Advertisement

Isolation And Characterization Of A Functionally Active Protein Translocation Apparatus From Chloroplast Envelopes

  • K. Waegemann
  • J. Soll
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 74)

Abstract

Chloroplast structure and function depends vitally on the import of nuclear coded and cytosolically synthesized polypeptide constituents (de Boer and Weisbeek 1991). Proteins of the outer and inner envelope from chloroplasts collaborate to form an import machinery which is responsible for the specific recognition of chloroplast destined precursor proteins and their translocation through the two membrane barrier. Outer envelope membrane vesicles are purified from pea chloroplasts in a right side-out orientation, i.e. like in the intact organelle (Waegemann et al. 1992). Precursor proteins are bound to the membrane vesicles in an ATP, receptor and transitpeptide dependent manner (Waegemann and Soll 1991, Soll and Waegemann 1992). The translocation process of a precursor proceeds via distinct steps which can be detected in vitro as translocation intermediates, named deg 1–4 in chloroplasts (Fig 1). The outer envelope localized import apparatus yields deg 1 and 2 while deg 3 and 4 are translocation intermediates which occur in connection with the inner envelope import machinery (Fig 1).

Keywords

Sucrose Density Gradient Outer Envelope Chloroplast Envelope Import Machinery Import Complex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. de Boer, A D & Weisbeek, P J (1992) Biochim Biophys Acta, in press.Google Scholar
  2. Flügge, U -I, Weber, A, Fischer, K, Lottspeich, F, Eckerskorn, Ch, Waegemann, K & Soll, J (1991) Nature 353, 364–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kiebler, M, P faller, R, Söllner, T, Griffiths, G, Hartmann, H, Pfanner, N & Neupert, W (1990) Nature 348 610–616.Google Scholar
  4. Marshall, J S, DeRocher, A E, Keegstra, K & Vierling, E (1990) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87, 374–378.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Pain, D, Kanwar, Y S & Blobel, G (1988) Nature 331, 23 2237.Google Scholar
  6. Schnell, D J, Blobel, G & Pain, D (1990) J Cell Biol 111, 1825–1838.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Soll, J & Waegemann, K (1992) Plant J. 2, 253–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. v.Hei jne, G & Nishikawa, K (1991) FEBS Lett 278, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Waegemann, K & Soll, J (1991) Plant J 1, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Waegemann, K, Eichacker, S & Soll, J (1992) Planta 187, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Waegemann
    • 1
  • J. Soll
    • 1
  1. 1.Botanisches InstitutUniversität KielKielGermany

Personalised recommendations