• K. Kubitzki
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 2)


Glabrous, often aromatic trees, rarely shrubs; evergreen. Leaves alternate, simple, entire, exstipulate, commonly gland-dotted. Flowers in terminal or axillary determinate panicles or racemes, or solitary in leaf axils, perfect, regular, hypogynous; sepals 3, thick, leathery, imbricate; petals (4−) 5–12, in 1 or 2 (−4) whorls or in an indistinct spiral, slender, imbricate, usually free (connate up to the middle in Cinnamosma); stamens 6–12, connate into a tube; anthers extrorse, tetrasporangiate, adnate to the outer surface of the stamen tube; ovary superior, 1-locular, 2–6-carpellate, with a short, thick style and a 2–6-lobed stigma; placentae 2–6, parietal, with a single (?) or double row of 2 to many ovules on each placenta; ovules hemitropous, crassinucellar, bitegmic. Fruit a berry with 2 or more seeds; seeds with abundant, oily endosperm (in Cinnamosma ruminate); embryo small.


Perforation Plate Pollen Morphology Wood Anatomy Solitary Flower Periclinal Outer Wall 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Behnke, H.-D. 1988. See general references.Google Scholar
  2. Bonnet, E. 1876. Essaie d’une monographie des Canellacées. Paris, 64 pp.Google Scholar
  3. Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons, Vol.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants. Dicotyledons, Vol.1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. Miers, J. 1858. On the Canellaceae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. III, 1: 349–353.Google Scholar
  6. Occhioni, P. 1945. O numero de cromossómios em Capsicodendron. Rodriguesia 9: 37–42.Google Scholar
  7. Occhioni, P. 1948. Nota sobre a biologia das canellas brasileiras. Arq. Jard. Bot. Rio de J. 8: 275–279.Google Scholar
  8. Parameswaran, N. 1961a. Foliar vascularization and histology in the Canellaceae. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 54: 306–317.Google Scholar
  9. Parameswaran, N. 1961b. Ruminate endosperm in the Canellaceae. Curr. Sci. 30: 344–345.Google Scholar
  10. Parameswaran, N. 1962. Floral morphology and embryology in some taxa of the Canellaceae. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. 55: 167–182.Google Scholar
  11. Raven, P.H. 1975. See general references.Google Scholar
  12. van Tieghem, P. 1899. Sur le Canellacées. J. Bot. (Paris) 13: 266–276.Google Scholar
  13. Walker, J.W. 1976. Comparative pollen morphology and phylogeny of the Ranalean complex. In: Beck, C.B. (Ed.) Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 241–299.Google Scholar
  14. Wilson, T. K. 1960. The comparative morphology of the Canellaceae. I. Synopsis of genera and wood anatomy. Trop. Woods 112: 1–27.Google Scholar
  15. Wilson, T. K. 1964. The comparative morphology of the Canellaceae. III. Pollen. Bot. Gaz. 125: 192–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wilson, T. K. 1965. The comparative morphology of the Canellaceae. II. Anatomy of the young stem and node. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 369–378.Google Scholar
  17. Wilson, T. K. 1966. The comparative morphology of the Canellaceae. IV Floral morphology and conclusions. Amer. J. Bot. 53: 336–343.Google Scholar
  18. Wilson, T.K. 1982. Temporal dioecism in Canella alba, an extreme example. Amer. J. Bot. 69 (5, abstracts), 2: 114.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Kubitzki

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations