Is Inheritance Legitimate? pp 133-155 | Cite as
Distributive Justice and Inheritance
- 3 Citations
- 121 Downloads
Abstract
It is often argued that a just distribution of wealth is one in which each person’s wealth is proportional to his or her productivity. Let us call this the ‘productivity’ ideal of distributive justice. Some version of it has been held by writers with views otherwise as different as those of the arch-conservative Milton Friedman and the socialist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon.1 In this essay I shall attempt to defend a version of the productivity ideal of distributive justice, and examine its practical implications, especially with regard to inheritance. It is usually thought that the productivity ideal of distributive justice justifies rather conservative policies, policies which, for the sake of assuring that wealth is indeed proportional to productivity, reject governmental aid to the poor or any other interference with the market. Thus support for this ideal usually comes from conservatives.2 I shall try to show, however, that conservative support for the productivity ideal of distributive justice is misplaced; that this ideal, as I shall interpret it at least, does not justify conservative policies.
Keywords
Distributive Justice Chief Executive Officer Productivity Ideal Political Ideal Unnecessary LimitationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Ascher, M.L. (1993): “Curtailing inherited wealth”, Michigan Law Review, 89, pp. 61–151.Google Scholar
- Brirrairr, J.A. (1978): Inheritance and the Inequality of National Wealth, Washington, DC (Brookings Institute).Google Scholar
- Buchanan, A. (1985): Ethics, Efficiency, and the Market, Totowa, NJ (Rowman & Allanheld).Google Scholar
- Cooper, G. (1979): A Voluntary Tax? New Perspectives on Sophisticated Estate Tax Avoidance, Washington, DC (Brookings Institute).Google Scholar
- Duff, D.G. (1993): “Taxing inherited wealth: A philosophical proposal”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 6, pp. 3–62.Google Scholar
- Fiekowsky, S. (1959): On the Economic Effects of Taxation in the United States, Cambridge, MA (Harvard University), unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1962): Capitalism and Freedom,Chicago (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
- Haslett, D.W. (1987): Equal Consideration: A Theory of Moral Justification, Newark, DE (University of Delaware Press); London and Toronto (Associated University Presses).Google Scholar
- Haslett, D.W. (1990): “What is utility?”, Economics and Philosophy, 6, pp. 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haslett, D.W. (1994): Capitalism with Morality,Oxford (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
- Mccaffery, E.J. (1994): “The political liberal case against the estate tax”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23, pp. 281–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mcclelland, D.C. (1961): The Achieving Society, Princeton, NJ (Van Nostrand).Google Scholar
- Mill, J.S. (1965): Principles of Political Economy, with Some of their Applicationsto Social Philiosophy, ed. by V. W. Bladen and J.M. Robson, Toronto (University of Toronto Press); London (Routledge and Kegan Paul) (= Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, Vols. II-III ).Google Scholar
- Proudhon, P.-J. (1876): What is Property?,Princeton (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press )Google Scholar
- Shaw, W. and Barry, V. (Eds.) (1994): Moral Issues in Business, Belmont, CA (Wadsworth).Google Scholar