Advertisement

Measuring Spatial Variations in Relationships with Geographically Weighted Regression

  • A. Stewart Fotheringham
  • Martin Charlton
  • Chris Brunsdon
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

A frequent aim of data analysis is to identify relationships between pairs of variables, often after negating the effects of other variables. By far the most common type of analysis used to achieve this aim is that of regression in which relationships between one or more independent variables and a single dependent variable are estimated. In spatial analysis, the data are drawn from geographical units and a single regression equation is estimated. This has the effect of producing ‘average’ or ‘global’ parameter estimates which are assumed to apply equally over the whole region. That is, the relationships being measured are assumed to be stationary over space. Relationships which are not stationary, and which are said to exhibit spatial nonstationarity, create problems for the interpretation of parameter estimates from a regression model. It is the intention of this paper to describe a statistical technique, which we refer to as Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR), which can be used both to account for and to examine the presence of spatial non-stationarity in relationships.

Keywords

Parameter Estimate Spatial Variation Geographically Weight Regression Random Coefficient Model Significant Spatial Variation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, M. 1996. A General Maximum Likelihood Analysis of Overdispersion in Generalized Linear Models, Statistics and Computing (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  2. Bowman. A.W. 1984. An Alternative Method of Cross-Validation for the Smoothing of Density Estimates, Biometrika 71: 353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brunsdon, C.F. 1991. Estimating Probability Surfaces in GIS: an Adaptive Technique, in Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Geographical Information Systems, eds Harts, J., Ottens H.F. and Scholten. H.J., 155–163, Utrecht: EGIS Foundation. BrunsdonGoogle Scholar
  4. C.F. 1995. Estimating Probability Surfaces for Geographical Point Data: An Adaptive Kernel Algorithm, Computers and Geosciences, 21: 877–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casetti, E. 1972. Generating Models by the Expansion Method: Applications to Geographic Research. Geographical Analysis 4: 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casetti. E. and J.P. Jones III 1992. Applications of the Expansion Method London: Routledge. Cleveland, W. S. 1979. Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 829–836.Google Scholar
  7. Cleveland, W.S. and S.J. Devlin 1988. Locally Weighted Regression: An Approach to Regression Analysis by Local Fitting. Journal of the American statistical Association 83: 596–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eldridge. J.D. and J.P. Jones III 1991. Warped Space: a Geography of Distance Decay, Professional Geographer 43: 500–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster. S.A. and W.L. Gorr 1986. An Adaptive Filter for Estimating Spatially VaryingGoogle Scholar
  10. Parameters: Application to Modeling Police Hours Spent in Response to Calls for Service, Management Science 32: 878–889.Google Scholar
  11. Fotheringham, A.S. 1992. Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis and GIS, Environment and PlanningA 25: 156–158.Google Scholar
  12. Fotheringham, A.S. 1994. On the Future of Spatial Analysis: The Role of GIS, Environment and Planning A Anniversary Issue: 30–34.Google Scholar
  13. Fotheringham, A.S. and T.C. Pitts 1995. Directional Variation in Distance-Decay, Environment and Planning A 27: 715–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fotheringham, A.S. and P.A. Rogerson 1993. GIS and Spatial Analytical Problems, International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 7: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fotheringham, A.S., Charlton, M. and Brunsdon C.F. 1996a. The Geography of Parameter Space: An Investigation into Spatial Non-Stationarity, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 10: 605–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fotheringham, A.S., Charlton, M and Brunsdon C.F. 1996b. Two Techniques for ExploringNon-Stationarity in Geographical Data, Geographical Systems (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein,H. 1987. Multilevel Models in Educational and Social Research,London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gorr, W.L. and A.M. 011igschlaeger 1994. Weighted Spatial Adaptive Filtering: Monte Carlo Studies and Application to Illicit Drug Market Modeling, Geographical Analysis 26: 6787.Google Scholar
  19. Greig, D.M., 1980. Optimisation, Longman: London.Google Scholar
  20. Hastie T. and Tibshirani, R. 1990. Generalized Additive Models, Chapman and Hall, London. Jones, K 1991. Specifying and Estimating Multilevel Models for Geographical Research, Transactions of The Institute of British Geographers 16: 148–159.Google Scholar
  21. Openshaw, S. 1993. Exploratory Space-Time-Attribute Pattern Analysers, in Spatial Analysis and GIS, eds. Fotheringham A.S. and Rogerson, P.A, 147–163, London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Parzen, E. 1962. On the Estimation of a Probability Density Function and the Mode, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33: 1065–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rees, P. 1995. Putting the Census on the Researcher’s Desk, Chapter 2 in The Census Users’ Handbook, ed. S. Openshaw, 27–81, GeoInformation International: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenberg, B. 1973. A Survey of Stochastic Parameter Regression, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 1:381–397.Google Scholar
  25. Silverman, B.W. 1986. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, London: Chapman and HallGoogle Scholar
  26. Spjotvoll, E. 1977. Random Coefficients Regression Models, A Review, Mathematische Operationsforschung und Statistik 8: 69–93.Google Scholar
  27. Wand, M.P. and Jones, M.C. 1995. Kernel Smoothing, London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Stewart Fotheringham
    • 1
  • Martin Charlton
    • 1
  • Chris Brunsdon
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of NewcastleNewcastle-upon-TyneUK
  2. 2.Department of Town and Country PlanningUniversity of NewcastleNewcastle-upon-TyneUK

Personalised recommendations