Advertisement

Evaluation of Emissions and Emission Factors

  • M. Memmesheimer
  • H. J. Jakobs
  • A. Oberreuter
  • H. J. Bock
  • G. Piekorz
  • A. Ebel
  • H. Hass
  • Johannes Staehelin
  • Kurt Schläpfer
Chapter
Part of the Transport and Chemical Transformation of Pollutants in the Troposphere book series (3373, volume 7)

Summary

The EURAD model has been applied to a summer smog episode in July/August 1990. The transport, chemical transformation and deposition of atmospheric constituents for that episode have been calculated. Emission data estimated by GENEMIS have been used to replace the standard scheme of the EURAD emission model EEM which is based mainly on annual EMEP data. The model simulations are analysed with respect to the differences in model results due to the application of these two different emission data sets. The aim is to improve the results of the EURAD modelling system with reliable emissions of high temporal resolution including detailed information on regional patterns and the composition of anthropogenic and biogenic hydrocarbons.

Keywords

Diesel Engine Emission Factor Vehicle Speed Emission Data Catalytic Converter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adolph D.; Update and temporal resolution of emissions from power plants in GENEMIS, EUROTRAC Annual Report 1993 part 5, GENEMIS, EUROTRAC ISS, Garmisch-Partenkirchen. 1994, pp. 44–53.Google Scholar
  2. Grell G.A., J. Dudhia, D.R. Stauffer; A description of the fifth-generation PENN State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5). NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-398+STR., 1994, pp. 138.Google Scholar
  3. Hass H.; Description of the EURAD chemistry transport module (CTM) version 2, in: A. Ebel, F.M. Neubauer, P. Speth (eds.), Report 83, Institute of Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. Hass H., H.J. Jakobs, M. Memmesheimer; Analysis of a regional model (EURAD) near surface gas concentration predictions using observations from networks. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 57 (1995) 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jakobs H.J., H. Feldmann, H. Hass, M. Memmesheimer; The use of nested models for air pollution studies: an application to a SANA episode, J. Appl. Meteor. 34, No. 6, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. Lenhart L., R. Friedrich; European emission data with high temporal and spatial resolution. in: H. Power, N. Moussiopoulos, C.A. Brebbia (eds.), Air Pollution III, Vol. 2, Computational Mechanics Publications; Southampton, Boston, 1995, pp. 285–292.Google Scholar
  7. Memmesheimer M., H. Hass, H.J. Jakobs, A. Ebel; Simulation of a photo-smog episode in summer 1990, in: P.M. Borrell, P. Borrell, T. Cvita, W. Seiler (eds), Proc. EUROTRAC Symp.’94, SPB Academic Publishing by, The Hague 1994, pp. 858–861.Google Scholar
  8. Bailey J.C., B. Schmidt, M.L. Williams; Speciated hydrocarbon emissions from vehicles operated over the normal speed range on the road, Atmos. Environ. 24A (1990) 43–52.Google Scholar
  9. Becker K.H.; The atmospheric oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons and its impact on photo-oxidant chemistry, in: P.M. Borrell, P. Sorrell, T. CvitaL, W. Seiler (eds), Proc. EUROTRAC Symp.’94, SPB Academic Publishing by, The Hague 1994, pp. 67–74.Google Scholar
  10. Hampton C.V., W.C. Pierson, D. Scl:itzle, T.M. Harvey; Hydrocarbon gases emitted from vehicles on road. 2. Determination of emission rates from diesel and spark ignition vehicles, Env. Sci. Techn. 17 (1983) 699–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hassel D., J. Brosthaus, F. Dursbeck, P. Jost, K.–S. Sonnbom; Das Abgas–Emissionsverhalten von Nutzfahrzeugen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Bezugsjahr 1980, Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministers des Innern, Forschungsbericht 104 05 740/02 (Berichte 11/83). ISBN 3–503–02393–3 (1983).Google Scholar
  12. Hassel D., P. Jost, F.-F. Weber, F. Dursbeck, K.-S. Sonnbom, D. Plettau; Das Abgas-Emissionsverhalten von Personenkraftwagen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Bezugsjahr 1990, Umweltforschungsplan des Bundesministers fir Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, Forschungsbericht UBA-FB 91–042 (1993).Google Scholar
  13. Haszpra L., I. Szilagyi; Non-methane hydrocarbon composition of car exhaust in Hungary, Atmos. Environ. 28 (1994) 2609–2614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. John C., R. Friedrich, J. Staehelin, K. Schläpfer, C. Keller, W.A. Stahel, U. Steinmenn; Emission factors from road traffic from a tunnel study (Gubrist tunnel, Switzerland, Part IV: comparison with the IER module, in prep.Google Scholar
  15. Rijkeboer R.C., P. Hendriksen; Regulated and unregulated exhaust gas components from LD vehicles on petrol, diesel, LPG and CNG, TNO-report 93.OR.VM.029/1/PHE/PR (1993), TNO Road-Vehicles Resarch Institute, Delft, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  16. Staehelin J., K. Schläpfer (eds.), Schlussbericht des Forschungsprojektes “Erfassung von Emissionen des Kraftfahrzeugverkehrs mittels Messungen im Gubristtunnel (Projekt im EUROTRAC-Subprojekt GENEMIS), 1994, Zürich und Basel, Oktober 1994.Google Scholar
  17. Staehelin J., D. Brunner, K. Schläpfer; VOC emission factors from road traffic studies, in: P.M. Borrell, P. Borrell, T. Cvitaä, W. Seiler (eds), Proc. EUROTRAC Symp.’94, SPB Academic Publishing by, The Hague 1994, pp. 444–447.Google Scholar
  18. Staehelin J., K. Schläpfer, T. Burgin, U. Steinmann, S. Schneider, D. Brunner, M. Bäumle, M. Meier, C. Zahner, S. Keiser, W. Stahel„and C. Keller; Emission factors from road traffic from a tunnel study (Gubrist tunnel, Switzerland). Part I: Concept and first results, Sci. Tot. Env. 169 (1995) 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Staehelin J., C. Keller, W. Stahel, K. Schläpfer, U. Steinemann, T. Burgin, S. Schneider; Modelling emission factors of road traffic from a tunnel study (Gubrist tunnel, Switzerland), Environ. Metrics,in press.Google Scholar
  20. Stahel S., C. Keller; Schadstoffmessungen im Gubristtunnel: Bestimmung von Emissionsfaktoren, Kap. 9, in: J. Staehelin und K. Schläpfer (eds.) Schlussbericht des Forschungsprojektes “Erfassung von Emissionen des Kraftfahrzeugverkehrs mittels Messungen im Gubristtunnel (Projekt im EUROTRAC-Subprojekt GENEMIS), Zürich und Basel, Oktober 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Memmesheimer
    • 1
  • H. J. Jakobs
    • 1
  • A. Oberreuter
    • 1
  • H. J. Bock
    • 1
  • G. Piekorz
    • 1
  • A. Ebel
    • 1
  • H. Hass
    • 1
  • Johannes Staehelin
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kurt Schläpfer
    • 4
  1. 1.EURAD-Project, Institute for Geophysics and MeteorologyUniversity of CologneCologneGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Atmospheric ScienceETH-HönggerbergZürichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Carbotech AGBaselSwitzerland
  4. 4.Institute for Energy Economics and the Rationale Use of EnergyUniversity of StuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations