Abstract
In cognitive science, we are currently witness to a fundamental paradigm shift [for review see, e. g., Varela et al. (1991) and Bechtel and Abrahamsen (1991)]. In the early days of artificial intelligence and cognitive psychology, cognitive processes were assumed to be based on algorithmic computations controlled by formalizable rules which act upon quasi-propositional knowledge about the external world. In recent years, however, more and more cognitive scientists have converted to the idea that functions like perception, problemsolving, or memory emerge from complex interactions in highly distributed neuronal networks which, unlike conventional information-processing systems, are shaped by learning and experience-dependent plasticity. In such networks, information processing does not follow explicit rules, but is based on the self-organization of patterns of activity. This paradigm shift is motivated by the apparent inability of classical models to account for many facets of cognitive processes and, in addition, by their lack of biological plausibility. In the present contribution, we describe this paradigm shift as it occurs in the neurobiology of perception, with particular reference to the visual system. In addition to demonstrating crucial differences, we elaborate basic conceptual assumptions which are common to both the classical neurobiological view on perception and to the more recent connectionist framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barlow, H.B. (1972): “Single Units and Sensation: A Neuron Doctrine for Perceptual Psychology?”, Perception 1, 371–394
Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (1991): Connectionism and the Mind (Blackwell, Cambridge MA)
Biederman, I. (1987):”Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding”, Psychological Review 94, 115–147
Burge, T. (1979): “Individualism and the mental”, in French, P.A., Uehling, T.E. and Wettstein, H.K., eds., Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol. IV (Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis), pp. 73–121
Churchland, P.M. (1989): A Neurocomputational Perspective (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)
Churchland, P.S. and Sejnowksi, T.J. (1992): The Computational Brain (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)
DeAngelis, G.C., Ohzawa, I. and Freeman, R.D. (1995): “Receptive-field dynamics in the central visual pathways”, Trends in Neurosciences 18, 451–458
Dreyfus, H.L. (1992): What Computers Still Can’t Do (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)
Engel, A.K., König, P., Kreiter, A.K., Schillen, T.B. and Singer, W. (1992): “Temporal coding in the visual cortex: new vistas on integration in the nervous system”, Trends in Neurosciences 15, 218–226
Felleman, D.J. and Van Essen, D.C. (1991): “Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex”, Cerebral Cortex 1, 1–47
Heidegger, M. (1989): Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (Klostermann, Frankfurt)
Held, R. (1965):“Plasticity in sensory-motor systems”, Scientific American 11/65, 84–94
Hubel, D.H. (1988): Eye, Brain, and Vision (Freeman, New York)
Kenny, A. (1984): The Legacy of Wittgenstein (Basil Blackwell, Oxford)
Knierim, J.J. and Van Essen, D.C. (1992): “Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey”, Journal of Neurophysiology 67, 961–980
Levine, J. (1995): “Qualia: intrinsic, relational or what?” in Metzinger, T., ed., Conscious Experience (Schöningh, Paderborn), pp. 277–292
Marr, D. (1982): Vision (Freeman, San Francisco)
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1976): Die Struktur des Verhaltens (de Gruyter, Berlin)
Nagel, T. (1974):“What is it like to be a bat?” The Philosophical Review 83, 435–450
Port, R.F. and van Gelder, T. (1995) Mind as Motion. Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)
Singer, W. (1995):“Development and plasticity of cortical processing architectures”, Science 270, 758–764
Singer, W. and Gray, C.M. (1995): “Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis”, Annual Review of Neuroscience 18, 555–586
Spillmann, L. and Werner, J.S., eds. (1990): Visual Perception. The Neurophysiological Foundations (Academic Press, San Diego CA)
Ullman, S. (1991):“Tacit assumptions in the computational study of vision”, in Gorea, A., ed., Representations of Vision (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), pp. 305–317
Varela, F.J., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1991): The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience (MIT Press, Cambridge MA)
von der Malsburg, C. and Singer, W. (1988): “Principles of Cortical Network Organization”, in P. Rakic and W. Singer, eds., Neurobiology of Neocortex (Wiley, New York), pp. 69–99
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Engel, A.K., König, P. (1998). Paradigm Shifts in the Neurobiology of Perception. In: Ratsch, U., Richter, M.M., Stamatescu, IO. (eds) Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03667-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03667-9_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08358-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03667-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive