Abstract
Preventing occupational (and nonoccupational) contact dermatitis is the cornerstone of all our projects. It is crucial that over the next few years the number of cases be reduced. This is particularly true for certain occupations: bakers, hairdressers, the staff of hospitals, nursing homes and restaurants, and many others (see Chap. 11). Two types of considerations must be borne in mind: individual aspects (some workers are disabled by many interruptions to their activities in the course of a year) and socio-economical aspects. Prevention is a difficult task, with many different facets, including both general and individual measures of protection [1]; unavoidably, it also implies a wide range of treatment procedures. There is a general principle: general measures of prevention and protection are more effective than individual measures, since the latter depend upon the personal will and constant application of each individual worker; it is clear that preventive dermatology is not yet accepted as a routine procedure [2]. In most industrialized countries, a relatively safe working environment is provided by most of the largest plants [3]. Nevertheless, at other workplaces contacts with irritants and/or allergens could be avoided more effectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lachapelle JM (1984) Abrégé de dermatologie professionnelle. Masson, Paris
Lachapelle JM (1990) A European overview of occupational dermatology. Occup Health Rev 27: 21–24
Adams RH (1990) Prevention, rehabilitation, treatment. Adams RM (ed) Saunders, Philadelphia, Occupational skin diseases 2nd Edn, pp 261–279
Mathias CGT, Morrison JH (1988) Occupational skin disease, United States. Arch Dermatol 124: 1519 —1524
Lachapelle JM (1987) Industrial airborne irritant contact dermatitis due to dust particles. Boll Dermatol Allerg Prof 2: 83–89
Lachapelle JM (1984) Occupational airborne irritant contact dermatitis to slag. Contact Dermatitis 10: 315–316
Liden C, Brehmer-Andersson E (1988) Occupational dermatoses from colour developing agents. Clinical and histopathological observations. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 68: 514–522
Liden C, Sollenberg J, Hansen L, Arvidson A (1989) Contact allergy to colour developing agents. Analysis of test preparations, bulk chemicals and tank solutions by high-performance liquid chromatography. Derm Beruf Umwelt 37: 47–52
Thorgeirsson A, Fregert S, Fammas 0 (1978) Sensitization capacity of epoxy resin oligomers in the guinea pig. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 58: 17–21
Calnan CD (1978) Chromate in coolant water of gramophone record presses. Contact Dermatitis 4: 246–247
Lachapelle JM, Lauwerys R, Tennstedt D, Andanson J, Benezra C, Chabeau G, Ducombs G, Foussereau J, Lacroix M, Martin P (1980) Eau de Javel and prevention of chromate allergy in France. Contact Dermatitis 6: 107–110
Cohen SR (1988) Sources of information for occupational dermatology. Dermatol Clin 6: 15–19
Rycroft RJG (1988) Looking at work dermatologically. Dermatol Clin 6: 1–5
Rycroft RJG (1986) Occupational site survey: principles and significance. In: Maibach HI (ed) Occupational and industrial dermatology, 2nd edn. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, pp 3–5
Berardinelli SP (1988) Prevention of occupational skin disease through use of chemical protective gloves. Dermatol Clin 6: 115–119
Estlander T, Jolanki R (1988) How to protect the hands. Dermatol Clin 6: 105–114
Roed-Petersen J (1989) A new glove material protective against epoxy and acrylate monomer. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJ, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 603–606
Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM (1987) Uses of a guinea pig model to evaluate the protective value of barrier creams and/or gels. In: Maibach HI, Lowe NJ (eds) Models in dermatology, vol 3. Karger, Basel, pp 112–120
Nouaigui H, Antoine JL, Lachapelle JM (1988) Evaluation expérimentale du pouvoir protecteur d’une crème siliconée versus son excipient vis-à-vis de I’irritation cutanée par soude caustique. Arch Mal Prof 49: 383–387
Nouaigui H, Antoine JL, Masmoudi ML, van Neste D, Lachapelle JM (1989) Etudes invasive et non invasive du pouvoir protecteur d’une crème siliconée et de son excipient vis-à-vis de I’irritation cutanée induite par le laurylsulfate de sodium. Ann Dermatol Venereol 116: 389–398
Frosch PJ, Schulze-Dirks A, Hoffmann M, Axthelm I, Kurte A (1993) Efficacy of skin barrier creams, I. The repetitive irritation test ( RIT) in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 28: 94–100
Frosch PJ, Schulze-Dirks A, Hoffmann M, Axthelm I (1993) Evaluation of skin barrier creams, II. Ineffectiveness of a popular “skin protector” against various irritants in the repetitive irritation test in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 29: 74–77
Frosch PJ, Kurte A, Pilz B (1993) Efficacy of skin barrier creams, III. The repetitive irritation test ( RIT) in humans. Contact Dermatitis 29: 113–118
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lachapelle, JM. (1995). Principles of Prevention and Protection in Contact Dermatitis (with Special Reference to Occupational Dermatology). In: Rycroft, R.J.G., Menné, T., Frosch, P.J. (eds) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03104-9_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03104-9_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-03106-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03104-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive