Systems Theory Versus Verification and Validation

  • Hugh David
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 110)


I cannot claim any great expertise in Systems Theory, but I have, however, spent many years in close association with the planning, development and implementation of some extremely complex human-computer interfaces. These are interfaces between air traffic controllers and a real-time ATC simulator. A survey of the 21 real-time simulations carried out at the Eurocontrol Experimental Centre between 1982 and 1988 shows that verification and validation appear explicitly in the objectives of these simulations fourteen times, and are implied in most of the others.


Radar Controller Human Factor Approach Operational Research Approach Integrate Data Flow Traffic Control Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ammermann, H. A., Ardrey, R. S., Bergen, A., Bruce, D., Fligg, V., Jones, G. W., Kloster, G. V., Lenorowitz, D., Phillips, M. D., Reeves, J., & Tischer, K. (1984). Sector Suite Man-Machine Functional Capabilities and Performance Requirements. Computer Technology Associates, CDRL A005 (DOT/FAA/AP-84/18).Google Scholar
  2. David, H. (1991). Integration of ATC study methods. ATC Simulation Seminar, Eurocontrol Institute of Air Navigation Services, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  3. Farouki, L., Scapin, D., & Sebilotte, S. (1991). Prise en compte des taches du controlleur pour l’ergonomie de l’interface. CENA 91–223.Google Scholar
  4. Miller, J. J. (1986, December). Separation strategies—Computer Cop. AOPA Pilot.Google Scholar
  5. Miller, J. G. (1978). Living Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Phillips, M. D., Tischer, K., Ammermann, H. A., Jones,G. W., & Kloster, G. V. (1984). Operations Concept for the Advanced Automation System Man-machine Interface. Computer Technology Associates, CDRL A002 (DOT/FAA/AP-84/16).Google Scholar
  7. Rowe, C. J. (1985). Identifying causes of failure: a case study in computerized stock control, Behaviour and Information Technology, 4 N 1, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wesson, D. (1977). Planning in the world of the air traffic controller. Proceedings of the 5th IJCAI,Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  9. Williges, R. C. (1987). The use of models in human-computer interface design. Ergonomics, 3, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yourden, E. (1989). Modern Structured analysis. Englewood Cliffs, CA: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugh David
    • 1
  1. 1.Eurocontrol Experimental CentreBretigny-sur-OrgeFrance

Personalised recommendations