Micropropagation of Daphne L.

  • T. R. Marks
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 40)


The genus Daphne L. (Thymelaeceae family) contains approximately 70 species distributed across Europe and temperate and subtropical Asia, with a few representatives in North Africa. All species can be classified as shrubs, and vary in stature between the prostrate D. jasminea (eastern Mediterranean) and the upright D. bholua (eastern Himalayas), which can grow to over 3 m. Daphne plants are grown for their ornamental value in Europe, New Zealand (Christie and Brascamp 1989) and the USA (Gaschk 1989), where they are noted particularly for the fragrance of their flowers, often borne in early spring when few other shrubs are in bloom, and for their generally dwarf growth habit. However, their commercial availability is limited due to their slow growth, and the protracted development of a saleable plant of good form in the nursery. Where they can be readily propagated by seed (D. mezereum, D. laureola and D. pontica) or by cuttings (D. x burkwoodii and D. odora clones and D. cneorum forms) plants are more readily available (Brickell and Mathew 1976). In general, most species are currently underexploited.


Root Induction Axillary Shoot Daphne Species Root Expression Axillary Shoot Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brickell CD, Mathew B (1976) Daphne. The genus in the wild and in cultivation. The Alpine Garden Society, WokingGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruckel D (1989) Propagating Carol Mackie is well worth the effort. Am Nurseryman 170: 62–68Google Scholar
  3. Carosielli LA, Iaffaldano D, Troncone A, Palermo D (1991) Avvelenamento di trote (Salmo gairdneri) e di carpe a specchio (Cyprinus carpio) da Daphne gnidium L. Obiettivi Documenti Veterinari 12: 39–44Google Scholar
  4. Christie CB, Brascamp W (1989) Exflasking high health Daphne plantlets. Comb Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 38: 394–398Google Scholar
  5. Cohen D (1977) Thermotherapy and meristem-tip culture of some ornamental plants. Acta Hortic 78: 381–388Google Scholar
  6. Cohen D, Le Gal PM (1976) Micropropagation of Daphne x burkwoodii Turrill. Comb Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 26: 330–333Google Scholar
  7. Constantine DR, Abbott AJ, Wiltshire SE (1980) Metabolism and experimental morphogenesis in cell and tissue cultures. Rep Long Ashton Res Stn 1979: 72–73Google Scholar
  8. Constantine DR, Abbott AJ, Wiltshire SE (1982) Metabolism and experimental morphogenesis in cell and tissue cultures. Rep Long Ashton Res Stn 1980: 77–78Google Scholar
  9. Debergh PC, Maene LJ (1981) A scheme for commercial propagation of ornamental plants by tissue culture. Sci Hortic 14: 335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Debergh PC, Read PE (1991) Micropropagation. In: Debergh PC, Zimmerman RH (eds) Micropropagation, technology and application. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaschk M (1989) Daphne: the plants. Am Nurseryman 169: 35–43Google Scholar
  12. Howard BH, Jones OP, Vasek J (1989) Long-term improvement in the rooting of plum cuttings following apparent rejuvenation. J Hortic Sci 64: 147–156Google Scholar
  13. Inamori Y, Takeuchi K, Baba K, Kozawa M (1987) Antifungal and insecticidal activities of daphnodorins A, B and C. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 35: 3931–3934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jeanrenaud JP (1984) Lokta (Daphne spp.) and craft paper-making in Nepal. A report on the current status, based on a literature review and preliminary field observations (May 1984-October 1984). Department of Forests, Forest Research and Information Centre, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeanrenaud JP (1985) Propagation and silviculture of lokta (Daphne) in Nepal. Forest Survey and Research Office, Department of Forests, Kathmandu, Nepal, no 43Google Scholar
  16. Jones OP, Webster CA (1989) Improved rooting from conventional cuttings taken from micropropagated plants of Pyrus communis rootstocks. J Hortic Sci 64: 429–434Google Scholar
  17. Kasai R, Lee KH, Huang HC (1981) Genkwadaphnin, a potent anti-leukaemic diterpene from Daphne genkwa. Phytochem 20: 2592–2594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kogiso S, Wada K, Munadata K (1976) Odoracin, a nematicidal constituent from Daphne odora. Agric Biol Chem 40: 2119–2120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamb JGD, Nutty FJ (1986) Observations on the propagation of Daphnes. Plantsman 8: 109–111Google Scholar
  20. Leifert C, Pryce S, Lumsden PJ, Waites WM (1992) Effect of medium acidity on growth and rooting of different plant species in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 30: 171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Z, Chen Y (1986) Some factors which enhance the rapid propagation of Daphne odora Thunb. in vitro. Acta Hortic Sinica 13: 276–280Google Scholar
  22. Linsmaier EM, Skoog F (1965) Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 18: 100–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lloyd G, McCown B (1981) Commercially-feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel, Kalmia latifolia, by use of shoot tip culture. Comb Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 30: 421–437Google Scholar
  24. Loach K (1988) Controlling environmental conditions to improve adventitious rooting. In: Davis TD, Haissig BE, Sankhla N (eds) Adventitious root formation in cuttings. Dioscorides Press, Portland, pp 248–273Google Scholar
  25. Marks TR (1987) Micropropagation of hardy ornamental nursery stock. In: Alderson PG, Dulforce WM (eds) Micropropagation in horticulture. Trent Print Unit, University of Nottingham, pp 71–83Google Scholar
  26. Marks TR (1991) Rhododendron cuttings. I. Improved rooting following “rejuvenation” in vitro. J Hortic Sci 66: 103–111Google Scholar
  27. Marks TR, Myers PE (1992) Effect of explant location upon early culture development in vitro. J Hortic Sci 67: 583–591Google Scholar
  28. Marks TR, Myers PE (1994) Physiological variability arising from in vitro culture is induced by shoot selection and manipulation strategies. J Hortic Sci 69: 1–9Google Scholar
  29. Marks TR, Simpson SE (1990) Reduced phenolic oxidation at culture initiation in vitro following the exposure of field-grown stockplants to darkness or low levels of irradiance. J Hortic Sci 65: 103–111Google Scholar
  30. Marks TR, Simpson SE (1994) Factors affecting shoot development in apically dominant Acer cultivars in vitro. J Hortic Sci 69: 543–541Google Scholar
  31. Marks TR, Wiltshire SE (1985). Weaning. Micropropagation of hardy ornamentals. Rep E Malling Res Stn 1984: 5Google Scholar
  32. Mok MC, Mok DWS, Armstrong DJ, Shudo K, Isogai Y, Okamoto T (1982) Cytokinin activity of N-phenyl-N2032–1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea (thidiazuron). Phytochemistry 21: 1509–1511Google Scholar
  33. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nikaido T, Ohmoto T, Sankawa U (1987) Inhibitors of adenosine 32032,52032-cyclic monophosphate phosphodiesterase in Daphne genkwa Sieb. et Zucc. Chem Pharm Bull 35: 675–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pernthaner A, Langer T (1993) Poisoning with Daphne mezereum in cattle. Wiener Tierarztl Monatsschr 80: 138–142Google Scholar
  36. Richards M (1985) Enclosed mist system for propagation of broad-leaved evergreens. Comb Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 34: 50–53Google Scholar
  37. Ripphausen F (1990) Propagation and nutrition of Daphne cutting and tissue culture plantlets. Comb Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 39: 305–308Google Scholar
  38. Saikia CN, Chaliha BP, Lodh SB, Iyengar MS (1972) Bark of Supkaseng (Daphne cannabina): a unique raw material for paper making. Indian Pulp Pap 26: 42–47Google Scholar
  39. Schum A, Muller C (1987) Vegetative Vermehrung einer Daphne cneorum-Hybride in vitro. Dtsch Baumschule 39: 34–35Google Scholar
  40. Sweet JB, Constantine DR, Sparks TR (1979) The elimination of three viruses from Daphne spp. by thermotherapy and meristem excision. J Hortic Sci 54: 323–326Google Scholar
  41. Topcuoglu A (1948) Production of Daphne (D. oleoides) leaves. Orman Av 20: 112–113Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. Marks
    • 1
  1. 1.Horticulture Research InternationalKentUK

Personalised recommendations