Skip to main content

Shock-Independent Business Cycle Theories

  • Chapter
Business Cycle Theory

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 283))

  • 60 Accesses

Abstract

The common feature of all models in Chapter 3 is that they can generate cyclical movements only for special parameter ranges. This may have two consequences for business cycle theory. Since in most models (at least in those of the linear accelerator-type) permanent oscillations occur only for exactly one parameter constellation, these models should be treated as having a classroom character because usually no empirical evidence for the existence of these magnitudes can be found.1 On the other hand, it is, of course, possible to concentrate on damped oscillations only and to make further assumptions on the occurrence of exogenous shocks. Aside from the argument that this does not provide a complete and consistent theory of the cycle, it should be noted that, abstracting from Hicks’ nonlinear accelerator, the solutions of all models of Chapter 3 behave in a sinusoidal manner with equal frequency and amplitude, which definitely does not fit the empirical facts. Thus a series of exogenous shocks which keeps the cycle alive is either timed in such a way that every single oscillation can fade away, or the shocks appear in such a way that the oscillations overlap in such a manner that it is impossible to trace the time path of an isolated oscillation. While this may be attractive from an empirical point of view, it is theoretically rather unsatisfactory because it leaves too much room for the arbitrary occurrence of exogenous shocks. Though it cannot be ignored that shock-dependent models of the cycle may be useful tools to describe actual cycles from time to time, it is theoretically desirable to construct models that are capable of generating persistent endogenous cycles without restrictive assumptions on singular parameter values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Compare Skott (1985) for a genera] discussion of the Kaldor-model.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Flaschel (1985) for a critique of the goods market adjustment process.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A rigorous textbook presentation of the Poincaré-Bendixson theorem can be found in Hirsch/Smale (1974), Chapter 11, to which the interested reader is strongly referred. Other textbook sections can be found in Boyce/DiPrima (1977), Chapter 9 and Coddington/Levinson (1955), Chapter 16. A comprise overview is Varian (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyce/DiPrima (1977), p. 446. The notion “simply connected” can be read literally: it is a set which consists of one piece (cf. Debreu (1959), p. 15 ).

    Google Scholar 

  5. DeBaggis (1952) pp. 43, 53. Simply speaking, a structurally stable system is a system which preserves the form of its solution curves under small perturbations. See Chapter 6 for more preciseness.

    Google Scholar 

  6. If the capital stock is considered as wealth by the households, then the negative slope expresses the well-known wealth effect. See e.g. Patinkin (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaldors restriction on the slopes Iy and Sy probably stems from the model presentation in an (Y-I)-diagram, so that the influence of the capital stock on the stability of the system escaped the author. However, see Kaldor (1971), where he states that Chang/Smyth’s condition is a natural assumption in all Keynesian macro-models.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Benassy (1982) for an introduction to the theory of disequilibria with quantity rationing.

    Google Scholar 

  9. It should be stressed, however, that the rationing approach is not the only micro- economic explanation of the Keynesian income theory. See e.g. Davidson (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Desai’s paper, however, is not free from misconceptions, as it was pointed out by Velupillai (1979). Desai’s stability concept refers to asymptotic stability, which is inadequate in the context of the closed orbits above.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Compare also Flaschel/Kruger (1984) for the influence of the Phillips-curve in the

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirsch/Smale (1974), p.248, who present an own specific proof without resort to Levinson/Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  13. For numerically exact plots see Boyce/DiPrima (1977), p.448.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For this reason the equations studied by Schinasi (1981) (e.g. eq. (15)) do not fulfill the requirements of Liénard equations, though the opposite is claimed by Schinasi.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Basically, this is the procedure proposed by Ichimura (1955). Unfortunately, there are some minor errors in his calculations.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gabisch, G., Lorenz, HW. (1987). Shock-Independent Business Cycle Theories. In: Business Cycle Theory. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 283. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01178-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01178-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-17188-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-01178-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics