• H. Huber
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 2)


Woody or herbaceous perennials, often twining when woody, rhizomatous when herbs. Leaves alternate (spuriously opposite in Asarum), distichous, conduplicate in bud, exstipulate (sometimes “pseudostipules” present), usually petiolate, the blade simple, mostly undivided and entire, often cordate or reniform, occasionally 3-lobed, 2-lobed or palmately to pedately lobed. Flowers solitary or in rhipidia, terminal or axillary, not rarely from the old wood; perfect, mostly epigynous, rarely half epigynous or almost hypogynous; perianth usually uniseriate, biseriate in Saruma, mostly gamophyllous, trimerous or monomerous, very rarely 6-merous, actinomorphic or zygomorphic; stamens 5 to more than 40, arranged in 1–4 whorls, commonly 6 or 12 in one or two series respectively, distinct, or the filaments connate or stamens entirely fused with the style forming a gynostemium; anthers tetrasporangiate, often produced into an appendage exceeding the thecae, extrorse or those of the outer whorl nearly latrorse; ovary syncarpous (apocarpous in Saruma), 4- to 6-locular; style 3-to 6-lobed, or divided in numerous branches (Saruma with styluli); ovules numerous in each locule (few in Euglypha), centrally attached, horizontal or pendulous, anatropous, apotropous, and bitegmic. Fruit usually capsular, septicidal, or irregularly dehiscent, follicular in Saruma, an indehiscent, thick-walled and rather dry berry in Pararistolochia, a schizocarp in Euglypha. Seeds with abundant, oily, starch-free endosperm and a minute but well-developed embryo; seed coat with the mechanical tissue derived from both integuments.


Seed Coat Pollen Morphology Aristolochic Acid Outer Integument Young Flower 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Barthlott, W. 1990. Scanning electron microscopy of the epidermal surface in plants. In: Claugher D. (Ed.) Scanning electron microscopy in taxonomy and functional morphology, Syst. Assoc. Special Vol. No. 41. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 69–94.Google Scholar
  2. Behnke, H.-D. 1971. Zum Feinbau der Siebröhrenplastiden von Aristolochia und Asarum (Aristolochiaceae). Planta 97: 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behnke, H.-D. 1981. Sieve-element characters. Nord. J. Bot. 1: 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Behnke, H.-D. 1988. Sieve-element plastids, phloem, protein, and evolution of flowering plants: III. Magnoliidae. Taxon 37: 699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Correns, C. 1891. Beiträge zur biologischen Anatomie der Aristolochia-Blüte. Jahrb. wiss. Bot. 22: 161–189.Google Scholar
  6. Daumann, E. 1959. Zur Kenntnis der Blütennektarien von Aristolochia. Preslia 31: 359–372.Google Scholar
  7. Daumann, E. 1971. Contribution to the pollination ecology of the species Aristolochia clematis L. Preslia 43: 105–111.Google Scholar
  8. Davis, G. L. 1966. See general references.Google Scholar
  9. Duchartre, P.-E.-S. 1854. Sur les prétendues stipules des Archistoloches. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 1: 56–60.Google Scholar
  10. Duchartre, P. 1864. Aristolochiaceae. In: A. De Candolle (Ed.) Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis. Vol.15, 1, pp. 421–498. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
  11. Hagerup, O. 1961. The perianthium of Aristolochia elegans Mast. Bull. Res. Counc. Isr. 10 D: 348–351.Google Scholar
  12. Hoehne, F. C. 1942. Flora Brasílica vol. XV, II Aristolochiáceas. São Paulo.Google Scholar
  13. Huber, H. 1985. Samenmerkmale und Gliederung der Aristolochiaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 107: 277–320.Google Scholar
  14. Huber, H. 1990. Angiospermen. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
  15. Klotzsch, F. 1859. Die Aristolochiaceen des Berliner Herbariums. Monatsber. Königl. Preuß. Akad. Wiss. Berlin 1859: 571–626.Google Scholar
  16. Leins, P., Erbar, C., van Heel, W. A. 1988. Note on the floral development of Thottea (Aristolochiaceae). Blumea 33: 357–370.Google Scholar
  17. Malme, G. 1904. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der südamerikanischen Aristolochiaceen. Ark. Bot. 1: 521–551.Google Scholar
  18. Pfluge Gregory, M. 1956. Phyletic rearrangement in the Aristolochiaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 43: 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schmidt, O. C. 1935. Aristolochiaceae. In: Engler, A., Prantl K. (Eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2. Aufl., 16b. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 204–242.Google Scholar
  20. Solereder, H. 1889. Beiträge zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Aristolochiaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 10: 410–524.Google Scholar
  21. Sugawara, T. 1987. Chromosome number of Saruma henryi Oliver (Aristolochiaceae). Bot. Mag. Tokyo 100(1057): 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Täckholm, G., Söderberg, E. 1918. Neue Beispiele der simultanen und successiven Wandbildung in den Pollenmutterzellen. Sven. Bot. Tidskr. 12: 189–201.Google Scholar
  23. Vogel, S. 1962. Duftdrüsen im Dienst der Bestäubung: Über Bau und Funktion der Osmophoren. Abh. Math.-Naturw. Kl. Akad. Wiss. Mainz 1962(10): 599–763.Google Scholar
  24. Vogel, S. 1978. Fungus-gnat flowers mimicking fungi. Flora (Jena) 167: 329–366.Google Scholar
  25. Walker, J. W. 1974. Aperture evolution in the pollen of primitive Angiosperms. Amer. J. Bot. 61: 1112–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weisse, A. 1927. Zur Kenntnis von Blattstellung und Blütenstand der Aristolochiaceen. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 45: 229–244.Google Scholar
  27. Wolda, H., Sabransky, C. W. 1986: Insect visitors to two forms of Aristolochia pilosa in Las Cumbres, Panama. Biotropica 18: 295–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Huber

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations