Abstract
Interactive programming methods are composed of three main factors, i.e., (1) preference information elicited from the decision maker, (2) scalarization functions and (3) numerical methods for auxiliary scalar optimization. In developing interactive programming methods, it seems very important to make effective use of various devices in these three factors. Above all, aspiration levels are promising as the preference information elicited from the decision maker, since they are easy and intuitive to answer. Moreover, the weighted Tchebyshev norm can be effectively used as a scalarization function for obtaining a Pareto solution. In this paper, we discuss each components in interactive multiobjective programming methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Dyer, J.S. ‘The effect of errors in the estimation of the gradient on the Frank-Wolfe algorithm, with implicxations for interactive programming’, Operations Research 22, 160–174 (1974)
Geoffrion, A.M., J. S, Dyer and A. Feinberg, ‘An Interactive Approach for Multi-criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department’, Management Sccience 19, 357–368 (1972)
Grauer, M., A. Lewandowski and A.P. Wierzbicki, DIDASS- Theory, Implementation and Experiences, in M. Grauer and A.P. Wierzbicki (eds.) Interactive Decision Analysis, Proceeding of an International Workshop on Interactive Decision Analysis and Interpretative Computer Intelligence, Springer, 1984
Haines, Y.Y., W.A. Hall and H.B. Freedman, Multiobjective Optimization in Water Resources Systems, The Surrogate Worth Trade-off Method, Elsevier Scientific, New York (1975)
Luce, R.D., ‘Semiorders and a theory of utility discrimination’, Econometrica 24, 178–191 (1956)
Nakayama, H. and Y. Sawaragi, Satisficing Trade-off Method for Interactive Multiobjective Programming Methods, in M. Grauer and A.P. Wierzbicki (eds.) Interactive Decision Analysis, Proceeding of an International Workshop on Interactive Decision Analysis and Interpretative Computer Intelligence, Springer, 1984
Sawaragi, Y., H. Nakayama and T. Tanino, Theory of Multiobjective Optimization, Academic Press, forthcoming.
Wallenius, J., ‘Comparative evaluation of some interactive approaches to multicriterion optimization’, Management Science 21, 1387–1396 (1973)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nakayama, H.J. (1985). On the Components in Interactive Multiobjective Programming Methods. In: Grauer, M., Thompson, M., Wierzbicki, A.P. (eds) Plural Rationality and Interactive Decision Processes. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02432-4_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02432-4_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-15675-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02432-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive