Advertisement

Bequests Motives and Models of Inheritance: A Survey of the Literature

  • André Masson
  • Pierre Pestieau
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy book series (SEEP)

Abstract

The economic reality of inheritance — a factor of wealth accumulation having an appreciable effect on wealth distribution — is very different from conventional wisdom. One need only recall the stereotyped image of those elderly parents who do without their entire working lives so that they can leave each of their children a small patch of land. Literature offers up anecdotal images: the myth of the uncle in America as rich as Uncle Scrooge, the moral legacy that La Fontaine’s farmer bequeaths his three sons, the inheritance which star-crossed lovers will never receive, oblivious to the fact that ‘the postman always rings twice’, the heir in Labiche’s comedies whose major asset lies in having parents and uncles who are both wealthy and elderly. Besides those stereotypes, inheritance is for the majority associated with the loss of a beloved one and its ensuing consequences for the surviving family. Is inheritance only a private matter like marriage or a mere subject for crime novels, moralizing tales or light comedies — i.e. without economic implications?

Keywords

Human Capital Fiscal Policy Balance Growth Path Intergenerational Transfer Wealth Accumulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altonji, J.G., Hayashi, F. and Kotlikoff, L.J. (1995): Parental Altruism and Inter Vivos Transfers: Theory and Evidence,NBER Working Paper No. 5378.Google Scholar
  2. Arrondel, L. and Laferrère, A. (1996): Capitalist Versus Family Bequest: An Econometric Model with Two Endogenous Regimes, Paris (DELTA), Doc. 96–06.Google Scholar
  3. Arrondel, L., Masson, A. and Pestieau, P. (1997): “Bequest and inheritance: Empirical issues and France-U.S. comparison”, this volume.Google Scholar
  4. Barhaivm, V., Boadway, R., Marchand, M. and Pestieau, P. (1995): “Education and the poverty trap”, European Economic Review, 39, pp. 1257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R.J. (1974): “Are government bonds net wealth?”, Journal of Political Economy, 82, pp. 1095–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G.S. (1974): “A theory of social interactions”, Journal of Political Economy, 82, pp. 1063–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, G.S. (1975): “Human capital and the personal distribution of income: An analytic approach” (Woytinsky Lecture 1967), in: G.S. Becker, Human Capital, New York (Columbia University Press), pp. 94–144.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, G.S. (1989): “On the economics of the family: Reply to a skeptic”, American Economic Review, 79, pp. 514–8.Google Scholar
  9. Becker, G.S. (1991): A Treatise on the Family,Cambridge (Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  10. Becker, G.S. (1993): “The economic way of looking at behavior”, Journal of Political Economy, 101, pp. 385–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Becker, G.S. and Tomes, N. (1979): “An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility”, Journal of Political Economy, 87, pp. 1153–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Becker, G.S. and Tomes, N. (1986): “Human capital and the rise and fall of families”, Journal of Labor Economics,4, part 2, Sl-S39.Google Scholar
  13. Bernheim, B.D. (1989): “A neoclassical perspective on budget deficits”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (2), pp. 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bernheim, B.D. and Bagwell, K. (1988): “Is everything neutral?”, Journal of Political Economy, 96, pp. 308–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernheim, B.D., Shleifer, A. and Summers L.H. (1985): “The strategic bequest motive”, Journal of Political Economy, 93, pp. 1045–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bevan, D.L. (1979): “Inheritance and the distribution of wealth”, Economica, 46, pp. 1153–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bevan, D.L. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1979): “Intergenerational transfers and inequality”, Greek Economic Review, 1, pp. 8–26.Google Scholar
  18. Blinder, A.S. (1974): Towards an Economic Theory of Income Distribution, Cambridge, MA. (MIT Press).Google Scholar
  19. Blinder, A.S. (1976a): “Intergenerational transfers and life cycle consumption”, American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, 66, pp. 87–93.Google Scholar
  20. Blinder, A.S. (1976b): “Inequality and mobility in the distribution of wealth”, Kyklos, 29, pp. 607–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bruce, N. and Waldman, M. (1990): “The rotten kid theorem meets the Samaritan’s dilemma”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, pp. 1165–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Caballe, J. (1991): Endogenous Growth, Human Capital and Bequests in a Life-Cycle Model,University of Barcelona, mimeo.Google Scholar
  23. Cigno, A. (1995): Saving, Fertility and Social Security in the Presence of Self-Enforcing Intra-Family Deals,University of Florence, mimeo.Google Scholar
  24. Cox, D. (1987): “Motives for private transfers”, Journal of Political Economy, 95, pp. 508–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cox, D. (1990): “Intergenerational transfers and liquidity constraints”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, pp. 187–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cox, D. and Raines, F. (1985): “Interfamily transfers and income redistribution”, in: M. David and T. Smeeding (Eds.): Horizontal Equity, Uncertainty, and Economic Well-Being, Chicago (University of Chicago Press), pp. 393–425.Google Scholar
  27. Cox, D. and Rank, M.R. (1992): “Inter-vivos transfers and intergenerational exchange” Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, pp. 304–14.Google Scholar
  28. Cox, D. and Stark, O. (1994): Intergenerational Transfers and the Demonstration Effect, Center, Tilburg University, Progress Report No. 37.Google Scholar
  29. Cremer, H., Kessler, D. and Pestieau, P. (1991): “Intergenerational transfers within the family”, European Economic Review, 35, pp. 359–75.Google Scholar
  30. Cremer, H. and Pestieau, P. (1993): “Education for attention: A Nash bargaining solution to the bequest-as-exchange model”, Public Finance, 48 (supplement), pp. 85–97.Google Scholar
  31. Cremer, H. and Pestieau, P. (1996): “Bequests as a heir `discipline device Journal of Population Economics9, pp. 405–14. Google Scholar
  32. Davies, J.B. (1981): “Uncertain lifetime, consumption and dissaving in retirement” Journal of Political Economy89, pp. 561–77. Google Scholar
  33. Davies, J.B. (1982): “The relative impact of inheritance and other factors on economic inequality”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, pp. 471–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dearden, L., Machin, S. and Reed, H. (1995): International Mobility in Britain, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Working Paper W95/20.Google Scholar
  35. Desai, M. and Shah, A. (1983): “Bequest and inheritance in nuclear families and joint families”, Economica, 50, pp. 193–202.Google Scholar
  36. Diamond, P.A. (1965): “National debt in a neoclassical growth model” American Economic Review55, pp. 1126–50. Google Scholar
  37. Dutta, J. and Michel, PH. (1995): The Distribution of Wealth with Imperfect Altruism, Louvain-la-Neuve (UCL, Core), CORE DP No. 9558.Google Scholar
  38. Friedman, B.M. and Warshawsky, M.J. (1990): “The cost of annuities: Implications for saving behavior and bequests”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 135–54Google Scholar
  39. Gevers, L. and Michel, PH. (1996): Economic Dynasties with Random Intermissions, Louvain-la-Neuve ( UCL, Core), mimeo.Google Scholar
  40. Goldberger, A.S. (1989): “Economic and mechanical models of intergenerational transmission”, American Economic Review, 79, pp. 504–13.Google Scholar
  41. Harbury, C.D. and Hitchens, D.M.W.N. (1979): Inheritance and Wealth Inequality in Britain, London (George Allen und Unwin).Google Scholar
  42. Ihori, T. (1994): “Bequests, fiscal policy and social security” in: T. Tachibanaki (Ed.): Savings and Bequests, Ann Arbor (Michigan University Press), pp. 13766.Google Scholar
  43. Kimball, M.S. (1987): “Making sense of two-sided altruism”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 20, pp. 301–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kotlikoff, L.J. and Spivak, A. (1981): “The family as an incomplete annuities market”, Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp. 372–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laitner, J. (1988): “Bequests, gifts, and social security”, Review of Economic Studies, 55, pp. 275–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laitner, J. (1991): “Modeling marital connections among family lines”, Journal of Political Economy, 99, pp. 1123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lindbeck, A. and Weibull, J.W. (1988): “Altruism and time consistency: The politics offait accompli”, Journal of Political Economy, 96, pp. 1165–82.Google Scholar
  48. Masson, A. (1995): “L’héritage au sein des transferts entre générations: Théorie, constat, perspective” in: CL. ATTIAS-DONFUT (Ed.): La Solidarité Entre Générations, Paris (Nathan), pp. 279–325.Google Scholar
  49. Masson, A. and Pestieau, P. (1991): “Types et modèles d’héritage et leurs implications”, Economie et Prévision, No. 100–101, pp. 31–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Masson, A. and Pestieau, P. (1994): “L’héritage et l’Etat” in: P. Pestieau (Ed.): Héritage et Transferts Entre Générations, Bruxelles (De Boeck), pp. 15–44.Google Scholar
  51. Michel, Px. and Pestieau, P. (1994): Fiscal Policy in a Growth Model with Both Altruistic and Non Altruistic Agents, Louvain-la-Neuve (UCL, Core), Core DP No. 9449.Google Scholar
  52. Modigliani, F. (1975): “The life cycle hypothesis of saving twenty years later” in: M. Parkin (Ed.): Contemporary Issues in Economics, Manchester (Manchester University Press), pp. 2–36 (also in The Collected Papers of Franco Modigliani, ed. by A. Abel, Cambridge (M.I.T. Press), 1980, Vol. 2, pp. 41–75 ).Google Scholar
  53. Modigliani, F. (1986): “Life cycle, individual thrift, and the wealth of nations”, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 297–313.Google Scholar
  54. Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. (1954): “Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data”, in: K.K. Kurihara (Ed.): Post-Keynesian Economics, New Brunswick, NJ (Rutgers University Press), pp. 388436 (also in The Collected Papers of Franco Modigliani, ed. by A. Abel, Cambridge (M.I.T. Press), 1980, Vol. 2, pp. 79–127 ).Google Scholar
  55. Moore, B.J. (1979): “Life cycle saving and bequest behaviour”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1, pp. 78–99.Google Scholar
  56. Pestieau, P. (1991): “Formes d’héritages dans le débat macroéconomique contemporain”, Economie et Prévision, No. 100–101, pp. 201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramsey, F.P. (1928): “A mathematical theory of saving”, Economic Journal, 38, pp. 543–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ricardo, D. (1817): Principles of Political Economy and Taxation,London (Murray).Google Scholar
  59. Richter, W.F. (1992): Bequeathing Like a Principal,University of Dortmund, mimeo.Google Scholar
  60. Samuelson, P.A. (1958): “An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money”, Journal of Political Economy, 66, pp. 467–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shorrocks, A.F. (1979): “On the structure of inter-generational transfers between families”, Economica, 46, pp. 415–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Solon, G.R. (1992): “Intergenerational income mobility in the United States”, American Economic Review, 82, pp. 393–408.Google Scholar
  63. Stark, O. (1995): Altruism and Beyond,Cambridge (Cambridge University Press. Tachibanaki, T. (Ed.) (1994): Savings and Bequests,Ann Arbor (Michigan University Press).Google Scholar
  64. Tomes, N. (1981): “The family, inheritance and the intergenerational transmission of inequality”, Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp. 928–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tomes, N. (1982): “On the intergenerational savings function”, Oxford Economic Papers, 34, pp. 108–34.Google Scholar
  66. Togs, N. (1988a): “Inheritance and inequality within the family: Equal division among unequals, or do the poor get more?”, in: D. Kessler and A. Masson (Eds.): Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, Oxford (Clarendon Press), pp. 79–104.Google Scholar
  67. Tomes, N. (1988b): “The intergenerational transmission of wealth and the rise and fall of families”, in: D. Kessler and A. Masson (Eds.): Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, Oxford (Clarendon Press), pp. 14765.Google Scholar
  68. Weil, P. (1987): “Love thy children. Reflections on the Barro debt theorem”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 19, pp. 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zimmermann, D.J. (1992): “Regression towards mediocrity in economic stature”, American Economic Review, 82, pp. 409–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Masson
  • Pierre Pestieau

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations