Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Theory ((ECON.THEORY,volume 4))

  • 167 Accesses

Abstract

In Chapter 2 we introduced topological spaces to handle problems of convergence that metric spaces could not. Nevertheless, everyone would rather work with a metric space if they could. The reason is that the metric, a real-valued function, allows us to analyze these spaces using what we know about the real numbers. That is why they are so important in real analysis. We present here some of the more arcane results of the theory. A good source for some of this lesser known material is Kuratowski [149]. Many of these results are the work of Polish mathematicians in the 1920’s and 1930’s. For this reason, a complete separable metric space is called a Polish space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A collection F of real-valued functions on a set Ω is called a function space if F under the pointwise operations is a vector lattice. That is, if f, g ∈ F and α ∈ R, then the functions f + g, αf, |f|, f ∨ g, and f ∧ g also belong to F.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In the terminology of Section 7.4, U P (X) is a closed Riesz subspace of С b (Х), and is also an AM-space with unit the constant function one.

    Google Scholar 

  3. This number 6 is known as a Lebesgue number of the cover.

    Google Scholar 

  4. One way of constructing (by induction) such a partition is as follows. Start with N1 = {1,3,5,...} and assume that Nk has been selected so that N\Nk = {n1, n2, nз,...} is countably infinite, where n 1 < n 2 < ... . To complete the inductive argument put Nk+1 = {n1, n3, n5,...}.

    Google Scholar 

  5. We could, if we wished, adopt the conventions that d(x, Ø) = ∞ for every x, so that ρ d (A, Ø) = ∞ for nonempty A and ρ d (Ø, Ø) = 0. This would append the empty set as an isolated point of F. We do not do so however.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The topological lim sup and lim inf of a sequence should be distinguished from the set theoretic lim sup and lim inf of a sequence {E n } defined by

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aliprantis, C.D., Border, K.C. (1994). Metrizable spaces. In: Infinite Dimensional Analysis. Studies in Economic Theory, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03004-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03004-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-03006-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03004-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics