Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bequests Motives and Models of Inheritance: A Survey of the Literature

  • Conference paper
Is Inheritance Legitimate?

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy ((SEEP))

Abstract

The economic reality of inheritance — a factor of wealth accumulation having an appreciable effect on wealth distribution — is very different from conventional wisdom. One need only recall the stereotyped image of those elderly parents who do without their entire working lives so that they can leave each of their children a small patch of land. Literature offers up anecdotal images: the myth of the uncle in America as rich as Uncle Scrooge, the moral legacy that La Fontaine’s farmer bequeaths his three sons, the inheritance which star-crossed lovers will never receive, oblivious to the fact that ‘the postman always rings twice’, the heir in Labiche’s comedies whose major asset lies in having parents and uncles who are both wealthy and elderly. Besides those stereotypes, inheritance is for the majority associated with the loss of a beloved one and its ensuing consequences for the surviving family. Is inheritance only a private matter like marriage or a mere subject for crime novels, moralizing tales or light comedies — i.e. without economic implications?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altonji, J.G., Hayashi, F. and Kotlikoff, L.J. (1995): Parental Altruism and Inter Vivos Transfers: Theory and Evidence,NBER Working Paper No. 5378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrondel, L. and Laferrère, A. (1996): Capitalist Versus Family Bequest: An Econometric Model with Two Endogenous Regimes, Paris (DELTA), Doc. 96–06.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrondel, L., Masson, A. and Pestieau, P. (1997): “Bequest and inheritance: Empirical issues and France-U.S. comparison”, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barhaivm, V., Boadway, R., Marchand, M. and Pestieau, P. (1995): “Education and the poverty trap”, European Economic Review, 39, pp. 1257–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R.J. (1974): “Are government bonds net wealth?”, Journal of Political Economy, 82, pp. 1095–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1974): “A theory of social interactions”, Journal of Political Economy, 82, pp. 1063–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1975): “Human capital and the personal distribution of income: An analytic approach” (Woytinsky Lecture 1967), in: G.S. Becker, Human Capital, New York (Columbia University Press), pp. 94–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1989): “On the economics of the family: Reply to a skeptic”, American Economic Review, 79, pp. 514–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1991): A Treatise on the Family,Cambridge (Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. (1993): “The economic way of looking at behavior”, Journal of Political Economy, 101, pp. 385–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. and Tomes, N. (1979): “An equilibrium theory of the distribution of income and intergenerational mobility”, Journal of Political Economy, 87, pp. 1153–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. and Tomes, N. (1986): “Human capital and the rise and fall of families”, Journal of Labor Economics,4, part 2, Sl-S39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D. (1989): “A neoclassical perspective on budget deficits”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (2), pp. 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D. and Bagwell, K. (1988): “Is everything neutral?”, Journal of Political Economy, 96, pp. 308–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B.D., Shleifer, A. and Summers L.H. (1985): “The strategic bequest motive”, Journal of Political Economy, 93, pp. 1045–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, D.L. (1979): “Inheritance and the distribution of wealth”, Economica, 46, pp. 1153–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, D.L. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1979): “Intergenerational transfers and inequality”, Greek Economic Review, 1, pp. 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A.S. (1974): Towards an Economic Theory of Income Distribution, Cambridge, MA. (MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A.S. (1976a): “Intergenerational transfers and life cycle consumption”, American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, 66, pp. 87–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A.S. (1976b): “Inequality and mobility in the distribution of wealth”, Kyklos, 29, pp. 607–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, N. and Waldman, M. (1990): “The rotten kid theorem meets the Samaritan’s dilemma”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, pp. 1165–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballe, J. (1991): Endogenous Growth, Human Capital and Bequests in a Life-Cycle Model,University of Barcelona, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigno, A. (1995): Saving, Fertility and Social Security in the Presence of Self-Enforcing Intra-Family Deals,University of Florence, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. (1987): “Motives for private transfers”, Journal of Political Economy, 95, pp. 508–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. (1990): “Intergenerational transfers and liquidity constraints”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, pp. 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. and Raines, F. (1985): “Interfamily transfers and income redistribution”, in: M. David and T. Smeeding (Eds.): Horizontal Equity, Uncertainty, and Economic Well-Being, Chicago (University of Chicago Press), pp. 393–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. and Rank, M.R. (1992): “Inter-vivos transfers and intergenerational exchange” Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, pp. 304–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. and Stark, O. (1994): Intergenerational Transfers and the Demonstration Effect, Center, Tilburg University, Progress Report No. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H., Kessler, D. and Pestieau, P. (1991): “Intergenerational transfers within the family”, European Economic Review, 35, pp. 359–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H. and Pestieau, P. (1993): “Education for attention: A Nash bargaining solution to the bequest-as-exchange model”, Public Finance, 48 (supplement), pp. 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H. and Pestieau, P. (1996): “Bequests as a heir `discipline device — Journal of Population Economics9, pp. 405–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J.B. (1981): “Uncertain lifetime, consumption and dissaving in retirement” Journal of Political Economy89, pp. 561–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J.B. (1982): “The relative impact of inheritance and other factors on economic inequality”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, pp. 471–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearden, L., Machin, S. and Reed, H. (1995): International Mobility in Britain, Institute for Fiscal Studies, Working Paper W95/20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, M. and Shah, A. (1983): “Bequest and inheritance in nuclear families and joint families”, Economica, 50, pp. 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P.A. (1965): “National debt in a neoclassical growth model” American Economic Review55, pp. 1126–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta, J. and Michel, PH. (1995): The Distribution of Wealth with Imperfect Altruism, Louvain-la-Neuve (UCL, Core), CORE DP No. 9558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, B.M. and Warshawsky, M.J. (1990): “The cost of annuities: Implications for saving behavior and bequests”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 135–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Gevers, L. and Michel, PH. (1996): Economic Dynasties with Random Intermissions, Louvain-la-Neuve ( UCL, Core), mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, A.S. (1989): “Economic and mechanical models of intergenerational transmission”, American Economic Review, 79, pp. 504–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbury, C.D. and Hitchens, D.M.W.N. (1979): Inheritance and Wealth Inequality in Britain, London (George Allen und Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihori, T. (1994): “Bequests, fiscal policy and social security” in: T. Tachibanaki (Ed.): Savings and Bequests, Ann Arbor (Michigan University Press), pp. 13766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball, M.S. (1987): “Making sense of two-sided altruism”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 20, pp. 301–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotlikoff, L.J. and Spivak, A. (1981): “The family as an incomplete annuities market”, Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp. 372–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitner, J. (1988): “Bequests, gifts, and social security”, Review of Economic Studies, 55, pp. 275–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitner, J. (1991): “Modeling marital connections among family lines”, Journal of Political Economy, 99, pp. 1123–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindbeck, A. and Weibull, J.W. (1988): “Altruism and time consistency: The politics offait accompli”, Journal of Political Economy, 96, pp. 1165–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, A. (1995): “L’héritage au sein des transferts entre générations: Théorie, constat, perspective” in: CL. ATTIAS-DONFUT (Ed.): La Solidarité Entre Générations, Paris (Nathan), pp. 279–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, A. and Pestieau, P. (1991): “Types et modèles d’héritage et leurs implications”, Economie et Prévision, No. 100–101, pp. 31–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, A. and Pestieau, P. (1994): “L’héritage et l’Etat” in: P. Pestieau (Ed.): Héritage et Transferts Entre Générations, Bruxelles (De Boeck), pp. 15–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, Px. and Pestieau, P. (1994): Fiscal Policy in a Growth Model with Both Altruistic and Non Altruistic Agents, Louvain-la-Neuve (UCL, Core), Core DP No. 9449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. (1975): “The life cycle hypothesis of saving twenty years later” in: M. Parkin (Ed.): Contemporary Issues in Economics, Manchester (Manchester University Press), pp. 2–36 (also in The Collected Papers of Franco Modigliani, ed. by A. Abel, Cambridge (M.I.T. Press), 1980, Vol. 2, pp. 41–75 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. (1986): “Life cycle, individual thrift, and the wealth of nations”, American Economic Review, 76, pp. 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. (1954): “Utility analysis and the consumption function: An interpretation of cross-section data”, in: K.K. Kurihara (Ed.): Post-Keynesian Economics, New Brunswick, NJ (Rutgers University Press), pp. 388436 (also in The Collected Papers of Franco Modigliani, ed. by A. Abel, Cambridge (M.I.T. Press), 1980, Vol. 2, pp. 79–127 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B.J. (1979): “Life cycle saving and bequest behaviour”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 1, pp. 78–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestieau, P. (1991): “Formes d’héritages dans le débat macroéconomique contemporain”, Economie et Prévision, No. 100–101, pp. 201–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1928): “A mathematical theory of saving”, Economic Journal, 38, pp. 543–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1817): Principles of Political Economy and Taxation,London (Murray).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, W.F. (1992): Bequeathing Like a Principal,University of Dortmund, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1958): “An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money”, Journal of Political Economy, 66, pp. 467–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A.F. (1979): “On the structure of inter-generational transfers between families”, Economica, 46, pp. 415–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solon, G.R. (1992): “Intergenerational income mobility in the United States”, American Economic Review, 82, pp. 393–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O. (1995): Altruism and Beyond,Cambridge (Cambridge University Press. Tachibanaki, T. (Ed.) (1994): Savings and Bequests,Ann Arbor (Michigan University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomes, N. (1981): “The family, inheritance and the intergenerational transmission of inequality”, Journal of Political Economy, 89, pp. 928–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomes, N. (1982): “On the intergenerational savings function”, Oxford Economic Papers, 34, pp. 108–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Togs, N. (1988a): “Inheritance and inequality within the family: Equal division among unequals, or do the poor get more?”, in: D. Kessler and A. Masson (Eds.): Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, Oxford (Clarendon Press), pp. 79–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomes, N. (1988b): “The intergenerational transmission of wealth and the rise and fall of families”, in: D. Kessler and A. Masson (Eds.): Modelling the Accumulation and Distribution of Wealth, Oxford (Clarendon Press), pp. 14765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, P. (1987): “Love thy children. Reflections on the Barro debt theorem”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 19, pp. 377–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, D.J. (1992): “Regression towards mediocrity in economic stature”, American Economic Review, 82, pp. 409–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. André Masson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pierre Pestieau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. SESO-UFSIA, Universiteit Antwerpen, Prinsstraat 13, B-2000, Antwerpen 1, Belgium

    Guido Erreygers

  2. Centrum voor Economie en Ethiek, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Naamsestraat 69, B-3000, Leuven, Belgium

    Toon Vandevelde

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Masson, A., Pestieau, P. (1997). Bequests Motives and Models of Inheritance: A Survey of the Literature. In: Erreygers, G., Vandevelde, T. (eds) Is Inheritance Legitimate?. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03343-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03343-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08301-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03343-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation