Three-Dimensional Photon Beam Calculations
In radiation treatment of cancer it is necessary to: (a) accurately define the extent of disease, (b) customize radiation treatment delivery of required dose to diseased tissues while minimizing dose to normal surrounding tissue, and (c) verify that the delivered dose is the amount planned. Attention to all these issues is essential to design a treatment regimen that controls the disease without causing serious complications to normal critical structures. In most clinical cases direct measurement of the dose delivered to the tumor and normal tissue is not possible.Thus the radiation oncologist depends on the calculated dose distribution to evaluate the appropriateness of a particular treatment plan. Clinical studies have documented that small changes of ±5% in the dose delivered can result in significant differences in complication-free local control of disease (ICRU Report 24,1976).
KeywordsDose Distribution Energy Deposition Dose Calculation Scattered Photon Energy Fluence
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Dutreix J, Bernard M(1966) Dosimetry at interfaces for high energy X and gamma rays. Br J Radio 10: 177–190Google Scholar
- Halbleib JA, Kansek RP, Mehlhorn TA, Valdez CD, Selter SM, Berger MJ (1992) ITS Version 3.0 the Integrated TIGER Server of Coupled Electron/Photon Monte Carlo Transport Codes”, SAND 91–1634Google Scholar
- ICRU, Report 33 (1980) International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements Radiation Quantities and Unit ICRU Report 33, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- ICRU, Report 24 (1976) Determination of the absorbed dose in a patient irradiated by beams of X or gamma rays in radiation therapy procedures. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Johns HE, Cunningham JE(1983) The physics of radiology, 4th edn. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, ILL., Chap 7Google Scholar
- Morrel JE (1987) Boltzmann-Fokker-Planck calculations using standard discrete ordinate codes. Los Alamos National Labs LA-UR Report 83–229Google Scholar
- Nelson WR, Hirayama H, Roger DWO (1985) The EGS code system Stanford linear accelerator center. Internal Report SLAC 265Google Scholar