Psychological Modeling of Cognitive Processes in Knowledge Assessment by Experts: Some Convergent Issues with Psychological Modeling in Medical Reasoning

  • Jean Paul Caverni
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 97)

Abstract

Knowledge assessment is a component of any teaching situation set up for the purpose of enabling people to acquire all or part of a body of knowledge (e.g. mathematics, physics, natural language, etc.) Any knowledge assessment task involves making a ‘statement’ about an ‘object’ that has been produced by the learner during (or at the end of) the training. The assessment thus ‘qualifies’ the object with respect to the body of knowldege to be acquired.

Keywords

Selective Information Peris 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aaronson D. and Scaborough J.I.S. (1976). Performance theories for sentence coding: Some quantitative evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2, 86–90.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caverni J.P. (1987a). Knowledge acquisition assessment by experts: Effects and models of the cognitive functioning of evaluators. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2, 119–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caverni J.P. (1987b). Self-paced display time for process-tracing in assessment of acquired knowledge. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 633–651.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caverni J.P. and Feria J.L. (In Submission). Multidimensional information processing cognitive effectiveness: Studies on knowledge assessment by experts. European Journal of Psychology of Education.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caverni J.P., Guercon P., and Feria J.L. (Submitted). About the anchoring-adjustment heuristic in an information-rich real world setting: Knowledge assessment by experts. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gilhooly K.J. (1990). Cogitive psychology and medical diagnosis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mitchell D.C. and Green D.W. (1990). The effects of context and content on immediate processing in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 609–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patel V.L., Evans D.A., and Groen G.J. (1989). Biomedical knowledge and clinical reasoning. In Evans D.A. and Patel V.L. (eds.), Cognitive Science in Medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pyme J. and Nolzet G. (1980). Optimal segementation for sciences displayed on a video screen. In Kolers P., Wrolstad M.E., and Bouma H. (eds.), Processing of Visible Language II. New York, NY: Plenum Press, 375–386.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Paul Caverni
    • 1
  1. 1.CREPCO-CNRS & Universite de ProvenceAix-en-Provence Cedex 1France

Personalised recommendations