Spot Tests and Chemical Analyses for Allergen Evaluation

  • Leon M. Wall


The announcement of a positive patch test can be a confusing affair for a patient if he or she is then told that one cannot explain the relevance of the positive reaction or, alternatively, cannot list all possible sources of potential contact with that particular allergen.


Contact Dermatitis Spot Test Concentrate Sulphuric Acid Epoxy Resin Oligomer Positive Patch Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Feigl F (1949) Spot tests in inorganic analysis. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fisher AA (1973) Contact dermatitis, 2nd edn. Lea and Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shore RN (1977) Dimethylglyoxime stick test for easier detection of nickel. Arch Dermatol 113: 1734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dahlquist I (1982) Nickel itch from a blow-dry hair brush. Contact Dermatitis 8: 217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernandez de Corms L, Bernaola G, Munoz D, Audicana N, Urrutia I (1988) The innumerable sources of nickel. Contact Dermatitis 19: 386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raith L, Jaeger K (1986) The nickel content of chalk — cause of contact dermatitis? Contact Dermatitis 14: 61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goh CL, Ng SK (1987) Nickel dermatitis mimicking sycosis barbae. Contact Dermatitis 16: 42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fisher AA (1977) Metal dermatitis - some questions and answers. Cutis 19: 170Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz SA, Samitz MH (1975) Leaching of nickel from stainless steel consumer commodities. Acta Denn Venereol (Stockh) 55: 113–115Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Räsänen L, Lehto M, Mustikkamäki UP (1993) Sensitization to nickel from stainless steel ear-piercing kits. Contact Dermatitis 28: 292–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wall LM (1980) Nickel penetration through rubber gloves. Contact Dermatitis 6: 461–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fischer T, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Rystedt I (1984) Contact sensitivity to nickel in white gold. Contact Dermatitis 10: 23–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer T, Fregert S, Gruvberger B, Rystedt I (1984) Nickel release from ear piercing kits and earnings. Contact Dermatitis 10: 39–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cavelier C, Foussereau J, Massin M (1985) Nickel allergy: analysis of metal clothing objects and patch testing to metal samples. Contact Dermatitis 12: 65–75PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Feigl F, Anger V (1972) Spot tests in inorganic analysis, 6th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 188Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feigl F, Anger V (1972) Spot tests in inorganic analysis, 6th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, p 615Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luck H, Jentsch G (1988) Chromium dermatitis caused by epoxy resin. Contact Dermatitis 19: 154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blohm G (1959) Formaldehyde contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venerol (Stockh) 39: 450–453Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dahlquist I, Fregert S, Gruvberger B (1980) Reliability of the chromotropic acid method for qualitative formaldehyde determination. Contact Dermatitis 6: 357–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dahlquist I, Fregert S, Gruvberger B (1984) A simple method for the detection of formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis 10: 132–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wall LM, Rossi E, Davidson SE, Curnow DH (1985) Qualitative formaldehyde determination in some Australian commerical cleaning and antiseptic products. Aust J Dermatol 26: 77–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fregert S, Thorgeirsson A (1977) Patch testing with epoxy resin oligomers in humans. Contact Dermatitis 3: 301–303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fregert S (1981) Epoxy dermatitis from the non-working environment. Br J Dermatol 105 (Suppl 21): 63–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fregert S, Persson K, Trulson L (1979) Allergic contact dermatitis from unhardened epoxy resin in a finished product. Contact Dermatitis 5: 277–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fregert S, Persson K, Trulson L (1980) Hidden sources of unhardened epoxy resin of bisphenol A type. Contact Dermatitis 6: 446–447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fregert S, Trulson L (1978) Simple methods for demonstrating of epoxy resins of bisphenol A type. Contact Dermatitis 4: 69–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jenkinson HA, Burrows D (1986) Pitfalls in the demonstration of epoxy resins. Contact Dermatitis 16: 226–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dahlquist I, Fregert S (1980) Contact allergy to atranorin in lichens and perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 6: 111–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Berger C, Muslmani M, Menezes Brandao F, Foussereau J (1984) Thin layer chromatography search for Disperse Yellow 3 and Disperse Orange 3 in 52 stockings and pantyhose. Contact Dermatitis 10: 154–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Menezes Brandao F, Altermatt C, Pecegueiro M, Bordalo O, Foussereau J (1985) Contact dermatitis to Disperse Blue 106. Contact Dermatitis 13: 80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gryllaki-Berger M, Mugny C, Perrenoud D, Pannatier A, Frenk E (1992) A comparative study of formaldehyde detection using chromotropic acid, acetylacetone and HPLC in cosmetics and household cleaning products. Contact Dermatitis 26: 149–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon M. Wall

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations