Abstract
This paper considers the meaning of the term “simulation” as it is commonly used in economics. A distinction is made between the relatively mechanical task of simulating a pre-existing mathematical model and the far more difficult task of building a simulation of some social process. It is argued that economists almost always use simulation in the first sense and, consequently, find it rather unimportant. Some economic objections to simulation are criticized, because they depend on a restricted understanding of the term, which has not itself been justified. Within a broader understanding of simulation, many of these objections can be shown to be unfounded. In addition, the paper describes a number of phenomena which are more amenable to simulation, in the broader sense, than to the usual type of mathematical economic modelling. The final part of the paper considers one particular, methodologically based, objection to simulation, that the process of developing deductive economic theories has a superior claim to “scientific rigour”. It is argued that, even taking the economic definition of rigour as given, simulation is actually more rigourous than mathematical modelling in several important respects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchian, A.A. (1950) Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58 (3), pp. 211–222.
Anderson, P.W., Arrow, K.J., and Pines, D. eds. (1988) The Economy as an Evolving Complex System, Proceedings of the Evolutionary Paths of the Global Economy Workshop, Santa Fe, New Mexico, September 1987. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
Batten, D.F., Casti, J.L., and Johansson, B. eds. (1987) Economic Evolution And Structural Adjustment. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Chatfield, C. (1993) Editorial — neural networks: Forecasting breakthrough or passing fad? International Journal of Forecasting, 9, pp. 1–3.
Chattoe, E. (1994) The use of evolutionary algorithms in economics: Metaphors or models for social interaction? In: Eva Hillebrand and Joachim Stender, eds. Many-Agent Simulation and Artificial Life, volume 25 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 4883. IOS Press, Amsterdam.
Chattoe, E. (1995) Can sociologists and economists communicate? The problem of grounding and the theory of consumer behaviour. Paper presented at the Conference “Sociology and the Limits of Economics”, Liverpool.
Chiappori, P.-A. (1984) Sélection naturelle et rationalité absolue des entreprises. Revue Économique, 35 (1), pp. 87–108.
Colander, D., and Brenner, R. eds. (1992) Educating Economists. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
Deaton, A., and Muellbauer, J. (1980) Economics and Consumer Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dixon, H., Wallis, S., and Moss, S. (1994) Axelrod meets Cournot: Oligopoly and the evolutionary metaphor part 1.Technical Report 95/8, Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York, July revised November 1994.
Dosi, G., Marengo, L., Bassanini, A., and Valente, M. (1993) Microbehaviour and dynamical systems: Economic routines as emergent properties of adaptive systems. Technical report, Center for Research in Management, University of California (Berkeley).
Engle, R.F., Hendry, D.F., and Richard, J.-F. (1983) Exogeneity. Econometrica, 51 (2), pp. 277–304.
Frank, R., Gilovich, T., and Regan, D. (1993) Does studying economics inhibit co-operation? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (2), pp. 159–171.
Friedman, M. (1953) Essays in Positive Economics, chapter The Methodology of Positive Economics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 3–53.
Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971) The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Gilbert, C.L. (1986) Professor Hendry’s econometric methodology. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48 (3), pp. 283–307.
Hall, R.L., and Hitch, C.J. (1939) Price theory and business behaviour. Oxford Economic Papers, 2, pp. 12–45.
Hendry, D.F. (1988) The encompassing implications of feedback versus feedforward mechanisms in econometrics. Oxford Economic Papers, 40, pp. 132–149.
Hendry, D.F. (1993) Econometric methodology: A personal perspective. In: Bewley, T.F. ed. Advances in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hendry, D.F. (1993) Econometrics: Alchemy or Science? Essays in Econometric Methodology. Basil Blackwell.
Hendry, D.F., and Richard, J.-E. (1982) On the formulation of empirical models in dynamic econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 20, pp. 3–33.
Knight, F.H. (1921) Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Koutsoyiannis, A. (1979) Modern microeconomics. Macmillan, London, second edition. Lakatos, I. (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 95–195.
Lakatos, I. (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 95–195.
Lakatos, I. (1976) Proofs and Refutations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Leontief, W. (1977) Essays in Economics, Volume 2: Theories, Facts and Policies, chapter Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 24–34.
Marwell, G., and Ames, R.E. (1981) Economists free ride, does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics, 15, pp. 295–310.
Mirowski, P. (1989) More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Belknap/Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Nickell, S.J. (1978) The Investment Decisions of Firms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1978.
Pau, L.-F. ed. (1986) Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management, Zürich, 12–14 March 1985. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Roos, J.-L. ed. (1987) Economics and Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the IFAC/IFORS/IFIP/IASC/AFCET Conference, Aix-en- Provence, France, 2–4 September 1986, volume 12 of IFAC Proceedings Series. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Sahal, D. (1983) Invention, innovation and economic evolution. Technological Forecasting and Economic Change, 23 (3), pp. 213–235.
Witt, U. (1986) How can complex economic behavior be investigated? The example of the ignorant monopolist revisited. Behavioral Science, 31, pp. 173–188.
Witt, U., and Perske, J. (982) SMS — A Program Package for Simulating and Gaming of Stochastic Market Processes and Learning Behaviour, volume 202 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chattoe, E. (1996). Why Are We Simulating Anyway? Some Answers from Economics. In: Troitzsch, K.G., Mueller, U., Gilbert, G.N., Doran, J.E. (eds) Social Science Microsimulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03261-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03261-9_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08267-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03261-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive