Shoe contact dermatitis is typical of many instances of contact dermatitis in that the pattern of presentation suggests the diagnosis but the causative allergen is elusive [1].


Natural Rubber Contact Dermatitis Allergic Contact Dermatitis Natural Rubber Latex Ethyl Vinyl Acetate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Storrs F (1986) Dermatitis from clothing and shoes. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 283Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rietschel RL (1984) Role of socks in shoe dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 120: 398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maibach H (1984) Panty hose dermatitis resembling and complicating tinea pedis. Contact Dermatitis 1: 329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thorstensen TC (1985) Practical leather technology, 3rd edn. Krieger, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Babbit RO (1978) The Vanderbilt rubber handbook. VanderbiltGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lammintausta K, Kalimo K (1985) Sensitivity to rubber. Study with rubber mixes and individual rubber chemicals. Dermatosen 33: 204–208Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fogh A, Pock-Steen B (1992) Contact sensitivity to thiram in wooden shoes. Contact Dermatitis 27: 348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Roberts JL, Hanifin JM (1979) Athletic shoe dermatitis, contact allergy to ethylbutyl thiourea. JAMA 241: 275–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roberts JL, Hanifin JM (1980) Contact allergy and cross reactivity to substituted thiourea compounds. Contact Dermatitis 6: 138–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaniwa M-A, Momma J, Ikarashi Y, Kojima S, Nakamura A, Nakaji Y, Kurokawa Y, Kantoh H, Itoh M (1992) A method for identifying causative chemicals of allergic contact dermatitis using a combination of chemical analysis and patch testing in patients and animal groups: application to a case of rubber boot dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 27: 166–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cronin E (1980) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p 738Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Malten K, Seutter E (1985) Allergic degradation products of paratertiary butyl phenol formaldehyde plastic. Contact Dermatitis 12: 222–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Malten KE, Rath R, Pasters HM (1983) Paratertiary butyl phenol formaldehyde and other causes of shoe dermatitis. Dermatosen 5: 149–153Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malten KE (1967) Contact sensitizations caused by paratertiary butyl phenol and certain phenol formaldehyde-containing glues. Dermatologica 135: 541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mathias TCE, Maibach H (1979) Polyvinylchloride workboots in the management of shoe dermatitis in industrial workers. Contact Dermatitis 5: 249–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia Podmore

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations