnot. IEEE Computer,24(12), 55–62, December.Google Scholar
  10. Elmagarmid, A. (Ed.) (1992) Database Transaction Models. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Mateo, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Georgakopoulas, D., Homick, M., Sheth, A. (1995) An overview of workflow management: from process modeling to workflow automation infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases,3(2), 119–152, April.Google Scholar
  12. Guha, R. V. (1990) Micro-theories and contexts in Cyc part I: basic issues. MCC Technical Report Number ACT-CYC-129–90, Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, Austin, TX, June.Google Scholar
  13. Heimbigner, D., McLeod, D. (1985) A federated architecture for information management. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems,3(3), 253–278, July.Google Scholar
  14. Jin, W. W., Ness, L., Rusinkiewicz, M., Sheth, A. (1993) Executing service provisioning applications as multidatabase flexible transactions. Bellcore Technical Report (unpublished).Google Scholar
  15. Kamath, M., Ramamritham, K. (1996) Bridging the gap between transaction management and workflow management. In: Proceedings of the NSF Workshop on Workflow and Process Automation in Information Systems: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions, May.Google Scholar
  16. Lenat, D., Guha, R. V. (1990) Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the Cyc Project. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Litwin, W., Mark, L., Roussopoulos, N. (1990) Interoperability of multiple autonomous databases. ACM Computing Surveys,22(3), 267–296, September.Google Scholar
  18. Newell, A. (1982) The knowledge level. Artificial Intelligence,18(1), 87–127, January.Google Scholar
  19. Sciore, E., Siegel, M., Rosenthal, A. (1992) Context interchange using meta-attributes. First International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.Google Scholar
  20. Sciore, E., Siegel, M., Rosenthal, A. (1994) Using semantic values to facilitate inter-operability among heterogeneous information systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 19 (2), 254–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sheth, A. P., Larson, J. A. (1990) Federated database systems for managing distributed, heterogeneous, and autonomous databases. ACM Computing Surveys,22(3), 183–236, September.Google Scholar
  22. Siegel, M., Madnick, S. E. (1991) A metadata approach to resolving semantic conflicts. Proceedings of the 17 1 h International Conference on Very Large Database Systems, Spain, September.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, D., Broadwell, M. (1988) The pilot’s associate — an overview. Proceedings of the SAE Aerotech Conference, Los Angeles, CA, May.Google Scholar
  24. Sull, W., Kashyap, R. L. (1992) A self-organizing knowledge representation scheme for extensible heterogeneous information environment IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, (4)2, 185–191.Google Scholar
  25. Tomlinson, C., Scheevel, M., Singh, V. (1991) Report on Rosette 1.1. MCC Technical Report Number ACT-OODS-275–91, Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation, Austin, TX, July.Google Scholar
  26. Tomlinson, C., Attie, P., Cannata, P., Meredith, G., Sheth, A., Singh, M., Woelk, D. (1993) Workflow support in Carnot. IEEE Data Engineering.Google Scholar
  27. Wiederhold, G. (1992) Mediators in the architecture of future information systems. IEEE Computer,25(3), 38–49, March.Google Scholar
  28. Woelk, D. et al. (1995) The Carnot prototype. In: O. A. Bukhres, A. Elmagarmid (Eds.) Object-Oriented Multidatabase Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  29. Woelk, D., Shen, W. M., Huhns, M. N., Cannata, P. E. (1992) Model-driven enterprise information management in Carnot. In: C. J. Petrie Jr. (Ed.) Enteprise Integration Modeling: Proceedings of the First International Conference. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. N. Huhns
    • 1
  • M. P. Singh
    • 2
  1. 1.University of South CarolinaUSA
  2. 2.North Carolina State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations