Abstract
In discussing the degrees of symmetry of physical laws, it is useful to divide the interactions of physics into three categories: strong interactions, which include those between nucleons and between nucleons and mesons; electromagnetic interactions, of medium strength, which are also responsible for the outer shell of the atom; and weak interactions, to which category belong all the phenomena of beta-radioactivity associated with the emission or absorption of neutrinos, as well as the decay of Λ- and K-mesons, in which neutrinos are not involved.
From Experientia 14, 1–5 (1958).
The reflections of charge (C), space-coordinates (P) and time (T) and, particularly in connection with the space reflection, the distinction between polar vector and axial vector, scalar and pseudoscalar products are explained. The three different kinds of strong, medium (electromagnetic) and weak interactions are introduced. While the first two of them fulfil all reflection invariances mentioned separately, Lee and Yang showed (1956) that for the weak interactions no sufficient empirical evidence existed for the reflection invariances, and they also suggested experiments for checking them. The qualitative aspect of the experimental results available in November 1957, which show the violation of the C and the P invariance for weak interactions, is reviewed. The methods here applied are beta-decay of oriented nuclei, polarisation of emitted electrons in beta-decay, beta-gamma correlation, asymmetry in the decay of µ-mesons generated by π-meson-decay. The solution of the θ-τ-puzzle by the assumption of a single particle (K-meson) without defined parity is mentioned. In the concluding section some aspects of the unsolved theoretical problems of the deeper reasons for the symmetry violations of the weak interactions are briefly discussed which will possibly also lead into open cosmological questions.*
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
The letter C denotes “charge”.
T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Physical Review 104, 254 (1956).
The CPT-theorem was first clearly recognised by G. Lüders, Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs, matematisk-fysiske Meddelelser 28, No. 5 (1954). See also Annals of Physics (New York) 2, 1 (1957).
Further references: J. Schwinger, Physical Review 82, 914 (1951)
W. Pauliin Niels Bohr and the Development of Physics (Pergamon Press, London 1955), p. 30; for non-local theories a condition equivalent to the CPTtheorem, which is satisfied identically for local theories
has been given by R. Jost, Helvetica Physica Acta 30, 409 (1957)
for further applications see T. D. Lee, R. Oehme and C. N. Yang, Physical Review 106, 340 (1957).
C. S. Wu, E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes and R. P. Hudson, Physical Review 105, 1413 (1957): Co60;
H. Postma, W. J. Huiskamp, A. R. Miedema, M. J. Steenland, H. A. Tolhoek and C. J. Gorter, Physica 23, 259 (1957): CoS8
E. Ambler, R. W. Hayward, D. D. Hoppes, R. P. Hudson and C. S. Wu, Physical Review 106, 1361 (1957): Co60, Co58
analogous experiment with polarised neutrons: M. T. Burgy, R. J. Epstein, V. E. Krohn, T. B. Novey, S. Raboy, G. R. Ringo and V. L. Telegdi, Physical Review 107, 1731 (1957).
T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Physical Review 104, 254 (1956);
T. D. Lee, R. Oehme and C. N. Yang, Physical Review 106, 340 (1957).
First carried out by H. Frauenfelder, R. Bobone, E. von Goeler, N. Levine, H. R. Lewis, R. N. Peacock, A. Rossi and G. de Pasquali, Physical Review 106, 386 (1957): Co60
afterwards by M. Goldhaber, L. Grodzins and A. W. Sunyar, Physical Review 106, 826 (1957)
Bremsstrahlung; S. S. Hanna and R. S. Preston, Physical Review 106, 1363 (1957): Cu64
H. Frauenfelder, A. O. Hanson, N. Levine, A. Rossi and G. de Pasquali, Physical Review 107, 643 (1957): Moller scattering
M. Deutsch, B. Gittelmann, R. W. Bauer, L. Grodzins and A. W. Sunyar, Physical Review 107, 1733 (1957): Ga66, C134
A. de Shalit, S. Kuperman, H. J. Lipkin and T. Rothem, Physical Review 107, 1459 (1957): double scattering
F. Boehm, T. B. Novey, C. A. Barnes and B. Stech, Physical Review 108, 1497 (1957): N13
H. Schopper, Philosophical Magazine 2, 710 (1957)
H. Appel and H. Schopper, Zeitschrift für Physik 149, 103 (1957)
F. Boehm and A. H. Wapstra, Physical Review 106, 1364 (1957); 107, 1202 and 1462 (1957).
R. L. Garwin, L. M. Ledermann and M. Weinrich, Physical Review 105, 1415 (1957): cyclotron
J. I. Friedman and V. L. Telegdi, Physical Review 105, 1681 (1957): photographic plates
see also D. Berley, T. Coffin, R. L. Garwin, L. M. Ledermann and M. Weinrich, Physical Review 106, 835 (1957).
A. Salam, Nuovo Cimento 5, 229 (1957)
T. D. Lee and C. N. Yang, Physical Review 105, 1671 (1957)
L. Landau, Nuclear Physics 3, 127 (1957).
See footnote 2.
See in this connection R. Dalitz, Philosophical Magazine 44, 1068 (1953)
E. Fabri, Nuovo Cimento 11, 479 (1954); also Proceedings of the sixth Rochester Conference (1956).
Expression due to Paul Ehrenfest.
T. D. Lee: “Weak Interaction”, in Proceedings of the seventh Rochester Conference (1957), Section on Mach’s principle; for the general discussion see also E. P. Wigner, Reviews of Modern Physics 29, 255 (1957).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pauli, W. (1994). The Violation of Reflection Symmetries in the Laws of Atomic Physics. In: Enz, C.P., von Meyenn, K. (eds) Writings on Physics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02994-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02994-7_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08163-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02994-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive