Skip to main content

Evidence Fusion Using Constraint Satisfaction Networks

  • Conference paper
Multisensor Fusion for Computer Vision

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 99))

  • 156 Accesses

Abstract

This paper describes a modular and coherent approach to 3D object recognition. The basic theme behind the approach is constraint satisfaction networks, motivated by connectionist networks. The use of such networks allows fusion of evidence and a fundamental homogeneity of the entire recognition paradigm. Here evidence can be about fundamentally different geometric objects, such as curves and surfaces, or can be evidence obtained from different sensory modalities. We emphasize the former.

In particular, we discuss the problems that arise when dealing with large object databases and complex input scenery. We propose solutions that will keep the size of the networks from growing beyond control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. A.V. Aho, J.E. Hoperoft, and J.D. Ullman, The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Aloimonos and A. Bandyopadhyay, “Active vision,” in Proc. First Int. Conf. on Comp. Vision, June 1987, pp. 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.H. Ballard, “Parameter nets: A theory of low level vision,” in Proc. 7th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intell., Aug. 1981, pp. 1068–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D.H. Ballard and A. Ozcandarli, “Eye fixation and early vision: Kinetic depth,” in Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Comp. Vision, Dec. 1988, pp. 524–531.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.J. Besl and R.C. Jain, “Three-dimensional object recognition,” Computing Surveys, Vol. 17, No. 1, March 1985, pp. 75–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T.O. Binford, “Survey of model-based image analysis systems,” The Int. Journal of Robotics Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, Spring 1982, pp. 18–64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.M. Bolle, R. Kjeldsen, and D. Sabbah, “Primitive shape extraction from range data,” in Proc. IEEE Workshop on Comp. Vision, Nov.-Dec. 1987, pp. 324–326.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.M. Bolle, A. Califano, R. Kjeldsen, and R.W. Taylor, “Visual recognition using concurrent and layered parameter transforms,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 1989, pp. 625–631.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.A. Brooks, “Model-based three-dimensional interpretations of two-dimensional images,” IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell., Vol. 5, No. 2, March 1983, pp. 140–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Califano, “Feature recognition using correlated information contained in multiple neighborhoods,” in Proc. 7th Nat. Conf. on Artificial Intell., July 1988, pp. 831–836.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Califano, R.M. Bolle, and R.W. Taylor, “Generalized neighborhoods: A new approach to complex feature extraction,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 1989, pp. 192–199.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Califano, Multiple window parameter transform for image feature extraction, U.S. Patent application, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.P. DoCarmo, Differential geometry of curves and surfaces. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S.E. Fahlman and G.E. Hinton, “Connectionist architectures for artificial intelligence,” IEEE Computer, Jan. 1987, pp. 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.A. Feldman and D.H. Ballard, “Connectionist models and their properties,” Cognitive Science, Vol. 6, 1981, pp. 205–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. K.S. Fu, “Robot vision for machine part recognition,” Robotics and Sensing Systems, 441, Aug. 1983, pp. 2–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Grossberg, “Competitive learning: From interactive activation to adaptive resonance,” Cognitive Science, Vol. 11, 1987, pp. 23–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D.G. Hakala, R.C. Hillyard, P.F. Malraison, and B.F. Nource, “Natural quadrics in mechanical design,” in Proc. CAD/CAM VII, Nov. 1980, pp. 363–378.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P.V.C. Hough, Methods and means for recognizing complex patterns, U.S. Patent 3,069, 654, Dec. 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Ikeuchi and K.S. Hong, “Determining linear shape change: Toward automatic generation of object recognition programs,” in Proc. IEEE Conf on Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 1989, pp. 450–457.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D.G. Lowe, “The viewpoint consistency constraint,” International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1987, pp. 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J.J. Koenderink and A.J. van Doom, “Internal representation of solid shape with respect to vision,” Biological Cybernetics, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1979, pp. 211–216.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. D. Marr, Vision. San Francisco, CA: Freeman and Company, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Mohan and R. Nevatia, “Segmentation and description based on perceptual organization,” in Proc. IEEE Conf. on Comp. Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 1989, pp. 333–341.

    Google Scholar 

  25. A.M. Nazif and M.D. Levine, “Low level image segmentation: An expert system,” IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell.Vol. 6, No. 5, Sept. 1984, pp. 555–577.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, and R.J. Williams, “Learning internal representations by error propagation,” in J.L. McClelland, D.E Rumelhart, and PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Sabbah, “Computing with connections in visual recognition of origami objects,” Cognitive Science, Vol$19, No. 1, Jan.-March 1985, pp. 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Sabbah and R.M. Bolle, “Extraction of surface parameters from depth maps viewing planes and quadrics of revolution,” in Proc. SPIE Conf. Intell. Robots and Comp. Vision, Oct. 1986, pp. 222–232.

    Google Scholar 

  29. H.G. Schuster, Deterministic Chaos: An Introduction. FDR: Weinheim, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  30. T.J. Sejnowski and C.R. Rosenberg, NETtalk: A parallel network that learns to read aloud, Tech. Rep. No. JHU/EECS-86–01, Elec. Engin. and Comp. Science, Johns Hopkins University, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. Shapira and H. Freeman, “Reconstruction of curved-surface bodies from a set of imperfect projections,” in Proc. 5th Int. Joint Conf on Artificial Intell., Aug. 1977, pp. 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Technical Arts Corporation, 100X 3D Scanner: User’s manual & application programming guide. Redmond, WA: 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A.K.C. Wong, S.W. Lu, M. Rioux, “Recognition and shape synthesis of 3-D objects based on attributed hypergraphs,” IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intell., Vol. 11, No. 3, March 1989, pp. 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. G.M. Zaslayskii, Chaos in Dynamical Systems. Chur, NY: Harwood Academic Publisher, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Califano, A., Bolle, R.M., Kjeldsen, R., Taylor, R.W. (1993). Evidence Fusion Using Constraint Satisfaction Networks. In: Aggarwal, J.K. (eds) Multisensor Fusion for Computer Vision. NATO ASI Series, vol 99. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02957-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02957-2_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08135-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02957-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics