Skip to main content

Democratic Legitimacy and the Role of the Commission

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy ((SEEP))

Abstract

When viewed with the conventional lenses of the separation of powers in national Western political systems, the Commission is an anomaly. It is neither an executor of government policy nor a government accountable to a parliament. It is clear that both its formal and informal roles warrant discussion in terms of democratic theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Burley, A.-M., Weiler, J.: “Europe before the Court: A Political Theory of Legal Integration”, International Organization, 47 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, D.: ‘The 1992 Initiative: Causes and Consequences”, in: A. Sbragia (Ed.): Europolitics: Institutions and Policy-Making in the ‘New’ European Community, Washington (Brookings Institution) 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Report for the Reflection Group, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, M.-G.: “Setting the Agenda for a New Europe: The ERT and EC 1992”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 33, No. 4 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, K.: Elusive Union. The Process of Economic and Monetary Union in Europe, London (Longman) 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. and Spence: The European Commission, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E.: When Knowledge is Power, Berkeley (U. of California Press) 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P.: “Epistemic Communities and the Dynamics of International Environmental Cooperation”, in: Rittberger (Ed.): Regimetheory and international relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritier, A.: Policy-Making by Subterfuges: Interest Accomodation, Innovation and Substitute Democratic Legitimation in Europe, paper, EUI, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (Ed.): Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance, Oxford (Oxford U. Press) 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. and Stewart-Clark, J.: Competition Law in the EC, London (Kogan-Page) 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.: “Multilateralism: An Agenda for Research”, International Journal, XLV (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L.: The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration, Stanford (Stanford University Press) 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. and Scheingold, S.: Europe’s Would-be Polity: Patterns of Change in the EC, N.J. (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs) 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J.: “EC Policy-making: Institutional Considerations”, in: J. Lodge (Ed.): The EC and the Challenge of the Future, London (Pinter) 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, J.-V.: The Community Legal Order, Luxembourg (Office for Official Publications for the EC) 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P.: “The European Commission”, in: R. Keohane and S. Hoffmann (Eds.): The New European Community: Decision-Making and Institutional Change, Boulder (Westview Press) 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G.: “Independence vs. Accountability: Non-Majoritarian Institutions and Democratic Government in Europe”, paper, EUI, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G.: “Structural Policy in the EC”, in: A. Sbragia (Ed.): Europolitics: Institutions and Policy-Making in the New European Community, Washington (Brookings Institution) 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matlary, J.H.: Energy Policy in the European Union, London (Macmillan) 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, F.: The Struggle for Power in Europe: Competition and Regulation in the Electricity Industry, London (RUA) 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, P., Rittberger, V. and Zurn, M.: Regime Theory: State of the Art and Perspectives, in: Rittberger, op.cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, L.: “After 1992: Can The Commission Manage Europe?”, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 51, No.1 (March 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagnon, P. (Ed.): European Competition Policy, London (Pinter) 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N.: The Government and Politics of the European Union, London (Macmillan) 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (Ed): At the heart of the union. Studie of the European Commission, London (Macmillian) 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G.: “Bureaucratic Politics and the Institutions of the EC”, in: Sbragia, op.cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J.: “Playing the Transparency: Consultation and Policy-making in the European Commission”, CEPS paper, Brussels, March 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G.: Jacques Delors and European Integration, Oxford (Oxford University Press) 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, G.: The Men behind the Decisions: Cases in European Policy-making, D.C. Massaccutes (Heath: Lexington) 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W., Zysman, J.: “1992: Recasting the European Bargain”, World Politics, 42 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W.: “Institutions and Collective Action: The New Telecommunications in Western Europe”, World Politics, January, 45, No. 2 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W.: High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation, Berkeley (University of California Press) 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P.: Interests, Powers, and Functions: Emergent Properties and Unintended Consequences, (unpublished paper) Stanford University 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjøstedt, G.: The External Role of the European Community, Westmead, Hampshire (Saxon House) 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underdahl, A.: “Arena or Actor? The Role of IGOs in International Environmental Management”, Memo, Cicero, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahl, R.: “The European Commission’s Leading Role: The Conditions for Effectiveness”, paper presented at the Inaugural Pan-European Conference in International Studies, Heidelberg, 16–20.9.1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, W.: “Staat und (westeuropaische) Integration: Die Fusionsthese”, in: M. Kreile (Ed.): Politische Vierteljahrschrift, special issue 23 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O.: “Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society”, International Organization, 45 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. and Osherenko, G.: Polar Politics. Creating International Environmental Regimes, Ithaca (Cornell University Press) 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieler, J.: “The Transformation of Europe”, Yale Law Review, 100 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matláry, J.H. (1998). Democratic Legitimacy and the Role of the Commission. In: Føllesdal, A., Koslowski, P. (eds) Democracy and the European Union. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03622-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03622-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08333-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03622-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics