Abstract
Because of its structure of protons and neutrons which, in the bound nucleus, are sensitive to the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions, the atomic nucleus can serve as a very specific “laboratory” for testing how these basic interactions behave together. It should be possible to probe physics at the intersections of nuclear physics with fields as varied as particle physics (tests of particle properties, tests of the standard model, …), atomic physics, quantum physics and astrophysics (see Fig. 6.1) . The very important issue of nuclear astrophysics will be discussed in much more detail in Chap. 7.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
We begin by referring to the references of Chap. 1 which include a number of books concentrating on general nuclear physics. There, beta decay is presented in some detail. Because beta decay is a particularly important issue a number of books completely devoted to this topic, for example, are given: Holstein, B. (1989) Weak Interactions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. J .)
Strachan, C. (1969) The Theory of Beta Decay (Pergamon, New York)
Wu, C.S., Moszkowski, S.A. (1966) Beta Decay (Wiley, New York)
Here, we are particularly interested in the end-point of the energy spectrum giving information about a possible non-vanishing neutrino mass. This is discussed in detail by Holzschuh, E. (1992) Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 1035
Holzschuh, E., Fritschi, M., Kündig, W. (1992) Phys. Lett. B287, 381
The issue of double beta decay is most important. Geochemical evidence has existed for quite some time but the detailed observation of double beta decay under controlled laboratory conditions is quite recent. We first give a popular text, then some review papers, and a result from recent experiments. Moe, M.K., Rosen, S.P. (1989) Scientific American, November, p. 30
Haxton. W.C. (1983) Comments Nucl. Part. Phvs. 11, 41
Doi, M., Kotani, T., Takasugi, E. (1985) Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 83, 1
Avignone III, F.T., Brodzinski, R.L. (1988) Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 21, 99
Haxton, W.C., Stephenson Jr., G.J. (1984) Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 12, 409
Tomoda, T. (1991) Rep. Progr. Phys. 54, 53
Beck, M. et al. (1993) Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2853
Neutrino physics has become a very extended domain in physics with topics including neutrino mass, neutrino oscillations, solar neutrino production and detection, etc. We cannot give here a detailed account of the many directions of research but we first refer to some books containing extensive reference lists, to a number of popular accounts, and to some recent review papers and a number of the most basic articles that appeared in the scientific literature. Boehm, F., Vogel, P. (1992) Physics of Massive Neutrinos, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
Bahcall, J.N. (1989) Neutrino Astrophysics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
Winter, K. (ed.) (1991) Neutrino Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)
Bahcall, J.N., Davis Jr., R., Wolfenstein, L. (1988) Nature, August 334, p. 487
Bahcall, J.N. (1994) Beam Line , A Periodical of Particle Physics, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Fall, 10
CERN Courier (1995) June, 13
Elliott, S.R., Robertson, R.G.H. (1991) Contem. Phys. 32, No. 4, 251
Haxton, W.C. (1986) Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 16, 95
Lemonick, M.D. (1996) Time, April 8, p. 46
Schwarzchild, B. (1986) Physics Today, June, p. 17
Van Klinken, J. (1995) Ned. Tijdschr. Nat. 11, 199 (In Dutch)
Langanke, K., Barnes, L.A. (1996) Adv. Nucl. Phys. 22, 173
Oberauer, L., Feilitsch von, F. (1992) Rep. Prog. Phys. 55, 1093
Athanassopoulos, C. et al. (1995) Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2650
Bethe, H.A. (1986) Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1305
Bethe, H.A. (1989) Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 837
Hampel, W. et al. (1996) Phys. Lett. B388, 384 — Most recent GALLEX analyses
Hill, J.E. (1995) Phvs. Rev. Lett. 75, 2654
Mikheyev, S.P., Smirnov, A. (1988) Phys. Lett. B200, 560
Wolfenstein, L. (1979) Phys. Rev. D20, 2634
We also mention a couple of review papers that concentrate more on observational aspects of neutrino astrophysics, neutrino—nucleus interactions, and theory of supernovae, thereby putting neutrino processes in the context of astrophysics and astronomy. Brown, G.E. (ed.) (1988) Phys. Rep. 163, 1–204
Koshiba, M. (1992) Phys. Rep. 220, 229
Kubodera, K., Nozawa, S. (1994) Int. J. Mod. Phys. E3, 101
The implications of free neutron decay for our basic understanding of the standard model are discussed in a recent book presenting neutron properties at length with many references Byrne, J. (1994) Neutrons, Nuclei and Matter (Institute of Physics, Bristol)
We also mention a recent popular account of the many facets of the neutron and its decay, as well as two articles about experiments that have set error bars as small as possible: Gribbin, J. (1993) New Scientist, March, p. 41
Byrne, J. et al. (1990) Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 289
Stolzenberg, H. et al. (1990) Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3104
The subject of testing fundamental symmetries [parity invariance (P), time reversal (T) , charge conjugation combined with parity (CP), ...] spans a large field of physics, too. We refer to a number of books in order to accommodate the major part of the older literature on this vast subject: Roberson, N.R., Gould, C.R., Bowman, C.D. (eds.) (1988) Tests of Time Reversal Invariance (World Scientific, Teaneck, NJ)
Sachs, R.G. (1987) The Physics of Time Reversal Invariance (Chicago University Press, Chicago)
A number of review papers concentrating on more recent efforts to test the above symmetries are: Adelberger, E.G., Haxton, W.C. (1985) Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 35, 501
Henley, E.M. (1969) Ann. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 19, 367
Henley, E.M. (1987) Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 20, 387
Van Klinken, J. (1996) J. Phys. G 22, 1239
Wolfenstein, L. (1986) Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 36, 187
Some interesting, more technical articles are given too: Alfimenkov, V.P. et al. (1982) JETP Lett. 35, 51
Hayes, A.C. (1996) TTASCC-P-96–2 Preprint
Müller, A., Harney, H.L. (1992) Phys. Rev. C45, 1955
Severijns, N. et al. (1993) Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 4047
Weidenmüller, H.A. (1991) Nucl. Phys. A522, 293c
Finally we give a few more popular accounts: Boehm, F. (1983) Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 11, 251
Rosner, J.L. (1987) Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 17, 93
6.54 Wolfenstein, L. (1985) Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. 14, 135
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heyde, K. (1998). The Nucleus as a Laboratory for Studying Fundamental Processes. In: From Nucleons to the Atomic Nucleus. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03633-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03633-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08318-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03633-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive