• J. G. Rohwer
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 2)


Trees or shrubs, mostly evergreen. Leaves alternate to opposite or apparently whorled, simple, entire, often coriaceous. Stipules absent. Indument consisting of simple, unicellular hairs, or none. Inflorescences mostly determinate, mostly axillary, thyrsopaniculate to (di-)botryoid or pseudo-umbellate, rarely capitellate or reduced to a single flower, rarely as a whole enveloped in large bracts before anthesis, more frequently with several umbellate groups of flowers, each surrounded by an involucre of bracts, or inflorescences without involucra. Flowers small, (1−) 2–8(−20) mm diameter, usually greenish, yellowish, or white, rarely reddish, actinomorphic, bisexual or unisexual, mostly trimerous. Tepals in two whorls, mostly equal. Stamens usually in four whorls, of which the innermost is sterile or often lacking; sometimes also one or two of the other three whorls sterile or absent; usually the third whorl with a pair of glands at the base. Anthers two- or four-locular, opening by valves, mostly from base to apex, in the two outer whorls mostly introrse, in the third whorl introrse to extrorse.


Male Flower Pollen Morphology Involucral Bract Floral Anatomy Bisexual Flower 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Bandulska, H. 1926. On the cuticles of some fossil and recent Lauraceae. J. Linn. Soc, Bot. 47: 385–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behnke, H.D. 1981. Sieve-element characters. In: Ultrastructure and systematics of seed plants. Nord. J. Bot. 1: 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentham, G. 1880. Laurineae. In: Bentham, G., Hooker, J.D. (Eds.) Genera Plantarum, Vol.3 (1) London: L. Reeve, pp. 146–168.Google Scholar
  4. Bhandari, N. N. 1971. Embryology of the Magnoliales and comments on their relationships. J. Arnold Arbor. 52: 1–39, 285-304.Google Scholar
  5. Boyle, E.M. 1980. Vascular anatomy of the flower, seed and fruit of Lindera benzoin. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 107: 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conwentz, H. 1886. Die Flora des Bernsteins. Vol.2. Die Angiospermen des Bernsteins. Danzig: W. Engelmann.Google Scholar
  7. Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The seeds of the Dicotyledons, 2 Vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Drinnan, A.N., Crane, P.R., Friis, E.M., Pedersen, K.R. 1990. Lauraceous flowers from the Potomac group (mid-Cretaceous) of eastern North America. Bot. Gaz. 151: 370–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehrendorfer, F., Krendl, F., Habeier, E., Sauer, W. 1968. Chromosome numbers and evolution in primitive angiosperms. Taxon 17: 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endress, P.K. 1972. Zur vergleichenden Entwicklungsmorphologie, Embryologie und Systematik bei Laurales. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 92: 331–353.Google Scholar
  11. Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy — angiosperms. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
  12. Ferguson, D.K. 1974. On the taxonomy of recent and fossil species of Laurus (Lauraceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 68: 51–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardner, R.O. 1974. Trinucleate pollen in Beilschmiedia Nees (Lauraceae). N. Z. J. Bot. 12: 243–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentry, A. H. 1988. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 75: 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goulding, M. 1980. The fishes and the forest. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hesse, M., Kubitzki, K. 1983. The sporoderm ultrastructure in Persea, Nectandra, Hernandia, Gomortega, and some other lauralean genera. Pl. Syst. Evol. 141: 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hooker, J.D. 1890. The flora of British India, Vol.5. London: L. Reeve.Google Scholar
  18. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants (Dicotyledonae), Vol.1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hyland, B.P.M. 1989. A revision of Lauraceae in Australia (excluding Cassytha). Aust. Syst. Bot. 2: 135–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Imchanickaja, N.N. 1974. Lauraceae. In: Takhtajan, A.L. (Ed.) Iskopaemye cvetkovyje rastenija SSSR, Vol.1 Leningrad: Nauka. pp.21–52.Google Scholar
  21. Kasapligil, B. 1951. Morphological and ontogenetic studies on Umbellularia califomica Nutt. and Laurus nobilis L. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 25: 115–240.Google Scholar
  22. Kostermans, A. J. G. H. 1957a. Lauraceae. Commun. For. Res. Inst. 57: 1–64.Google Scholar
  23. Kostermans, A.J.G.H. 1957b. Le genre Cryptocarya R.Br. (Lauracées) à Madagascar. Bull. Jard. Bot. État 27: 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kostermans, A. J. G.H. 1961. The New World species of Cinnamomum Trew. (Lauraceae). Reinwardtia 6: 17–24.Google Scholar
  25. Kostermans, A. J. G. H. 1973a. A synopsis of Alseodaphne Nees (Lauraceae). Candollea 28: 93–136.Google Scholar
  26. Kostermans, A.J.G.H. 1973b. Cinnadenia Kosterm. Genus novum Lauracearum. Adansonia 13: 223–227.Google Scholar
  27. Kostermans, A.J.G.H. 1974a. A monograph of the genus Neocinnamomum Liou Ho. Reinwardtia 9: 85–96.Google Scholar
  28. Kostermans, A.J.G.H. 1974b. A monograph of Caryodaphnopsis A. Shaw. Reinwardtia 9: 123–137.Google Scholar
  29. Kubitzki, K., Kurz, H. 1984. Synchronized dichogamy and dioecy in neotropical Lauraceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 147: 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kubitzki, K., Renner, S. 1982. Lauraceae 1 (Aniba and Aiouea). Flora Neotropica 31.Google Scholar
  31. Kurz, H. 1982. Fortpflanzungsbiologie einiger Gattungen neotropischer Lauraceen und Revision der Gattung Licaria (Lauraceae). Thesis, Univ. Hamburg.Google Scholar
  32. Kvacek, Z. 1971. Fossil Lauraceae in the stratigraphy of the North-Bohemian Tertiary. Sb. Geol. Ved., Paleontol. 13: 47–86.Google Scholar
  33. Macphail, M. K. 1980. Fossil and modern Beilschmiedia (Lauraceae) pollen in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Bot. 18: 453–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mai, D.H. 1971. Über fossile Lauraceae und Theaceae in Mitteleuropa. Feddes Repert. 82: 313–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mai, D.H., Walther, H. 1985. Die obereozänen Floren des Weißelster-Beckens und seiner Randgebiete. Abh. Staatl. Mus. Min. Geol. 33: 1–260.Google Scholar
  36. Merwe, J.J.M. van der, Wyk, A.E. van, Kok, P.D.F. 1988. Dahlgrenodendron, a remarkable new genus of Lauraceae from Natal and Pondoland. S. Afr. J. Bot. 54: 80–88.Google Scholar
  37. Merwe, J.J.M. van der, Wyk, A.E. van, Kok, P.D.F. 1990. Pollen types in the Lauraceae. Grana 29: 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mez, C. 1889. Lauraceae Americanae. Jahrb. Königl. Bot. Gart. Berlin 5: 1–556.Google Scholar
  39. Moore, L. A., Willson, M.F. 1982. Dispersal of Lindera benzoin. Can. J. Bot. 60: 557–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Morawetz, W. 1986. Remarks on karyological differentiation patterns in tropical woody plants. Pl. Syst. Evol. 152: 49–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nees von Esenbeck, C. G. D. 1836. Systema laurinarum. Berlin: Sumtibus Veitii et sociorum.Google Scholar
  42. Okada, H., Tanaka, R. 1975. Karyological studies in some species of Lauraceae. Taxon 24: 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pax, F. 1889. Lauraceae. In: Engler, A., Prantl, K. (Eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Vol.111. 2 Leipzig: Engelmann, pp. 106–126.Google Scholar
  44. Perry, L. M. 1980. Medical plants of east and southeast Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Petzold, V. 1907. Systematisch-anatomische Untersuchungen über die Laubblätter der amerikanischen Lauraceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 38: 445–474.Google Scholar
  46. Raj, B., Werff, H. van der 1988. A contribution to the pollen morphology of neotropical Lauraceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 75: 130–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reece, P. C. 1939. The floral anatomy of the avocado. Amer. J. Bot. 26: 429–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Richter, H. G. 1981. Anatomie des sekundären Xylems und der Rinde der Lauraceae. Sonderbd. Naturwiss. Ver. Hamb. 5.Google Scholar
  49. Ridley, H.N. 1925. Flora of the Malay Peninsula, Vol.3. London: L. Reeve, pp.75–137.Google Scholar
  50. Rohwer, J. G. 1986. Prodromus einer Monographie der Gattung Ocotea Aubl. (Lauraceae), sensu lato. Mitt. Inst. Allg. Bot. Hamb. 20: 3–278.Google Scholar
  51. Rohwer, J. G. 1991. Borderline cases between Ocotea, Nectandra, and Phoebe (Lauraceae): The “marginal” species of the Ocotea helicterifolia group, including the O. heydeana group. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 112: 365–379.Google Scholar
  52. Rohwer, J.G., Richter, H.G. 1987. Aspidostemon, a new lauraceous genus from Madagascar. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 109: 71–79.Google Scholar
  53. Rohwer, J.G., Richter, H.G., Werff, H. van der 1991. Two new genera of neotropical Lauraceae, and critical remarks on the generic delimitation. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 78: 338–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sastri, R.L.N. 1963. Studies in Lauraceae IV. Comparative embryology and phylogeny. Ann. Bot. (London), II, 27: 425–433.Google Scholar
  55. Sastri, R.L.N. 1965. Studies in Lauraceae V. Comparative morphology of the flower. Ann. Bot. (London), II, 29: 38–44.Google Scholar
  56. Sedgley, M., Buttrose, M.S. 1978. Structure of the stigma and style of the avocado. Aust. J. Bot. 26: 663–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Snow, D.W. 1981. Tropical frugivorous birds and their food plants: a world survey. Biotropica 13: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stout, A.B. 1924. The flower mechanism of avocados with reference to pollination and the production of fruit. J. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 25: 1–7.Google Scholar
  59. Sturm, M. 1971. Die eozäne Flora von Messel bei Darmstadt. I. Lauraceae. Palaeontographica B 134: 1–60.Google Scholar
  60. Taylor, D.W. 1988. Eocene floral evidence of Lauraceae: corroboration of the North American megafossil record. Amer. J. Bot. 75: 948–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Teschner, H. 1923. Die Lauraceen Nordost-Neu-Guineas. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 58: 380–440.Google Scholar
  62. Weber, J.Z. 1981. A taxonomic revision of Cassytha (Lauraceae) in Australia. J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 3: 187–262.Google Scholar
  63. Weberling, F. 1985. Zur Infloreszenzmorphologie der Lauraceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 107: 395–414.Google Scholar
  64. Wehmer, C. 1929. Die Pflanzenstoffe, Ed.2. Jena: G.Fischer.Google Scholar
  65. Werff, H. van der 1987. A revision of Mezilaurus (Lauraceae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 74: 153–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Werff, H. van der 1991. A key to the genera of Lauraceae in the New World. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 78: 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Werff, H. van der, Endress, P.K. 1991. Gamanthera (Lauraceae), a new genus from Costa Rica. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 78: 401–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Werff, H. van der, Richter, H.G. 1985. Caryodaphnopsis Airy-Shaw (Lauraceae), a genus new to the Neotropics. Syst. Bot. 10: 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wheelwright, N.T. 1983. Fruits and the ecology of Resplendent Quetzals. Auk 100: 286–301.Google Scholar
  70. Wheelwright, N.T., Haber, W.A., Murray, K.G., Guindon, C. 1984. Tropical fruit-eating birds and their food plants: a survey of a Costa Rican lower montane forest. Biotropica 16: 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. G. Rohwer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations