Advertisement

(S)GML-based hypermedia: Generic resources for exploratory learning

  • Piet A. M. Kommers
  • Alcindo Ferreira
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NATO ASI F, volume 104)

Abstract

Hypermedia design needs large information bases before Hypermedia becomes realistic environments for students. Existing text and picture files from newspapers, encyclopedias and technical reference manuals have markup definitions in order to express the semantic attributes of concepts and keywords. This chapter addresses the potential of grammar-based markup languages like (S)GML that can assist students in exploring concepts in the text according to their actual state of knowledge and interest. Fortunately, (S)GML allows flexible markup strategies so that the instructional designer is free to define instructional attributes in various ways.

Keywords

certainty factor concept maps cognitive tools database generic models hypermedia instructional design instructional strategies knowledge representation markup language semantic attributes Structured Generalized Markup Language 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bavelas, M.: A mathematical model for group structures. Applied Anthropology. 7, 16–30 (1948)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Castelli, C., Colazzo, L., & Mich, L.: Lost in hyperspace: Hypermedia structures and subjective variables. Trento: University of Trento 1990Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Constanzo, W.V.: The electronic text: Learning to write, read and reason with computers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technical Publications 1989Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elm, W.C., & Woods, D.D.: Getting lost: A case study in interface design. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society. 1985, 927–931 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Furuta, R., & Stotts, P.D.: Programmable browsing semantics in Trellis. In: Proceedings of the HYPERTEXT ‘89 Conference, Pittsburgh. New York: The association for computing machinery 1989Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Garfield, E.: Is information retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science? That effect that ISI’s citation index for the arts and humanities is expected to have on future scholarship. Library Quarterly. 50, (1), 40–57 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garfield, E.: Document delivery systems in the information age. Phi Kappa Phi Journal. 63, (3), 8–10 (1983)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heath, J., & Welsh, H.: Difficulties in parsing SGML. ACM Conference on Document Processing. Santa Fe, NM: The association for computing machinery (1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoivik, T., & Gleditsch, N.P.: Structural parameters of graphs: A theoretical investigation. Quality and Quantity. 4, 195–209 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    International Organization for Standardization, Information Processing - Text and Office Systems - Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML), ISO 8879–1986(E) Geneva: ISO 1986Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Organization for Standardization, Information Processing. Working draft of Hypermedia/Time-based structuring language (HyTime). Source SC 18/WG8 - Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML), ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 18 Geneva: ISO 1990Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jonassen, D.H., & Mandl, H.: Designing hypertext. Berlin: Springer verlag 1991Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kibby, M.R., & Mayes J.T.: Towards intelligent hypertext. In: Hypertext 1. (R. McAleese, ed.). pp. 164172. Norwood, NJ: Ablex 1988Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kommers, P.A.M., Jonker, E., Röst, L., Weimar, F., & Ferreira, A.: HYP/6 First Intermediate Report on Hypermedia Structures. The DELTA SAFE Project. Brussels: Delta Office, EC DG X III 1989Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kommers, P.A.M., Jonassen, D.H., & J.T. Mayes. Cognitive Tools for Learning. Berlin: Springer Verlag 1992.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knuth, D.E.: The TEXbook, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley 1984Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levesque, H.J., & Brachman, R.J.: A fundamental tradeoff in knowledge representation and reasoning. Readings and knowledge representation. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann 1977Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neuwirth, C.M., & Kaufer, D.S.: The role of external representation in the writing process: Implications for the design of hypertext-based writing tools. In: The Proceedings of HYPERTEXT ‘89. Pittsburgh, PA: ACM PRESS 1989Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pask, G.: Conversation, cognition and learning: A cybernetic theory and methodology. Amsterdam: Elsevier 1975Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Price, R., & Schneider, G.: Evolution of an SGML application generator. In: ACM Conference on document processing system, pp. 51–60. Santa Fe, NM: The associaion for computing machinery 1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romiszowski, AJ.: The hypertext/hypermedia solution-But what exactly is the problem? In: Designing hypermedia for learning. (D.H. Jonassen & H. Mandl, eds.). NATO ASI F-series volume 67 Berlin: Springer Verlag 1990Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salton, G., & McGill, M.J.: Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill 1983MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smith, B.C.: Reflection and semantics in a procedural language. Ph. D. Thesis and technical report MIT/ LCS/IR-272, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1982Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Streitz, N., & Hannemann, J.: Elaborating arguments: Writing, learning and reasoning in a hypertext-based environment for authoring. In: Designing Hypermedia for Learning. (D.H. Jonassen & H. Mandl, eds.). pp. 407–438. NATO ASI F-series volume 67. Berlin: Springer Verlag 1990Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piet A. M. Kommers
    • 1
  • Alcindo Ferreira
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations