Abstract
This paper describes a simulation which investigates the interaction and relative effectiveness of individualistic and social learning in producing workable budgeting strategies for agents with limited resources and bounded rationality. The simulation is motivated by an attempt to understand interview data collected from a sample of recently retired households about their budgeting behaviour. In particular, the simulation is designed to reflect, in simplified form, the information and decision processes typically available to individuals, given limitations of memory, accuracy and time for calculation. The paper also illustrates the inductive use of interview data as a basis for simulation, contrasting with the process of deductive modelling traditionally used for descriptions of economic activity. The simulation suggests that social learning is of considerable importance and leads to the emergence of differentiation in patterns of activity.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This research is part of Project L122–251–013 funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council under their Economic Beliefs and Behaviour Programme.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aghion, P., Bolton, P., Harris, C. and Jullien, B. (1991) Optimal Learning by Experimentation. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 621–654.
Arifovic, J. (1990). Learning by Genetic Algorithms in Economic Environments. Working Paper 90–001, Economics Research Program, Santa Fe Institute, New Mexico, October.
Arifovic, J. (1994). Genetic Algorithm Learning and the Cobweb Model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 18, 3–28.
Arifovic, J. and Eaton, C. (1995). Coordination via Genetic Learning. Computational Economics, 8, 181–203.
Arthur, W. B. (1991). On Designing Economic Agents that Behave Like Human Agents: A Behavioural Approach to Bounded Rationality. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 81, 353–359.
Banerjee, A.V. (1992). A Simple Model of Herd Behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 797–817.
Banerjee, A.V. (1993). The Economics of Rumours. Review of Economic Studies, 60, 309–327.
Bray, M. M. and Savin, N. E. (1986). Rational Expectations, Learning, and Model Specification. Econometrica, 54, 1129–1160.
Bullard, J. and Duffy, J. (1994). A Model of Learning and Emulation with Artificial Adaptive Agents. Draft Paper, Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, MO, May.
Chattoe, E. (1995). Can Sociologists and Economists Communicate? The Problem of Grounding and the Theory of Consumer Behaviour. Paper presented at the conference Sociology and the Limits of Economics. Liverpool, April.
Chattoe, E. (forthcoming). Modelling Economic Interaction Using a Genetic Algorithm In T. Bäck, D. Fogel and Z. Michalewicz (eds.) The Handbook of Evolutionary Computation. New York: Oxford University Press/IOP Publishing, section G7. 1, 1–5.
Conte, R. and Gilbert, N. (1995). Introduction: Computer Simulation for Social Theory. In N. Gilbert and R. Conte (eds.) Artificial Societies. London: UCL Press, 1–15.
Day, R. H. and Tinney, E. H. (1968). How to Cooperate in Business Without Really Trying: A Learning Model of Decentralised Decision Making. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 583–600.
Deaton, A. (1992). Understanding Consumption. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Deaton, A. and Muellbauer, J. (1980). The Economics of Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellison, G. (1993). Learning, Local Interaction and Coordination. Econometrica, 61, 1047–1071.
Ellison, G. and Fudenberg, D. (1993). Rules of Thumb for Social Learning. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 612–643.
Ellison, G. and Fudenberg, D. (1995). Word-of-Mouth Communication and Social Learning. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 93–125.
Fudenberg, D. and Kreps, D. M. (1988). Learning, Experimentation and Equilibrium in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hardy, R. N. (1983). Homeostasis (second edition). London: Edward Arnold. Kauffman, A. S. and Levin S. (1987). Towards a General Theory of Adaptive Walks on Rugged Landscapes. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 128, 11–45.
Lomborg, B. (1996). Nucleus and Shield: The Evolution of Social Structure in the
Prisoner’s Dilemma. American Sociological Review, 61,278–308.
Reeves, C. R. (1993). Using Genetic Algorithms with Small Populations.
Forrest, S. (ed.). Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms. (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 17–23 July 1993 ).
San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 92–99.
Simon, H. A. (1955) A Behavioural Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chattoe, E., Gilbert, N. (1997). A Simulation of Adaptation Mechanisms in Budgetary Decision Making. In: Conte, R., Hegselmann, R., Terna, P. (eds) Simulating Social Phenomena. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 456. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03366-1_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03366-1_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63329-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03366-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive