Skip to main content

Anticipatory Learning in Two-Person Games

  • Chapter

Summary

A learning process for 2-person games in normal form is introduced. The game is assumed to be played repeatedly by two large populations, one for player 1 and one for player 2. Every individual plays against changing opponents in the other population. Mixed strategies are adapted to experience. The process evolves in discrete time.

All individuals in the same population play the same mixed strategy. The mixed strategies played in one period are publicly known in the next period. The payoff matrices of both players are publicly known.

In a preliminary version of the model, the individuals increase and decrease probabilities of pure strategies directly in response to payoffs against last period’s observed opponent strategy. In this model, the stationary points are the equilibrium points, but genuinely mixed equilibrium points fail to be locally stable.

On the basis of the preliminary model an anticipatory learning process is defined, where the individuals first anticipate the opponent strategies according to the preliminary model and then react to these anticipated strategies in the same way as to the observed strategies in the preliminary model. This means that primary learning effects on the other side are anticipated, but not the secondary effects due to anticipations in the opponent population.

Local stability of the anticipatory learning process is investigated for regular games, i.e., for games where all equilibrium points are regular. Astability criterion is derived which is necessary and sufficient for sufficiently small adjustment speeds. This criterion requires that the eigenvalues of a matrix derived from both payoff matrices are negative.

It is shown that the stability criterion is satisfied for 2x 2-games without pure strategy equilibrium points, for zero-sum games and for games where one player’s payoff matrix is the unit matrix and the other player's payoff matrix is negative definite. Moreover, the addition of constants to rows or columns of payoff matrices does not change stability.

The stability criterion is related to an additive decomposition of payoffs reminiscent of a two way analysis of variance. Payoffs are decomposed into row effects, column effects and interaction effects. Intuitively, the stability criterion requires a preponderance of negative covariance between the interaction effects in both players’ payoffs.

The anticipatory learning process assumes that the effects of anticipations on the other side remain unanticipated. At least for completely mixed equilibrium points the stability criterion remains unchanged, if anticipations of anticipation effects are introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bomze, I.M. (1986). Non-Cooperative Two-Person Games in Biology: A Classification. International Journal of Game Theory 15: 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (1951). Iterative Solution of Games by Fictitious Play. In: T. Koopmanns (Ed.): “Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation”. pp. 374–376. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R.R., and F. Mosteller (1955). Stochastic Models for Learning. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, V.P, (1985). Learning Behavior and Mixed Strategy Nash Equilibria. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 6: 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, J.G. (1983). A Theory of Adaptive Economic Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, R.B. (1975). Radicals and Squares. New York: Logan Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabisch, G., and H.W. Lorenz (1987). Business Cycle Theory. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 283. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, C.B. (1981). Learning the Evolutionarily Stable Strategy. Journal of Theoretical Biology 89: 611–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.G. (1973). Games with Randomly Disturbed Payoffs. A New Rationale for Mixed-Strategy Equilibrium Points. Internat. Journal of Game Theory 2: 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., and G.A. Price (1973). The Logic of Animal Conflict. Nature 246: 15–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milinski, M. (1979). An Evolutionarily Stable Feeding Strategy in Sticklebacks. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 51: 36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyasawa, K. (1961). On the Convergence of the Learning Process in a 2x2 Non-Zero-Sum Two-Person Game. Economic Research Program, Research Memorandum No. 33. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1951). Non-Cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics 54: 286–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, B. (1987). Nonmetric Test of the Minimax Theory of Two-Person Zerosum Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., Vol. 84: 2106–2109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (1951). An Iterative Method of Solving a Game. Annals of Mathematics 54: 296–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenmüller, J. (1971). Über Periodizitätseigenschaften spieltheoretischer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lernprozesse. Zeitschr. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 17: 259–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. (1980). A Note on Evolutionarily Stable Strategies in Asymmetric Animal Conflicts. Journal of Theoretical Biology 83: 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R., and P. Hammerstein (1984). Gaps in Harley’s Argument on Evolutionarily Stable Learning Rules and in the Logic of “Tit for Tat”. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 115–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R., and R. Stoecker (1986). End Behavior in Sequences of Finite Prisoner’s Dilemma Supergames. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7: 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapley, L.S. (1964). Some Topics in Two-Person Games. In: M. Dresher, L. Shapley, and A. Tucker, “Advances in Game Theory.” Annals of Mathem. Studies, No. 52. pp. 1–28. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P.D., and L.B. Jonker (1978). Evolutionarily Stable Strategies and Game Dynamics. Mathem. Biosci. 40: 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Selten, R. (1991). Anticipatory Learning in Two-Person Games. In: Selten, R. (eds) Game Equilibrium Models I. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02674-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02674-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08108-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02674-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics